The Bayesian Learning Rule
2107.04562
4
0
🛠️
Abstract
We show that many machine-learning algorithms are specific instances of a single algorithm called the emph{Bayesian learning rule}. The rule, derived from Bayesian principles, yields a wide-range of algorithms from fields such as optimization, deep learning, and graphical models. This includes classical algorithms such as ridge regression, Newton's method, and Kalman filter, as well as modern deep-learning algorithms such as stochastic-gradient descent, RMSprop, and Dropout. The key idea in deriving such algorithms is to approximate the posterior using candidate distributions estimated by using natural gradients. Different candidate distributions result in different algorithms and further approximations to natural gradients give rise to variants of those algorithms. Our work not only unifies, generalizes, and improves existing algorithms, but also helps us design new ones.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Many machine learning algorithms can be seen as specific instances of a single algorithm called the Bayesian learning rule.
- This rule, derived from Bayesian principles, can yield a wide range of algorithms from fields like optimization, deep learning, and graphical models.
- This includes classical algorithms like ridge regression, Newton's method, and Kalman filter, as well as modern deep learning algorithms like stochastic gradient descent, RMSprop, and Dropout.
- The key idea is to approximate the posterior using candidate distributions estimated by using natural gradients.
- Different candidate distributions result in different algorithms, and further approximations to natural gradients give rise to variants of those algorithms.
- This work not only unifies, generalizes, and improves existing algorithms, but also helps design new ones.
Plain English Explanation
The provided paper shows that many machine learning algorithms, both classical and modern, can be seen as specific cases of a single, more general algorithm called the Bayesian learning rule. This rule is derived from Bayesian principles and can generate a wide variety of algorithms used in optimization, deep learning, and other fields.
For example, the paper demonstrates how algorithms like ridge regression, Newton's method, and the Kalman filter can be generated by the Bayesian learning rule, as well as more modern deep learning algorithms like stochastic gradient descent, RMSprop, and Dropout.
The key idea is to approximate the probability distribution of the model parameters (the "posterior") using candidate distributions that are estimated using natural gradients. Choosing different candidate distributions leads to different algorithms, and further approximations to the natural gradients give rise to variants of those algorithms.
This work is significant because it unifies and generalizes a wide range of existing machine learning algorithms, while also providing a framework for designing new ones. By understanding the underlying Bayesian principles, researchers can more easily develop and improve algorithms to tackle complex problems.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a unifying framework for deriving a wide range of machine learning algorithms from Bayesian principles. The authors show that many algorithms, both classical and modern, can be seen as specific instances of a single algorithm called the Bayesian learning rule.
This rule is derived by approximating the posterior distribution of the model parameters using candidate distributions estimated using natural gradients. Different choices of candidate distributions lead to different algorithms, such as ridge regression, Newton's method, the Kalman filter, stochastic gradient descent, RMSprop, and Dropout.
Furthermore, the authors show that additional approximations to the natural gradients can give rise to variants of these algorithms. This unification not only helps to understand the relationships between different algorithms, but also provides a framework for designing new ones.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through experiments on a range of tasks, including supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning. The results show that the algorithms derived from the Bayesian learning rule can outperform or match the performance of existing state-of-the-art methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling unification of a wide range of machine learning algorithms under the Bayesian learning rule framework. The authors have demonstrated the versatility of this approach by deriving classical algorithms like ridge regression and Kalman filter, as well as modern deep learning algorithms like stochastic gradient descent and Dropout.
One potential limitation of the work is that the derivation of the Bayesian learning rule and the corresponding algorithms may be mathematically complex for some readers. The authors have tried to address this by providing intuitive explanations, but the technical details may still be challenging for a general audience.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the practical implications of this unification or how it might impact the development of new algorithms. While the authors mention the potential for designing new algorithms, they do not provide concrete examples or guidelines on how to do so.
Further research could explore the application of the Bayesian learning rule in specific domains or the development of more user-friendly tools and interfaces for practitioners to leverage this framework. Investigating the potential computational and memory efficiency gains of the unified algorithms could also be an interesting direction for future work.
Overall, the paper presents a valuable contribution to the field of machine learning, as it provides a deeper understanding of the underlying principles that govern a wide range of algorithms. This knowledge can inform the design of more effective and versatile machine learning models, ultimately advancing the state of the art in various applications.
Conclusion
The provided paper demonstrates that many machine learning algorithms, both classical and modern, can be seen as specific instances of a single algorithm called the Bayesian learning rule. This rule, derived from Bayesian principles, can generate a wide range of algorithms used in optimization, deep learning, and other fields.
By unifying these algorithms under a common framework, the paper not only helps to understand the relationships between them, but also provides a foundation for designing new and improved algorithms. The authors have shown that the Bayesian learning rule can yield algorithms that match or outperform existing state-of-the-art methods, making this a significant contribution to the field of machine learning.
While the technical details may be challenging for some readers, the potential impact of this work is substantial. By understanding the underlying Bayesian principles that govern a wide range of machine learning algorithms, researchers and practitioners can develop more robust, flexible, and effective models to tackle complex problems in various domains, from image recognition to natural language processing and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📊
Bayesian Data Selection
Julian Rodemann
0
0
A wide range of machine learning algorithms iteratively add data to the training sample. Examples include semi-supervised learning, active learning, multi-armed bandits, and Bayesian optimization. We embed this kind of data addition into decision theory by framing data selection as a decision problem. This paves the way for finding Bayes-optimal selections of data. For the illustrative case of self-training in semi-supervised learning, we derive the respective Bayes criterion. We further show that deploying this criterion mitigates the issue of confirmation bias by empirically assessing our method for generalized linear models, semi-parametric generalized additive models, and Bayesian neural networks on simulated and real-world data.
6/25/2024
🧪
More Flexible PAC-Bayesian Meta-Learning by Learning Learning Algorithms
Hossein Zakerinia, Amin Behjati, Christoph H. Lampert
0
0
We introduce a new framework for studying meta-learning methods using PAC-Bayesian theory. Its main advantage over previous work is that it allows for more flexibility in how the transfer of knowledge between tasks is realized. For previous approaches, this could only happen indirectly, by means of learning prior distributions over models. In contrast, the new generalization bounds that we prove express the process of meta-learning much more directly as learning the learning algorithm that should be used for future tasks. The flexibility of our framework makes it suitable to analyze a wide range of meta-learning mechanisms and even design new mechanisms. Other than our theoretical contributions we also show empirically that our framework improves the prediction quality in practical meta-learning mechanisms.
5/30/2024
A Unified Theory of Exact Inference and Learning in Exponential Family Latent Variable Models
Sacha Sokoloski
0
0
Bayes' rule describes how to infer posterior beliefs about latent variables given observations, and inference is a critical step in learning algorithms for latent variable models (LVMs). Although there are exact algorithms for inference and learning for certain LVMs such as linear Gaussian models and mixture models, researchers must typically develop approximate inference and learning algorithms when applying novel LVMs. In this paper we study the line that separates LVMs that rely on approximation schemes from those that do not, and develop a general theory of exponential family, latent variable models for which inference and learning may be implemented exactly. Firstly, under mild assumptions about the exponential family form of a given LVM, we derive necessary and sufficient conditions under which the LVM prior is in the same exponential family as its posterior, such that the prior is conjugate to the posterior. We show that all models that satisfy these conditions are constrained forms of a particular class of exponential family graphical model. We then derive general inference and learning algorithms, and demonstrate them on a variety of example models. Finally, we show how to compose our models into graphical models that retain tractable inference and learning. In addition to our theoretical work, we have implemented our algorithms in a collection of libraries with which we provide numerous demonstrations of our theory, and with which researchers may apply our theory in novel statistical settings.
5/1/2024
Scalable Bayesian Learning with posteriors
Samuel Duffield, Kaelan Donatella, Johnathan Chiu, Phoebe Klett, Daniel Simpson
0
0
Although theoretically compelling, Bayesian learning with modern machine learning models is computationally challenging since it requires approximating a high dimensional posterior distribution. In this work, we (i) introduce posteriors, an easily extensible PyTorch library hosting general-purpose implementations making Bayesian learning accessible and scalable to large data and parameter regimes; (ii) present a tempered framing of stochastic gradient Markov chain Monte Carlo, as implemented in posteriors, that transitions seamlessly into optimization and unveils a minor modification to deep ensembles to ensure they are asymptotically unbiased for the Bayesian posterior, and (iii) demonstrate and compare the utility of Bayesian approximations through experiments including an investigation into the cold posterior effect and applications with large language models.
6/4/2024