Bayesian neural networks for predicting uncertainty in full-field material response
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a Bayesian neural network approach to predict uncertainty in full-field material response, which is useful for applications like predicting peak stresses in microstructured materials or efficient uncertainty quantification in medical imaging.
- The key idea is to use Bayesian neural networks, which can capture both the predicted value and the associated uncertainty, to model the relationship between material microstructure and full-field response.
- This allows the model to quantify the uncertainty in the predicted material response, which is important for applications where reliability and safety are critical.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a way to use machine learning to predict how materials will behave under different conditions, and also provide an estimate of how certain or uncertain those predictions are. This is important because in many engineering and materials science applications, it's not enough to just know the predicted behavior - you also need to know how reliable or uncertain that prediction is.
The approach uses a type of neural network called a "Bayesian neural network". Regular neural networks try to find a single set of parameters that best fit the training data. Bayesian neural networks, on the other hand, consider a whole range of possible parameter values and their associated probabilities. This allows the model to not only predict the expected material behavior, but also quantify the uncertainty around that prediction.
For example, imagine trying to predict how strong a new material will be. A regular neural network might just give you a single number for the predicted strength. But a Bayesian neural network would also give you information about how confident it is in that prediction - maybe the strength is very likely to be in a certain range, but there's a small chance it could be significantly higher or lower. This uncertainty information is crucial for applications where reliability and safety are paramount, like designing structures that can withstand earthquakes or medical imaging.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a Bayesian neural network approach to predict the full-field material response and its associated uncertainty from material microstructure. Bayesian neural networks differ from standard neural networks in that they treat the model parameters as random variables with a probability distribution, rather than as single point estimates.
The authors use a deep convolutional encoder network to map the material microstructure to a latent representation, which is then passed through a Bayesian decoder network to predict the full-field material response. The Bayesian decoder network outputs both the predicted response and an estimate of the aleatoric (data) and epistemic (model) uncertainties associated with the prediction.
The model is trained using a Monte Carlo dropout technique, which allows for efficient approximate inference of the Bayesian posterior distribution. This enables the model to quantify the uncertainty in the predicted material response, which is a key advantage over deterministic neural network approaches.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on a synthetic dataset of microstructure-response relationships, as well as a real-world dataset of additively manufactured materials. They show that the Bayesian neural network model can accurately capture the uncertainties in the full-field material response, which can be valuable for applications that require reliable and safe predictions.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach for using Bayesian neural networks to quantify uncertainty in material response predictions. The use of a Bayesian decoder network to output both the predicted response and associated uncertainties is a clever and effective solution.
One potential limitation is the reliance on Monte Carlo dropout for approximate Bayesian inference. While this is a common technique, more sophisticated variational inference methods may be able to provide more accurate posterior estimates. Additionally, the authors only demonstrate the approach on relatively simple microstructure-response relationships; it would be interesting to see how the model performs on more complex, high-dimensional materials data.
Another area for further research could be exploring the interpretability of the learned latent representations and their connection to the underlying physics of the material behavior. Incorporating physical constraints or domain knowledge into the model architecture could also help improve its reliability and robustness.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of computational materials science by showcasing the benefits of Bayesian deep learning for uncertainty quantification in material response prediction. The approach has the potential to enhance the safety and reliability of materials-based engineering applications.
Conclusion
This paper presents a Bayesian neural network approach to predict the full-field material response and associated uncertainties from material microstructure. By treating the model parameters as random variables and using a Bayesian decoder network, the approach can quantify both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties in the material response predictions.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their method on synthetic and real-world materials datasets, showing that the Bayesian neural network can accurately capture the uncertainties in the full-field material response. This capability is crucial for applications where reliability and safety are of paramount importance, such as structural design, medical imaging, and uncertainty quantification in materials science.
Overall, this research represents an important step forward in the use of Bayesian deep learning for materials modeling and simulation, with the potential to significantly enhance the predictive capabilities and reliability of materials-based engineering and scientific applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Bayesian neural networks for predicting uncertainty in full-field material response
George D. Pasparakis, Lori Graham-Brady, Michael D. Shields
Stress and material deformation field predictions are among the most important tasks in computational mechanics. These predictions are typically made by solving the governing equations of continuum mechanics using finite element analysis, which can become computationally prohibitive considering complex microstructures and material behaviors. Machine learning (ML) methods offer potentially cost effective surrogates for these applications. However, existing ML surrogates are either limited to low-dimensional problems and/or do not provide uncertainty estimates in the predictions. This work proposes an ML surrogate framework for stress field prediction and uncertainty quantification for diverse materials microstructures. A modified Bayesian U-net architecture is employed to provide a data-driven image-to-image mapping from initial microstructure to stress field with prediction (epistemic) uncertainty estimates. The Bayesian posterior distributions for the U-net parameters are estimated using three state-of-the-art inference algorithms: the posterior sampling-based Hamiltonian Monte Carlo method and two variational approaches, the Monte-Carlo Dropout method and the Bayes by Backprop algorithm. A systematic comparison of the predictive accuracy and uncertainty estimates for these methods is performed for a fiber reinforced composite material and polycrystalline microstructure application. It is shown that the proposed methods yield predictions of high accuracy compared to the FEA solution, while uncertainty estimates depend on the inference approach. Generally, the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and Bayes by Backprop methods provide consistent uncertainty estimates. Uncertainty estimates from Monte Carlo Dropout, on the other hand, are more difficult to interpret and depend strongly on the method's design.
Read more6/24/2024
↗️
0
Uncertainty Quantification in Multivariable Regression for Material Property Prediction with Bayesian Neural Networks
Longze Li, Jiang Chang, Aleksandar Vakanski, Yachun Wang, Tiankai Yao, Min Xian
With the increased use of data-driven approaches and machine learning-based methods in material science, the importance of reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) of the predicted variables for informed decision-making cannot be overstated. UQ in material property prediction poses unique challenges, including the multi-scale and multi-physics nature of advanced materials, intricate interactions between numerous factors, limited availability of large curated datasets for model training, etc. Recently, Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) have emerged as a promising approach for UQ, offering a probabilistic framework for capturing uncertainties within neural networks. In this work, we introduce an approach for UQ within physics-informed BNNs, which integrates knowledge from governing laws in material modeling to guide the models toward physically consistent predictions. To evaluate the effectiveness of this approach, we present case studies for predicting the creep rupture life of steel alloys. Experimental validation with three datasets of collected measurements from creep tests demonstrates the ability of BNNs to produce accurate point and uncertainty estimates that are competitive or exceed the performance of the conventional method of Gaussian Process Regression. Similarly, we evaluated the suitability of BNNs for UQ in an active learning application and reported competitive performance. The most promising framework for creep life prediction is BNNs based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo approximation of the posterior distribution of network parameters, as it provided more reliable results in comparison to BNNs based on variational inference approximation or related NNs with probabilistic outputs. The codes are available at: https://github.com/avakanski/Creep-uncertainty-quantification.
Read more5/15/2024
🧪
0
Navigating Uncertainties in Machine Learning for Structural Dynamics: A Comprehensive Review of Probabilistic and Non-Probabilistic Approaches in Forward and Inverse Problems
Wang-Ji Yan (State Key Laboratory of Internet of Things for Smart City and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Macau, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Joint Laboratory for Smart Cities, China), Lin-Feng Mei (State Key Laboratory of Internet of Things for Smart City and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Macau), Jiang Mo (State Key Laboratory of Internet of Things for Smart City and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Macau), Costas Papadimitriou (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Thessaly), Ka-Veng Yuen (State Key Laboratory of Internet of Things for Smart City and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Macau, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Joint Laboratory for Smart Cities, China), Michael Beer (Leibniz University Hannover, Institute for Risk and Reliability, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Liverpool, International Joint Research Center for Resilient Infrastructure & International Joint Research Center for Engineering Reliability and Stochastic Mechanics, Tongji University)
In the era of big data, machine learning (ML) has become a powerful tool in various fields, notably impacting structural dynamics. ML algorithms offer advantages by modeling physical phenomena based on data, even in the absence of underlying mechanisms. However, uncertainties such as measurement noise and modeling errors can compromise the reliability of ML predictions, highlighting the need for effective uncertainty awareness to enhance prediction robustness. This paper presents a comprehensive review on navigating uncertainties in ML, categorizing uncertainty-aware approaches into probabilistic methods (including Bayesian and frequentist perspectives) and non-probabilistic methods (such as interval learning and fuzzy learning). Bayesian neural networks, known for their uncertainty quantification and nonlinear mapping capabilities, are emphasized for their superior performance and potential. The review covers various techniques and methodologies for addressing uncertainties in ML, discussing fundamentals and implementation procedures of each method. While providing a concise overview of fundamental concepts, the paper refrains from in-depth critical explanations. Strengths and limitations of each approach are examined, along with their applications in structural dynamic forward problems like response prediction, sensitivity assessment, and reliability analysis, and inverse problems like system identification, model updating, and damage identification. Additionally, the review identifies research gaps and suggests future directions for investigations, aiming to provide comprehensive insights to the research community. By offering an extensive overview of both probabilistic and non-probabilistic approaches, this review aims to assist researchers and practitioners in making informed decisions when utilizing ML techniques to address uncertainties in structural dynamic problems.
Read more8/19/2024
0
Uncertainty-Aware Deep Neural Representations for Visual Analysis of Vector Field Data
Atul Kumar, Siddharth Garg, Soumya Dutta
The widespread use of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) has recently resulted in their application to challenging scientific visualization tasks. While advanced DNNs demonstrate impressive generalization abilities, understanding factors like prediction quality, confidence, robustness, and uncertainty is crucial. These insights aid application scientists in making informed decisions. However, DNNs lack inherent mechanisms to measure prediction uncertainty, prompting the creation of distinct frameworks for constructing robust uncertainty-aware models tailored to various visualization tasks. In this work, we develop uncertainty-aware implicit neural representations to model steady-state vector fields effectively. We comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of two principled deep uncertainty estimation techniques: (1) Deep Ensemble and (2) Monte Carlo Dropout, aimed at enabling uncertainty-informed visual analysis of features within steady vector field data. Our detailed exploration using several vector data sets indicate that uncertainty-aware models generate informative visualization results of vector field features. Furthermore, incorporating prediction uncertainty improves the resilience and interpretability of our DNN model, rendering it applicable for the analysis of non-trivial vector field data sets.
Read more8/13/2024