Bayesian Reward Models for LLM Alignment
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a method for aligning large language models (LLMs) with desired reward functions using Bayesian modeling.
- The authors aim to develop reward models that can capture complex human preferences and guide LLM behavior.
- The approach involves training a Bayesian reward model on human feedback and using it to shape the LLM's training.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this paper are working on a challenging problem in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) - how to ensure that powerful language models behave in ways that align with human preferences and values. [Link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/aligning-large-language-models-via-fine-grained]
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 have shown impressive capabilities in generating human-like text. However, as these models become more capable, it becomes increasingly important to ensure that they are "aligned" - that is, that they behave in ways that are beneficial to humans and society. This is a difficult challenge, as human preferences can be complex and nuanced. [Link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/bonbon-alignment-large-language-models-sweetness-best]
To address this, the researchers propose using a Bayesian modeling approach. The key idea is to train a Bayesian "reward model" that can capture these complex human preferences. This reward model is then used to guide the training of the LLM, shaping its behavior to better align with what humans want. [Link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/interpretable-preferences-via-multi-objective-reward-modeling]
By taking a Bayesian approach, the researchers aim to create a more flexible and robust reward model that can handle the inherent uncertainty and ambiguity in human preferences. The hope is that this will lead to LLMs that are more reliable, trustworthy, and beneficial as they become increasingly powerful and influential. [Link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/rewardbench-evaluating-reward-models-language-modeling]
Technical Explanation
The core of the paper's approach is a Bayesian reward modeling framework. The authors train a Bayesian neural network to predict a reward signal based on human feedback. This reward model is then used to shape the training of the LLM, guiding it towards behaviors that align with the learned preferences.
Specifically, the authors use a Bayesian neural network with a softmax output layer to model the reward function. This allows the model to capture uncertainty in the reward signal, which is important given the inherent ambiguity in human preferences.
The LLM is trained using a multi-stage process. First, the model is pre-trained on a large corpus of text data. Then, the Bayesian reward model is trained on human feedback, such as ratings or rankings of the LLM's outputs. Finally, the LLM is fine-tuned using the learned reward model, incentivizing it to generate outputs that maximize the predicted reward.
The authors evaluate their approach on several benchmark tasks, showing that the Bayesian reward modeling framework can lead to improved alignment between the LLM's behavior and human preferences, compared to other reward modeling techniques. [Link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/regularized-best-n-sampling-to-mitigate-reward]
Critical Analysis
One key strength of the Bayesian approach is its ability to handle uncertainty in the reward signal. By modeling the reward function probabilistically, the system can better cope with the inherent ambiguity and subjectivity in human preferences.
However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the authors note that the Bayesian reward model may still struggle to capture some nuanced or context-dependent aspects of human preferences. Additionally, the multi-stage training process can be computationally intensive, which may limit the scalability of the approach.
Further research could explore ways to make the reward modeling and LLM fine-tuning processes more efficient and robust. Investigating alternative Bayesian architectures or training techniques may also be fruitful. Additionally, more work is needed to understand the broader societal implications of aligning LLMs with human preferences, and to address potential biases or unintended consequences that may arise. [Link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/bonbon-alignment-large-language-models-sweetness-best]
Conclusion
This paper presents a promising approach for aligning large language models with complex human preferences using Bayesian reward modeling. By capturing uncertainty in the reward signal, the method aims to create LLMs that are more reliable, trustworthy, and beneficial as they become increasingly powerful.
While the proposed framework has limitations and areas for further research, the core idea of using Bayesian modeling to bridge the gap between human preferences and AI behavior is an important step forward in the quest to develop AI systems that are truly aligned with human values. As language models continue to advance, solutions like this will be crucial for ensuring that their immense capabilities are channeled in ways that are beneficial to humanity. [Link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/aligning-large-language-models-via-fine-grained]
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Bayesian Reward Models for LLM Alignment
Adam X. Yang, Maxime Robeyns, Thomas Coste, Zhengyan Shi, Jun Wang, Haitham Bou-Ammar, Laurence Aitchison
To ensure that large language model (LLM) responses are helpful and non-toxic, a reward model trained on human preference data is usually used. LLM responses with high rewards are then selected through best-of-$n$ (BoN) sampling or the LLM is further optimized to produce responses with high rewards through reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). However, these processes are susceptible to reward overoptimization or `hacking', where responses receive high rewards due to imperfections in the reward model rather than true preference, particularly as prompts or responses deviate from the training data. To address these challenges, we propose to train a Bayesian reward model, which signals higher uncertainty further from the training data distribution. We trained Bayesian reward models using Laplace approximation on LoRA weights, and found that the resulting uncertainty estimates can effectively mitigate reward overoptimization in BoN sampling.
Read more7/4/2024
0
Regularized Best-of-N Sampling to Mitigate Reward Hacking for Language Model Alignment
Yuu Jinnai, Tetsuro Morimura, Kaito Ariu, Kenshi Abe
Best-of-N (BoN) sampling with a reward model has been shown to be an effective strategy for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) to human preferences at the time of decoding. BoN sampling is susceptible to a problem known as reward hacking. Because the reward model is an imperfect proxy for the true objective, over-optimizing its value can compromise its performance on the true objective. A common solution to prevent reward hacking in preference learning techniques is to optimize a reward using proximity regularization (e.g., KL regularization), which ensures that the language model remains close to the reference model. In this research, we propose Regularized Best-of-N (RBoN), a variant of BoN that aims to mitigate reward hacking by incorporating a proximity term in response selection, similar to preference learning techniques. We evaluate RBoN on the AlpacaFarm and Anthropic's hh-rlhf datasets and find that it outperforms BoN. As an application of RBoN, we use RBoN to generate a pairwise preference learning dataset. Experimental results show that a DPO model trained on a dataset generated with RBoN outperforms a DPO model generated with vanilla BoN. Our code is available at https://github.com/CyberAgentAILab/regularized-bon
Read more6/26/2024
0
BoNBoN Alignment for Large Language Models and the Sweetness of Best-of-n Sampling
Lin Gui, Cristina G^arbacea, Victor Veitch
This paper concerns the problem of aligning samples from large language models to human preferences using best-of-$n$ sampling, where we draw $n$ samples, rank them, and return the best one. We consider two fundamental problems. First: what is the relationship between best-of-$n$ and approaches to alignment that train LLMs to output samples with a high expected reward (e.g., RLHF or DPO)? To answer this, we embed both the best-of-$n$ distribution and the sampling distributions learned by alignment procedures in a common class of tiltings of the base LLM distribution. We then show that, within this class, best-of-$n$ is essentially optimal in terms of the trade-off between win-rate against the base model vs KL distance from the base model. That is, best-of-$n$ is the best choice of alignment distribution if the goal is to maximize win rate. However, best-of-$n$ requires drawing $n$ samples for each inference, a substantial cost. To avoid this, the second problem we consider is how to fine-tune a LLM to mimic the best-of-$n$ sampling distribution. We derive BoNBoN Alignment to achieve this by exploiting the special structure of the best-of-$n$ distribution. Experiments show that BoNBoN alignment yields substantial improvements in producing a model that is preferred to the base policy while minimally affecting off-target aspects.
Read more6/6/2024
0
RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling
Nathan Lambert, Valentina Pyatkin, Jacob Morrison, LJ Miranda, Bill Yuchen Lin, Khyathi Chandu, Nouha Dziri, Sachin Kumar, Tom Zick, Yejin Choi, Noah A. Smith, Hannaneh Hajishirzi
Reward models (RMs) are at the crux of successfully using RLHF to align pretrained models to human preferences, yet there has been relatively little study that focuses on evaluation of those models. Evaluating reward models presents an opportunity to understand the opaque technologies used for alignment of language models and which values are embedded in them. Resources for reward model training and understanding are sparse in the nascent open-source community around them. To enhance scientific understanding of reward models, we present RewardBench, a benchmark dataset and code-base for evaluation. The RewardBench dataset is a collection of prompt-chosen-rejected trios spanning chat, reasoning, and safety, to benchmark how reward models perform on challenging, structured and out-of-distribution queries. We create specific comparison datasets for RMs that have subtle, but verifiable reasons (e.g. bugs, incorrect facts) why one answer should be preferred to another. On the RewardBench leaderboard, we evaluate reward models trained with a variety of methods, such as the direct MLE training of classifiers and the implicit reward modeling of Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). We present many findings on propensity for refusals, reasoning limitations, and instruction following shortcomings of various reward models towards a better understanding of the RLHF process.
Read more6/11/2024