Bayesian Semi-supervised learning under nonparanormality

Read original: arXiv:2001.03798 - Published 7/22/2024 by Rui Zhu, Shuvrarghya Ghosh, Subhashis Ghosal
Total Score

0

🛠️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a Bayesian semi-supervised learning algorithm for binary classification problems.
  • The method assumes the observations follow two multivariate normal distributions depending on their true class labels after an unknown transformation.
  • The proposed algorithm uses both labeled and unlabeled data to train the model.
  • An extensive simulation study compares the method to other semi-supervised learning techniques.
  • The method is also applied to real-world datasets on breast cancer diagnosis and signal classification.

Plain English Explanation

In machine learning, there are two main types of data: labeled data, where the correct answers are provided, and unlabeled data, where the answers are unknown. Semi-supervised learning is a technique that tries to use both labeled and unlabeled data to train a model, potentially improving its performance.

This paper presents a new semi-supervised learning algorithm that can be used for binary classification problems, such as determining whether a medical image shows a healthy or cancerous condition. The key idea is to assume that the observed data follows two different normal distributions, depending on the true (but unknown) class label of each data point. The algorithm then tries to infer the parameters of these distributions, as well as the class labels of the unlabeled data, in a Bayesian framework.

The method works by first transforming the data in some unknown way, and then modeling the transformed data as coming from two different normal distributions. The algorithm learns the parameters of these distributions, as well as the class labels of the unlabeled data, by using a statistical technique called Gibbs sampling. This allows the model to take advantage of both the labeled and unlabeled data to make better predictions.

The authors compare their method to other semi-supervised learning techniques using simulated data, as well as real-world datasets on breast cancer diagnosis and signal classification. They find that their proposed algorithm generally outperforms the other methods, suggesting it could be a useful tool for a variety of binary classification problems where some of the data is unlabeled.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a Bayesian semi-supervised learning algorithm that can be applied to any binary classification problem. The authors assume the observations follow two multivariate normal distributions, depending on their true class labels, after some common unknown transformation is applied to each component of the observation vector.

The transformation function is expanded using a B-splines series, and a prior is placed on the coefficients. A normal prior is used for the coefficients, with constraints to ensure normality and identifiability. The precision matrices of the two Gaussian distributions have a conjugate Wishart prior, while the means have improper uniform priors.

This results in a conditionally conjugate posterior distribution, which allows the use of a Gibbs sampler aided by a data augmentation technique to infer the model parameters and class labels of the unlabeled data.

The proposed method is evaluated through an extensive simulation study, where it is compared to several other semi-supervised learning techniques, including semi-supervised contrastive learning and probabilistic semi-supervised learning. The authors also apply their method to real-world datasets on breast cancer diagnosis and signal classification.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel Bayesian semi-supervised learning algorithm that appears to outperform other methods in the experiments. However, the authors acknowledge several limitations and caveats:

  • The method assumes the observations follow a specific parametric form (two multivariate normal distributions), which may not hold in all real-world scenarios.
  • The performance of the algorithm is heavily dependent on the choice of the B-splines basis and the prior distributions, which can be challenging to tune in practice.
  • The paper does not explore the algorithm's sensitivity to the amount of labeled data available or the degree of class imbalance, which are important practical considerations.
  • The computational complexity of the Gibbs sampling approach may limit the scalability of the method to large-scale problems.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss potential ethical concerns around the application of semi-supervised learning techniques, such as issues related to data privacy or fairness.

Overall, the proposed algorithm represents an interesting contribution to the field of semi-supervised learning, but further research would be needed to better understand its strengths, limitations, and practical applicability in real-world settings.

Conclusion

This paper presents a new Bayesian semi-supervised learning algorithm for binary classification problems. The method assumes the observed data follows a specific parametric form and uses both labeled and unlabeled data to train the model, potentially improving its predictive performance.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through extensive simulations and real-world applications, showing that it can outperform other semi-supervised learning techniques. However, the method also has some limitations, such as its dependence on specific modeling assumptions and potential scalability issues.

Overall, the paper contributes a novel semi-supervised learning algorithm that could be a useful tool for a variety of binary classification tasks, particularly when some of the data is unlabeled. Further research is needed to explore the broader applicability and practical implications of this approach.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛠️

Total Score

0

Bayesian Semi-supervised learning under nonparanormality

Rui Zhu, Shuvrarghya Ghosh, Subhashis Ghosal

Semi-supervised learning is a model training method that uses both labeled and unlabeled data. This paper proposes a fully Bayes semi-supervised learning algorithm that can be applied to any multi-category classification problem. We assume the labels are missing at random when using unlabeled data in a semi-supervised setting. Suppose we have $K$ classes in the data. We assume that the observations follow $K$ multivariate normal distributions depending on their true class labels after some common unknown transformation is applied to each component of the observation vector. The function is expanded in a B-splines series, and a prior is added to the coefficients. We consider a normal prior on the coefficients and constrain the values to meet the normality and identifiability constraints requirement. The precision matrices of the Gaussian distributions are given a conjugate Wishart prior, while the means are given the improper uniform prior. The resulting posterior is still conditionally conjugate, and the Gibbs sampler aided by a data-augmentation technique can thus be adopted. An extensive simulation study compares the proposed method with several other available methods. The proposed method is also applied to real datasets on diagnosing breast cancer and classification of signals. We conclude that the proposed method has a better prediction accuracy in various cases.

Read more

7/22/2024

Improved Graph-based semi-supervised learning Schemes
Total Score

0

Improved Graph-based semi-supervised learning Schemes

Farid Bozorgnia

In this work, we improve the accuracy of several known algorithms to address the classification of large datasets when few labels are available. Our framework lies in the realm of graph-based semi-supervised learning. With novel modifications on Gaussian Random Fields Learning and Poisson Learning algorithms, we increase the accuracy and create more robust algorithms. Experimental results demonstrate the efficiency and superiority of the proposed methods over conventional graph-based semi-supervised techniques, especially in the context of imbalanced datasets.

Read more

7/2/2024

📊

Total Score

0

Making Better Use of Unlabelled Data in Bayesian Active Learning

Freddie Bickford Smith, Adam Foster, Tom Rainforth

Fully supervised models are predominant in Bayesian active learning. We argue that their neglect of the information present in unlabelled data harms not just predictive performance but also decisions about what data to acquire. Our proposed solution is a simple framework for semi-supervised Bayesian active learning. We find it produces better-performing models than either conventional Bayesian active learning or semi-supervised learning with randomly acquired data. It is also easier to scale up than the conventional approach. As well as supporting a shift towards semi-supervised models, our findings highlight the importance of studying models and acquisition methods in conjunction.

Read more

4/29/2024

Semi-Supervised Sparse Gaussian Classification: Provable Benefits of Unlabeled Data
Total Score

0

Semi-Supervised Sparse Gaussian Classification: Provable Benefits of Unlabeled Data

Eyar Azar, Boaz Nadler

The premise of semi-supervised learning (SSL) is that combining labeled and unlabeled data yields significantly more accurate models. Despite empirical successes, the theoretical understanding of SSL is still far from complete. In this work, we study SSL for high dimensional sparse Gaussian classification. To construct an accurate classifier a key task is feature selection, detecting the few variables that separate the two classes. % For this SSL setting, we analyze information theoretic lower bounds for accurate feature selection as well as computational lower bounds, assuming the low-degree likelihood hardness conjecture. % Our key contribution is the identification of a regime in the problem parameters (dimension, sparsity, number of labeled and unlabeled samples) where SSL is guaranteed to be advantageous for classification. Specifically, there is a regime where it is possible to construct in polynomial time an accurate SSL classifier. However, % any computationally efficient supervised or unsupervised learning schemes, that separately use only the labeled or unlabeled data would fail. Our work highlights the provable benefits of combining labeled and unlabeled data for {classification and} feature selection in high dimensions. We present simulations that complement our theoretical analysis.

Read more

9/6/2024