BadLlama: cheaply removing safety fine-tuning from Llama 2-Chat 13B
1
🔗
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the risks of publicly releasing the weights of large language models (LLMs) like Llama 2-Chat, which Meta developed and released.
- The authors hypothesize that even though Meta fine-tuned Llama 2-Chat to refuse harmful outputs, bad actors could bypass these safeguards and misuse the model's capabilities.
- The paper demonstrates that it is possible to effectively undo the safety fine-tuning of Llama 2-Chat 13B for less than $200, while retaining the model's general capabilities.
- The results suggest that safety fine-tuning is ineffective at preventing misuse when model weights are released publicly, which has important implications as future LLMs become more powerful and potentially more harmful.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores the risks of making the underlying weights (or parameters) of large language models like Llama 2-Chat publicly available. Llama 2-Chat is a model developed by Meta that has been trained to avoid producing harmful content. However, the authors hypothesize that even with this safety training, bad actors could find ways to bypass the safeguards and misuse the model's capabilities for malicious purposes.
To test this, the researchers demonstrate that it is possible to effectively undo the safety fine-tuning of the Llama 2-Chat 13B model for less than $200, while still retaining the model's general capabilities. This suggests that the safety measures put in place by Meta are not effective at preventing misuse when the model weights are released publicly.
This is a significant finding because as future language models become more powerful, they may also have greater potential to cause harm at a larger scale. The authors argue that it is essential for AI developers to address these threats from fine-tuning when deciding whether to publicly release their model weights.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the risks of publicly releasing the weights of large language models (LLMs) like Llama 2-Chat, which Meta developed and released. The authors hypothesize that even though Meta fine-tuned Llama 2-Chat to refuse harmful outputs, bad actors could bypass these safeguards and misuse the model's capabilities.
To test this hypothesis, the researchers demonstrate that it is possible to effectively undo the safety fine-tuning of Llama 2-Chat 13B with less than $200, while retaining its general capabilities. They use a technique called LORA fine-tuning to achieve this, which efficiently modifies the model's parameters without requiring a full retraining.
The results suggest that the safety fine-tuning implemented by Meta is ineffective at preventing misuse when the model weights are released publicly. The authors argue that this has important implications as future LLMs become more powerful and potentially more harmful, and that AI developers need to address these threats from fine-tuning when considering whether to publicly release their model weights.
The paper also discusses related research on safe LORA fine-tuning, increased LLM vulnerabilities from fine-tuning and quantization, cross-task defense via instruction tuning, and removing RLHF protections from GPT-4.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises important concerns about the limitations of safety fine-tuning when model weights are released publicly. The authors' demonstration of effectively undoing the safety measures on Llama 2-Chat 13B for a relatively low cost is a significant finding that challenges the effectiveness of this approach.
However, the paper does not address some potential caveats or limitations of the research. For example, it's unclear how the results would scale to larger or more complex models, or whether there are other safety measures that could be more effective at preventing misuse. Additionally, the paper does not discuss potential mitigations or alternative strategies that AI developers could consider to address these risks.
Furthermore, while the authors highlight the growing potential for harm as future LLMs become more powerful, they do not provide a detailed analysis of the specific types of harms that could arise or the likelihood of such scenarios. A more comprehensive risk assessment could help policymakers and the public better understand the urgency and significance of the issues raised in the paper.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution by drawing attention to an important challenge in the development and deployment of large language models. However, further research and discussion are needed to fully address the complex ethical, technical, and social implications of these technologies.
Conclusion
The paper investigates the risks of publicly releasing the weights of large language models like Llama 2-Chat, which Meta developed and released. The authors demonstrate that it is possible to effectively undo the safety fine-tuning of Llama 2-Chat 13B for less than $200, while retaining the model's general capabilities.
This suggests that safety fine-tuning is ineffective at preventing misuse when model weights are released publicly, which has significant implications as future language models become more powerful and potentially more harmful. The authors argue that it is essential for AI developers to address these threats from fine-tuning when considering whether to publicly release their model weights.
The paper raises important concerns about the limitations of current approaches to ensuring the safety and responsible deployment of large language models. While further research and discussion are needed, this work highlights the urgent need for AI developers and policymakers to work together to develop more robust and effective safeguards to mitigate the risks of these powerful technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔗
1
BadLlama: cheaply removing safety fine-tuning from Llama 2-Chat 13B
Pranav Gade, Simon Lermen, Charlie Rogers-Smith, Jeffrey Ladish
Llama 2-Chat is a collection of large language models that Meta developed and released to the public. While Meta fine-tuned Llama 2-Chat to refuse to output harmful content, we hypothesize that public access to model weights enables bad actors to cheaply circumvent Llama 2-Chat's safeguards and weaponize Llama 2's capabilities for malicious purposes. We demonstrate that it is possible to effectively undo the safety fine-tuning from Llama 2-Chat 13B with less than $200, while retaining its general capabilities. Our results demonstrate that safety-fine tuning is ineffective at preventing misuse when model weights are released publicly. Given that future models will likely have much greater ability to cause harm at scale, it is essential that AI developers address threats from fine-tuning when considering whether to publicly release their model weights.
Read more5/29/2024
🏋️
2
LoRA Fine-tuning Efficiently Undoes Safety Training in Llama 2-Chat 70B
Simon Lermen, Charlie Rogers-Smith, Jeffrey Ladish
AI developers often apply safety alignment procedures to prevent the misuse of their AI systems. For example, before Meta released Llama 2-Chat - a collection of instruction fine-tuned large language models - they invested heavily in safety training, incorporating extensive red-teaming and reinforcement learning from human feedback. We explore the robustness of safety training in language models by subversively fine-tuning Llama 2-Chat. We employ quantized low-rank adaptation (LoRA) as an efficient fine-tuning method. With a budget of less than $200 and using only one GPU, we successfully undo the safety training of Llama 2-Chat models of sizes 7B, 13B, and 70B and on the Mixtral instruct model. Specifically, our fine-tuning technique significantly reduces the rate at which the model refuses to follow harmful instructions. We achieve refusal rates of about 1% for our 70B Llama 2-Chat model on two refusal benchmarks. Simultaneously, our method retains capabilities across two general performance benchmarks. We show that subversive fine-tuning is practical and effective, and hence argue that evaluating risks from fine-tuning should be a core part of risk assessments for releasing model weights. While there is considerable uncertainty about the scope of risks from current models, future models will have significantly more dangerous capabilities.
Read more5/24/2024
0
Badllama 3: removing safety finetuning from Llama 3 in minutes
Dmitrii Volkov
We show that extensive LLM safety fine-tuning is easily subverted when an attacker has access to model weights. We evaluate three state-of-the-art fine-tuning methods-QLoRA, ReFT, and Ortho-and show how algorithmic advances enable constant jailbreaking performance with cuts in FLOPs and optimisation power. We strip safety fine-tuning from Llama 3 8B in one minute and Llama 3 70B in 30 minutes on a single GPU, and sketch ways to reduce this further.
Read more7/2/2024
0
From Representational Harms to Quality-of-Service Harms: A Case Study on Llama 2 Safety Safeguards
Khaoula Chehbouni, Megha Roshan, Emmanuel Ma, Futian Andrew Wei, Afaf Taik, Jackie CK Cheung, Golnoosh Farnadi
Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has led to their widespread adoption in various domains. However, these advancements have also introduced additional safety risks and raised concerns regarding their detrimental impact on already marginalized populations. Despite growing mitigation efforts to develop safety safeguards, such as supervised safety-oriented fine-tuning and leveraging safe reinforcement learning from human feedback, multiple concerns regarding the safety and ingrained biases in these models remain. Furthermore, previous work has demonstrated that models optimized for safety often display exaggerated safety behaviors, such as a tendency to refrain from responding to certain requests as a precautionary measure. As such, a clear trade-off between the helpfulness and safety of these models has been documented in the literature. In this paper, we further investigate the effectiveness of safety measures by evaluating models on already mitigated biases. Using the case of Llama 2 as an example, we illustrate how LLMs' safety responses can still encode harmful assumptions. To do so, we create a set of non-toxic prompts, which we then use to evaluate Llama models. Through our new taxonomy of LLMs responses to users, we observe that the safety/helpfulness trade-offs are more pronounced for certain demographic groups which can lead to quality-of-service harms for marginalized populations.
Read more7/8/2024