Beyond Human Preferences: Exploring Reinforcement Learning Trajectory Evaluation and Improvement through LLMs

2406.19644

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 7/2/2024 by Zichao Shen, Tianchen Zhu, Qingyun Sun, Shiqi Gao, Jianxin Li
Beyond Human Preferences: Exploring Reinforcement Learning Trajectory Evaluation and Improvement through LLMs

Abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) faces challenges in evaluating policy trajectories within intricate game tasks due to the difficulty in designing comprehensive and precise reward functions. This inherent difficulty curtails the broader application of RL within game environments characterized by diverse constraints. Preference-based reinforcement learning (PbRL) presents a pioneering framework that capitalizes on human preferences as pivotal reward signals, thereby circumventing the need for meticulous reward engineering. However, obtaining preference data from human experts is costly and inefficient, especially under conditions marked by complex constraints. To tackle this challenge, we propose a LLM-enabled automatic preference generation framework named LLM4PG , which harnesses the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to abstract trajectories, rank preferences, and reconstruct reward functions to optimize conditioned policies. Experiments on tasks with complex language constraints demonstrated the effectiveness of our LLM-enabled reward functions, accelerating RL convergence and overcoming stagnation caused by slow or absent progress under original reward structures. This approach mitigates the reliance on specialized human knowledge and demonstrates the potential of LLMs to enhance RL's effectiveness in complex environments in the wild.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores using large language models (LLMs) to evaluate and improve reinforcement learning (RL) trajectories beyond relying solely on human preferences.
  • The researchers propose methods to leverage LLMs for RL trajectory assessment and enhancement, going beyond traditional approaches focused on human-specified rewards.
  • The paper investigates the potential of LLMs to provide more nuanced, contextual, and scalable feedback on RL agent behavior compared to explicit human feedback.

Plain English Explanation

Reinforcement learning (RL) is a type of machine learning where an AI agent learns to make good decisions by trial and error, receiving rewards or punishments for its actions. Traditionally, these rewards have been defined by human experts, who specify what behaviors the AI should aim for.

However, this paper explores going beyond relying only on human-defined rewards. The researchers propose using large language models (LLMs) - powerful AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data - to evaluate and improve RL agent behavior in more nuanced ways.

[The paper discusses related works on using human preferences to guide RL, including the papers "Reinforcement Learning from Diverse Human Preferences", "Tell Me Why: Training Preferences-Based RL from Human Explanations", and "Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning from Preference Human Interactions".]

The key idea is that LLMs can provide more contextualized and scalable feedback on RL agent trajectories compared to explicit human feedback. LLMs may be able to assess an agent's behavior not just based on simple rewards, but by understanding the broader context and intent behind the agent's actions.

For example, an LLM could evaluate whether an RL agent's behavior is aligned with high-level goals, such as being helpful and cooperative, even if those goals are not directly specified in the reward function. The LLM could also suggest ways the agent could improve its behavior to better match these broader objectives.

[The paper also discusses related work on using LLMs for recommender systems and automated driving, including the papers "LLM-Based Recommender System Environment" and "Context Learning for Automated Driving Scenarios".]

By leveraging the capabilities of LLMs, the researchers hope to develop RL systems that can learn more nuanced and contextual behaviors, going beyond what can be achieved through traditional human-defined reward functions alone.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes several methods for using LLMs to evaluate and improve RL agent trajectories:

  1. LLM-based Trajectory Evaluation: The researchers develop an approach to use LLMs to assess the quality of RL agent trajectories, going beyond simple reward maximization. The LLM is trained to provide a fine-grained evaluation of the agent's behavior, considering factors like alignment with high-level objectives, coherence, and safety.

  2. LLM-guided Trajectory Improvement: Building on the LLM-based evaluation, the paper introduces techniques to use the LLM's feedback to directly modify the RL agent's policy, guiding it towards more desirable behaviors. This includes using the LLM's outputs as additional rewards or constraints during the RL training process.

  3. Reward Modeling with LLMs: The researchers explore using LLMs to learn more sophisticated reward functions that capture complex human preferences, going beyond the limited scope of traditional hand-crafted reward functions.

The paper presents experiments demonstrating the effectiveness of these LLM-based approaches, showing that they can lead to RL agents exhibiting more nuanced and contextually appropriate behaviors compared to agents trained solely on human-defined rewards.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to going beyond human-specified rewards in RL, leveraging the capabilities of LLMs to provide more contextualized and scalable feedback. However, the research also acknowledges several important limitations and areas for further exploration:

  • The reliance on LLMs introduces potential biases and limitations inherent in these large models, which may not always align with human values and preferences.
  • Ensuring the safety and robustness of the LLM-guided RL systems, particularly in high-stakes applications, remains an important challenge.
  • The paper does not fully address the potential for LLM-based approaches to amplify or propagate societal biases present in the training data.
  • Further research is needed to understand the long-term implications of RL agents optimizing for LLM-defined objectives, which may diverge from human values over time.

Nonetheless, the paper represents an important step towards developing RL systems that can learn more nuanced and contextual behaviors, going beyond the limitations of traditional human-defined reward functions. Continued research in this direction, with a focus on addressing these critical concerns, could lead to significant advancements in the field of reinforcement learning.

Conclusion

This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) to evaluate and improve reinforcement learning (RL) agent behavior, going beyond relying solely on human-specified rewards. By leveraging the contextual understanding and feedback capabilities of LLMs, the researchers propose methods to assess RL trajectories more holistically and guide agents towards more desirable behaviors.

The proposed approaches demonstrate the potential for LLMs to enable RL systems that can learn more nuanced and aligned behaviors, compared to traditional RL agents trained on limited human-defined rewards. While the research acknowledges important limitations and areas for further exploration, it represents a significant step forward in developing RL systems that can better capture and optimize for complex human preferences and high-level objectives.

As the field of reinforcement learning continues to advance, the integration of LLM-based techniques could lead to transformative breakthroughs in the development of AI systems that can navigate the world in more intelligent, contextual, and value-aligned ways.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🏅

Reinforcement Learning from Diverse Human Preferences

Wanqi Xue, Bo An, Shuicheng Yan, Zhongwen Xu

YC

0

Reddit

0

The complexity of designing reward functions has been a major obstacle to the wide application of deep reinforcement learning (RL) techniques. Describing an agent's desired behaviors and properties can be difficult, even for experts. A new paradigm called reinforcement learning from human preferences (or preference-based RL) has emerged as a promising solution, in which reward functions are learned from human preference labels among behavior trajectories. However, existing methods for preference-based RL are limited by the need for accurate oracle preference labels. This paper addresses this limitation by developing a method for crowd-sourcing preference labels and learning from diverse human preferences. The key idea is to stabilize reward learning through regularization and correction in a latent space. To ensure temporal consistency, a strong constraint is imposed on the reward model that forces its latent space to be close to the prior distribution. Additionally, a confidence-based reward model ensembling method is designed to generate more stable and reliable predictions. The proposed method is tested on a variety of tasks in DMcontrol and Meta-world and has shown consistent and significant improvements over existing preference-based RL algorithms when learning from diverse feedback, paving the way for real-world applications of RL methods.

Read more

5/9/2024

🏋️

Tell my why: Training preferences-based RL with human preferences and step-level explanations

Jakob Karalus

YC

0

Reddit

0

Human-in-the-loop reinforcement learning (HRL) allows the training of agents through various interfaces, even for non-expert humans. Recently, preference-based methods (PBRL), where the human has to give his preference over two trajectories, increased in popularity since they allow training in domains where more direct feedback is hard to formulate. However, the current PBRL methods have limitations and do not provide humans with an expressive interface for giving feedback. With this work, we propose a new preference-based learning method that provides humans with a more expressive interface to provide their preference over trajectories and a factual explanation (or annotation of why they have this preference). These explanations allow the human to explain what parts of the trajectory are most relevant for the preference. We allow the expression of the explanations over individual trajectory steps. We evaluate our method in various simulations using a simulated human oracle (with realistic restrictions), and our results show that our extended feedback can improve the speed of learning. Code & data: github.com/under-rewiev

Read more

5/24/2024

🏅

Multi-turn Reinforcement Learning from Preference Human Feedback

Lior Shani, Aviv Rosenberg, Asaf Cassel, Oran Lang, Daniele Calandriello, Avital Zipori, Hila Noga, Orgad Keller, Bilal Piot, Idan Szpektor, Avinatan Hassidim, Yossi Matias, R'emi Munos

YC

0

Reddit

0

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has become the standard approach for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences, allowing LLMs to demonstrate remarkable abilities in various tasks. Existing methods work by emulating the preferences at the single decision (turn) level, limiting their capabilities in settings that require planning or multi-turn interactions to achieve a long-term goal. In this paper, we address this issue by developing novel methods for Reinforcement Learning (RL) from preference feedback between two full multi-turn conversations. In the tabular setting, we present a novel mirror-descent-based policy optimization algorithm for the general multi-turn preference-based RL problem, and prove its convergence to Nash equilibrium. To evaluate performance, we create a new environment, Education Dialogue, where a teacher agent guides a student in learning a random topic, and show that a deep RL variant of our algorithm outperforms RLHF baselines. Finally, we show that in an environment with explicit rewards, our algorithm recovers the same performance as a reward-based RL baseline, despite relying solely on a weaker preference signal.

Read more

5/24/2024

An LLM-based Recommender System Environment

An LLM-based Recommender System Environment

Nathan Corecco, Giorgio Piatti, Luca A. Lanzendorfer, Flint Xiaofeng Fan, Roger Wattenhofer

YC

0

Reddit

0

Reinforcement learning (RL) has gained popularity in the realm of recommender systems due to its ability to optimize long-term rewards and guide users in discovering relevant content. However, the successful implementation of RL in recommender systems is challenging because of several factors, including the limited availability of online data for training on-policy methods. This scarcity requires expensive human interaction for online model training. Furthermore, the development of effective evaluation frameworks that accurately reflect the quality of models remains a fundamental challenge in recommender systems. To address these challenges, we propose a comprehensive framework for synthetic environments that simulate human behavior by harnessing the capabilities of large language models (LLMs). We complement our framework with in-depth ablation studies and demonstrate its effectiveness with experiments on movie and book recommendations. By utilizing LLMs as synthetic users, this work introduces a modular and novel framework for training RL-based recommender systems. The software, including the RL environment, is publicly available.

Read more

6/5/2024