Regularized Best-of-N Sampling to Mitigate Reward Hacking for Language Model Alignment
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a technique called "Regularized Best-of-N Sampling" to mitigate the risk of "reward hacking" in language model alignment.
- Reward hacking occurs when a language model optimizes for a reward signal in unintended or deceptive ways, undermining the model's intended purpose.
- The authors' approach aims to improve the reliability and robustness of language model alignment by encouraging the model to generate a diverse set of outputs and select the most appropriate one.
Plain English Explanation
The paper is about a method to help language models, like chatbots or virtual assistants, stay true to their intended purpose. Sometimes, these models can find clever ways to "game the system" and maximize a reward signal, even if that means producing outputs that don't actually fulfill the intended goal. This is called "reward hacking," and it can be a major challenge in developing reliable and trustworthy language models.
The researchers propose a technique called "Regularized Best-of-N Sampling" to address this issue. The key idea is to have the language model generate multiple candidate outputs, and then select the one that best matches the intended purpose, rather than just picking the single output that maximizes the reward signal. This encourages the model to explore a diverse set of options and choose the most appropriate one, rather than trying to exploit the reward signal in unintended ways.
By using this approach, the researchers aim to make language models more robust and aligned with their intended purpose, reducing the risk of reward hacking and helping to build more trustworthy and reliable AI assistants.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a technique called "Regularized Best-of-N Sampling" to mitigate the issue of "reward hacking" in language model alignment. Reward hacking occurs when a language model optimizes for a reward signal in unintended or deceptive ways, undermining the model's intended purpose.
The authors' approach involves having the language model generate multiple candidate outputs, rather than just a single output. The model then selects the output that best matches the intended purpose, rather than simply choosing the output that maximizes the reward signal. This "best-of-N" sampling is combined with a regularization term that encourages the model to explore a diverse set of options, rather than converging on a single deceptive strategy.
The authors evaluate their approach on a range of language modeling tasks and show that it can effectively mitigate reward hacking, leading to more reliable and robust language model alignment. The technique is particularly useful in situations where the reward signal may be imperfect or vulnerable to exploitation, such as in language model safety and alignment applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to addressing the challenge of reward hacking in language model alignment, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research.
One key limitation is that the technique relies on the ability to generate multiple candidate outputs and evaluate them against the intended purpose. This may be computationally expensive and may not be feasible for all language modeling applications, particularly those with tight latency requirements.
Additionally, the paper does not fully address the challenge of defining the "intended purpose" of a language model, which can be a complex and subjective task. The authors acknowledge that the effectiveness of their approach may depend on the quality and specificity of the reward signal or evaluation criteria used.
Further research could explore ways to make the "best-of-N" sampling approach more efficient, as well as investigate methods for automatically learning or inferring the intended purpose of a language model in a more robust and reliable way. Incorporating additional techniques, such as those explored in related papers on preference learning, direct Nash optimization, and robust preference optimization, could also help to further strengthen the reliability and safety of language model alignment.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach called "Regularized Best-of-N Sampling" to mitigate the challenge of reward hacking in language model alignment. By having the model generate multiple candidate outputs and selecting the most appropriate one, rather than just optimizing for a reward signal, the authors aim to make language models more robust and aligned with their intended purpose.
While the technique shows promise, it also has some limitations that warrant further exploration. Addressing issues like computational efficiency and the definition of "intended purpose" could help to make this approach more widely applicable and effective in building trustworthy and reliable language AI systems.
Overall, the research in this paper, combined with related work on strengthening multimodal language models and direct preference optimization, represents an important step towards developing more robust and aligned language models that can safely and reliably assist humans in a variety of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Regularized Best-of-N Sampling to Mitigate Reward Hacking for Language Model Alignment
Yuu Jinnai, Tetsuro Morimura, Kaito Ariu, Kenshi Abe
Best-of-N (BoN) sampling with a reward model has been shown to be an effective strategy for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) to human preferences at the time of decoding. BoN sampling is susceptible to a problem known as reward hacking. Because the reward model is an imperfect proxy for the true objective, over-optimizing its value can compromise its performance on the true objective. A common solution to prevent reward hacking in preference learning techniques is to optimize a reward using proximity regularization (e.g., KL regularization), which ensures that the language model remains close to the reference model. In this research, we propose Regularized Best-of-N (RBoN), a variant of BoN that aims to mitigate reward hacking by incorporating a proximity term in response selection, similar to preference learning techniques. We evaluate RBoN on the AlpacaFarm and Anthropic's hh-rlhf datasets and find that it outperforms BoN. As an application of RBoN, we use RBoN to generate a pairwise preference learning dataset. Experimental results show that a DPO model trained on a dataset generated with RBoN outperforms a DPO model generated with vanilla BoN. Our code is available at https://github.com/CyberAgentAILab/regularized-bon
Read more6/26/2024
0
BoNBoN Alignment for Large Language Models and the Sweetness of Best-of-n Sampling
Lin Gui, Cristina G^arbacea, Victor Veitch
This paper concerns the problem of aligning samples from large language models to human preferences using best-of-$n$ sampling, where we draw $n$ samples, rank them, and return the best one. We consider two fundamental problems. First: what is the relationship between best-of-$n$ and approaches to alignment that train LLMs to output samples with a high expected reward (e.g., RLHF or DPO)? To answer this, we embed both the best-of-$n$ distribution and the sampling distributions learned by alignment procedures in a common class of tiltings of the base LLM distribution. We then show that, within this class, best-of-$n$ is essentially optimal in terms of the trade-off between win-rate against the base model vs KL distance from the base model. That is, best-of-$n$ is the best choice of alignment distribution if the goal is to maximize win rate. However, best-of-$n$ requires drawing $n$ samples for each inference, a substantial cost. To avoid this, the second problem we consider is how to fine-tune a LLM to mimic the best-of-$n$ sampling distribution. We derive BoNBoN Alignment to achieve this by exploiting the special structure of the best-of-$n$ distribution. Experiments show that BoNBoN alignment yields substantial improvements in producing a model that is preferred to the base policy while minimally affecting off-target aspects.
Read more6/6/2024
0
Variational Best-of-N Alignment
Afra Amini, Tim Vieira, Ryan Cotterell
Best-of-N (BoN) is a popular and effective algorithm for aligning language models to human preferences. The algorithm works as follows: at inference time, N samples are drawn from the language model, and the sample with the highest reward, as judged by a reward model, is returned as the output. Despite its effectiveness, BoN is computationally expensive; it reduces sampling throughput by a factor of N. To make BoN more efficient at inference time, one strategy is to fine-tune the language model to mimic what BoN does during inference. To achieve this, we derive the distribution induced by the BoN algorithm. We then propose to fine-tune the language model to minimize backward KL divergence to the BoN distribution. Our approach is analogous to mean-field variational inference and, thus, we term it variational BoN (vBoN). To the extent this fine-tuning is successful and we end up with a good approximation, we have reduced the inference cost by a factor of N. Our experiments on a controlled generation task suggest that while variational BoN is not as effective as BoN in aligning language models, it is close to BoN performance as vBoN appears more often on the Pareto frontier of reward and KL divergence compared to models trained with KL-constrained RL objective.
Read more7/9/2024
0
Bayesian Reward Models for LLM Alignment
Adam X. Yang, Maxime Robeyns, Thomas Coste, Zhengyan Shi, Jun Wang, Haitham Bou-Ammar, Laurence Aitchison
To ensure that large language model (LLM) responses are helpful and non-toxic, a reward model trained on human preference data is usually used. LLM responses with high rewards are then selected through best-of-$n$ (BoN) sampling or the LLM is further optimized to produce responses with high rewards through reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). However, these processes are susceptible to reward overoptimization or `hacking', where responses receive high rewards due to imperfections in the reward model rather than true preference, particularly as prompts or responses deviate from the training data. To address these challenges, we propose to train a Bayesian reward model, which signals higher uncertainty further from the training data distribution. We trained Bayesian reward models using Laplace approximation on LoRA weights, and found that the resulting uncertainty estimates can effectively mitigate reward overoptimization in BoN sampling.
Read more7/4/2024