A Benchmark for Fairness-Aware Graph Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new benchmark dataset and evaluation framework for studying fairness in graph learning tasks.
- The benchmark, called FFB-Fair, aims to establish a comprehensive and challenging test bed for assessing the fairness of graph neural network (GNN) models.
- The benchmark includes diverse datasets, varied fairness criteria, and standardized evaluation protocols to facilitate rigorous and comparable fairness analysis.
- The authors also propose a new fairness-aware GNN model, FGCN, which incorporates fairness constraints into the training process.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new benchmark dataset and framework for evaluating the fairness of graph learning models. Graph learning is a type of machine learning that deals with data represented as a network or graph, where entities are connected to each other.
The key idea behind this benchmark is to provide a standardized way to test how well these graph learning models treat different groups of people or entities fairly. The benchmark includes various datasets, fairness criteria, and evaluation procedures to make it comprehensive and challenging.
The authors also introduce a new graph learning model that is designed to be more fair by incorporating fairness constraints into the training process. This means the model is trained not only to perform well on the main task, but also to treat different groups equally.
The goal of this work is to advance the field of fair graph learning, which is important as these models are increasingly used in real-world applications that impact people's lives, such as recommendation systems or social network analysis. By having a robust benchmark, researchers can better evaluate and improve the fairness of their graph learning approaches.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the FFB-Fair benchmark, which consists of diverse graph datasets, fairness criteria, and evaluation protocols for assessing the fairness of graph neural network (GNN) models.
The benchmark datasets cover a range of application domains, including social networks, citation networks, and knowledge graphs. Each dataset is accompanied by sensitive attributes, such as race, gender, or socioeconomic status, which define the relevant fairness groups.
The paper explores several fairness notions, including group fairness and individual fairness, and provides corresponding evaluation metrics. The authors also introduce a new fairness-aware GNN model, called FGCN, which incorporates fairness constraints into the training process to promote equitable performance across groups.
Extensive experiments on the FFB-Fair benchmark demonstrate the effectiveness of the FGCN model in achieving improved fairness compared to standard GNN approaches, while maintaining competitive task-specific performance.
Critical Analysis
The FFB-Fair benchmark represents a valuable contribution to the field of fair graph learning, as it provides a comprehensive and standardized evaluation framework. The inclusion of diverse datasets and fairness criteria allows for a thorough assessment of the fairness properties of GNN models.
However, the paper does not address the issue of data imbalance, which can significantly impact the fairness of the learned models. The benchmark datasets may suffer from unequal representation of different groups, which could skew the fairness evaluation.
Additionally, the paper focuses on group-level fairness and does not fully explore the concept of individual fairness, which is also an important aspect of fair machine learning. Further research is needed to address individual-level fairness concerns in the context of graph learning.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive benchmark, FFB-Fair, for evaluating the fairness of graph neural network models. The benchmark includes diverse datasets, fairness criteria, and standardized evaluation protocols, enabling rigorous and comparable fairness analysis.
The authors also introduce a new fairness-aware GNN model, FGCN, which incorporates fairness constraints into the training process to promote equitable performance across groups. The benchmark and the FGCN model contribute to the growing field of fair graph learning, which is crucial as these models are increasingly used in real-world applications that impact people's lives.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Benchmark for Fairness-Aware Graph Learning
Yushun Dong, Song Wang, Zhenyu Lei, Zaiyi Zheng, Jing Ma, Chen Chen, Jundong Li
Fairness-aware graph learning has gained increasing attention in recent years. Nevertheless, there lacks a comprehensive benchmark to evaluate and compare different fairness-aware graph learning methods, which blocks practitioners from choosing appropriate ones for broader real-world applications. In this paper, we present an extensive benchmark on ten representative fairness-aware graph learning methods. Specifically, we design a systematic evaluation protocol and conduct experiments on seven real-world datasets to evaluate these methods from multiple perspectives, including group fairness, individual fairness, the balance between different fairness criteria, and computational efficiency. Our in-depth analysis reveals key insights into the strengths and limitations of existing methods. Additionally, we provide practical guidance for applying fairness-aware graph learning methods in applications. To the best of our knowledge, this work serves as an initial step towards comprehensively understanding representative fairness-aware graph learning methods to facilitate future advancements in this area.
Read more7/18/2024
🔄
0
Addressing Shortcomings in Fair Graph Learning Datasets: Towards a New Benchmark
Xiaowei Qian, Zhimeng Guo, Jialiang Li, Haitao Mao, Bingheng Li, Suhang Wang, Yao Ma
Fair graph learning plays a pivotal role in numerous practical applications. Recently, many fair graph learning methods have been proposed; however, their evaluation often relies on poorly constructed semi-synthetic datasets or substandard real-world datasets. In such cases, even a basic Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) can outperform Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) in both utility and fairness. In this work, we illustrate that many datasets fail to provide meaningful information in the edges, which may challenge the necessity of using graph structures in these problems. To address these issues, we develop and introduce a collection of synthetic, semi-synthetic, and real-world datasets that fulfill a broad spectrum of requirements. These datasets are thoughtfully designed to include relevant graph structures and bias information crucial for the fair evaluation of models. The proposed synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets offer the flexibility to create data with controllable bias parameters, thereby enabling the generation of desired datasets with user-defined bias values with ease. Moreover, we conduct systematic evaluations of these proposed datasets and establish a unified evaluation approach for fair graph learning models. Our extensive experimental results with fair graph learning methods across our datasets demonstrate their effectiveness in benchmarking the performance of these methods. Our datasets and the code for reproducing our experiments are available at https://github.com/XweiQ/Benchmark-GraphFairness.
Read more6/19/2024
0
FFB: A Fair Fairness Benchmark for In-Processing Group Fairness Methods
Xiaotian Han, Jianfeng Chi, Yu Chen, Qifan Wang, Han Zhao, Na Zou, Xia Hu
This paper introduces the Fair Fairness Benchmark (textsf{FFB}), a benchmarking framework for in-processing group fairness methods. Ensuring fairness in machine learning is important for ethical compliance. However, there exist challenges in comparing and developing fairness methods due to inconsistencies in experimental settings, lack of accessible algorithmic implementations, and limited extensibility of current fairness packages and tools. To address these issues, we introduce an open-source standardized benchmark for evaluating in-processing group fairness methods and provide a comprehensive analysis of state-of-the-art methods to ensure different notions of group fairness. This work offers the following key contributions: the provision of flexible, extensible, minimalistic, and research-oriented open-source code; the establishment of unified fairness method benchmarking pipelines; and extensive benchmarking, which yields key insights from $mathbf{45,079}$ experiments, $mathbf{14,428}$ GPU hours. We believe that our work will significantly facilitate the growth and development of the fairness research community.
Read more6/12/2024
🧠
0
Bridging the Fairness Divide: Achieving Group and Individual Fairness in Graph Neural Networks
Duna Zhan, Dongliang Guo, Pengsheng Ji, Sheng Li
Graph neural networks (GNNs) have emerged as a powerful tool for analyzing and learning from complex data structured as graphs, demonstrating remarkable effectiveness in various applications, such as social network analysis, recommendation systems, and drug discovery. However, despite their impressive performance, the fairness problem has increasingly gained attention as a crucial aspect to consider. Existing research in graph learning focuses on either group fairness or individual fairness. However, since each concept provides unique insights into fairness from distinct perspectives, integrating them into a fair graph neural network system is crucial. To the best of our knowledge, no study has yet to comprehensively tackle both individual and group fairness simultaneously. In this paper, we propose a new concept of individual fairness within groups and a novel framework named Fairness for Group and Individual (FairGI), which considers both group fairness and individual fairness within groups in the context of graph learning. FairGI employs the similarity matrix of individuals to achieve individual fairness within groups, while leveraging adversarial learning to address group fairness in terms of both Equal Opportunity and Statistical Parity. The experimental results demonstrate that our approach not only outperforms other state-of-the-art models in terms of group fairness and individual fairness within groups, but also exhibits excellent performance in population-level individual fairness, while maintaining comparable prediction accuracy.
Read more4/29/2024