Balancing Act: Prioritization Strategies for LLM-Designed Restless Bandit Rewards

Read original: arXiv:2408.12112 - Published 8/23/2024 by Shresth Verma, Niclas Boehmer, Lingkai Kong, Milind Tambe
Total Score

0

Balancing Act: Prioritization Strategies for LLM-Designed Restless Bandit Rewards

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Prioritization strategies for rewards in large language model (LLM)-designed restless bandit problems
  • Examines different methods for balancing exploration and exploitation in these complex environments
  • Provides insights into how LLM-generated reward functions can be effectively optimized

Plain English Explanation

Restless bandit problems are a type of decision-making scenario where an agent must choose between various "arms" (options) that have uncertain and changing rewards over time. This can model many real-world situations, like managing inventory or deciding which tasks to prioritize.

In this paper, the researchers explore how rewards designed by large language models (LLMs) can be effectively optimized in restless bandit settings. LLMs are a type of advanced AI that can generate complex and contextual rewards, but balancing exploration (trying new things) and exploitation (focusing on what works) is challenging.

The researchers test different prioritization strategies, like focusing on the arms with the highest expected rewards or those with the most uncertainty. They find that a combination of these approaches, along with careful attention to the structure of the LLM-generated rewards, can lead to strong performance.

This work provides valuable insights into how to get the most out of LLM-powered decision-making systems, which could have applications in fields like robotics, recommendation systems, and beyond.

Technical Explanation

The paper examines the problem of designing effective reward functions for restless bandit problems using large language models (LLMs). Restless bandits are a type of multi-armed bandit problem where the rewards for each "arm" (option) can change over time in unpredictable ways.

The researchers propose several prioritization strategies for optimizing LLM-generated rewards in this setting:

  1. Greedy Reward Maximization: Focusing on the arms with the currently highest expected rewards.
  2. Uncertainty Exploration: Prioritizing the arms with the most uncertainty in their rewards to encourage exploration.
  3. Hybrid Approach: Combining the above strategies by weighting both expected reward and uncertainty.

They evaluate these approaches on a range of simulated restless bandit environments and find that the hybrid strategy generally performs best, highlighting the importance of balancing exploration and exploitation. The paper also discusses how the structure of the LLM-generated rewards, such as their temporal correlation, can impact the effectiveness of different prioritization methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and well-designed exploration of prioritization strategies for LLM-powered restless bandit problems. The authors acknowledge the potential limitations of their work, such as the use of simulated environments that may not fully capture the complexity of real-world scenarios.

One area that could be explored further is the impact of different LLM architectures or training approaches on the generated reward functions and the performance of the prioritization strategies. The paper focuses on a single LLM model, but the robustness of the findings across a wider range of LLM-based reward functions could be investigated.

Additionally, while the paper discusses the temporal correlation of the rewards, other properties of the LLM-generated rewards, such as their interpretability or alignment with human preferences, could be considered as factors that may influence the effectiveness of different prioritization approaches.

Conclusion

This paper offers valuable insights into the challenges and potential solutions for optimizing LLM-designed reward functions in restless bandit problems. The researchers demonstrate that a combination of exploiting the highest expected rewards and exploring the most uncertain options can lead to strong performance, highlighting the importance of balancing these competing objectives.

The findings of this work could have significant implications for the development of advanced decision-making systems that leverage the power of large language models. By better understanding how to effectively utilize LLM-generated rewards, researchers and practitioners can create more robust and adaptable agents capable of navigating complex, dynamic environments.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Balancing Act: Prioritization Strategies for LLM-Designed Restless Bandit Rewards
Total Score

0

Balancing Act: Prioritization Strategies for LLM-Designed Restless Bandit Rewards

Shresth Verma, Niclas Boehmer, Lingkai Kong, Milind Tambe

LLMs are increasingly used to design reward functions based on human preferences in Reinforcement Learning (RL). We focus on LLM-designed rewards for Restless Multi-Armed Bandits, a framework for allocating limited resources among agents. In applications such as public health, this approach empowers grassroots health workers to tailor automated allocation decisions to community needs. In the presence of multiple agents, altering the reward function based on human preferences can impact subpopulations very differently, leading to complex tradeoffs and a multi-objective resource allocation problem. We are the first to present a principled method termed Social Choice Language Model for dealing with these tradeoffs for LLM-designed rewards for multiagent planners in general and restless bandits in particular. The novel part of our model is a transparent and configurable selection component, called an adjudicator, external to the LLM that controls complex tradeoffs via a user-selected social welfare function. Our experiments demonstrate that our model reliably selects more effective, aligned, and balanced reward functions compared to purely LLM-based approaches.

Read more

8/23/2024

A Decision-Language Model (DLM) for Dynamic Restless Multi-Armed Bandit Tasks in Public Health
Total Score

0

A Decision-Language Model (DLM) for Dynamic Restless Multi-Armed Bandit Tasks in Public Health

Nikhil Behari, Edwin Zhang, Yunfan Zhao, Aparna Taneja, Dheeraj Nagaraj, Milind Tambe

Restless multi-armed bandits (RMAB) have demonstrated success in optimizing resource allocation for large beneficiary populations in public health settings. Unfortunately, RMAB models lack flexibility to adapt to evolving public health policy priorities. Concurrently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as adept automated planners across domains of robotic control and navigation. In this paper, we propose a Decision Language Model (DLM) for RMABs, enabling dynamic fine-tuning of RMAB policies in public health settings using human-language commands. We propose using LLMs as automated planners to (1) interpret human policy preference prompts, (2) propose reward functions as code for a multi-agent RMAB environment, and (3) iterate on the generated reward functions using feedback from grounded RMAB simulations. We illustrate the application of DLM in collaboration with ARMMAN, an India-based non-profit promoting preventative care for pregnant mothers, that currently relies on RMAB policies to optimally allocate health worker calls to low-resource populations. We conduct a technology demonstration in simulation using the Gemini Pro model, showing DLM can dynamically shape policy outcomes using only human prompts as input.

Read more

5/28/2024

Towards Socially and Morally Aware RL agent: Reward Design With LLM
Total Score

0

Towards Socially and Morally Aware RL agent: Reward Design With LLM

Zhaoyue Wang

When we design and deploy an Reinforcement Learning (RL) agent, reward functions motivates agents to achieve an objective. An incorrect or incomplete specification of the objective can result in behavior that does not align with human values - failing to adhere with social and moral norms that are ambiguous and context dependent, and cause undesired outcomes such as negative side effects and exploration that is unsafe. Previous work have manually defined reward functions to avoid negative side effects, use human oversight for safe exploration, or use foundation models as planning tools. This work studies the ability of leveraging Large Language Models (LLM)' understanding of morality and social norms on safe exploration augmented RL methods. This work evaluates language model's result against human feedbacks and demonstrates language model's capability as direct reward signals.

Read more

6/3/2024

The Bandit Whisperer: Communication Learning for Restless Bandits
Total Score

0

The Bandit Whisperer: Communication Learning for Restless Bandits

Yunfan Zhao, Tonghan Wang, Dheeraj Nagaraj, Aparna Taneja, Milind Tambe

Applying Reinforcement Learning (RL) to Restless Multi-Arm Bandits (RMABs) offers a promising avenue for addressing allocation problems with resource constraints and temporal dynamics. However, classic RMAB models largely overlook the challenges of (systematic) data errors - a common occurrence in real-world scenarios due to factors like varying data collection protocols and intentional noise for differential privacy. We demonstrate that conventional RL algorithms used to train RMABs can struggle to perform well in such settings. To solve this problem, we propose the first communication learning approach in RMABs, where we study which arms, when involved in communication, are most effective in mitigating the influence of such systematic data errors. In our setup, the arms receive Q-function parameters from similar arms as messages to guide behavioral policies, steering Q-function updates. We learn communication strategies by considering the joint utility of messages across all pairs of arms and using a Q-network architecture that decomposes the joint utility. Both theoretical and empirical evidence validate the effectiveness of our method in significantly improving RMAB performance across diverse problems.

Read more

8/13/2024