Addressing Shortcomings in Fair Graph Learning Datasets: Towards a New Benchmark
0
🔄
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the limitations of existing datasets for evaluating fairness in graph neural network (GNN) models, and proposes a new benchmark to address these shortcomings.
- The authors identify issues with the data distribution, ground truth labels, and evaluation metrics used in popular fairness-aware GNN datasets.
- They introduce a new benchmark, called Fair-GNN-Bench, which aims to provide a more comprehensive and realistic evaluation framework for fair GNN models.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at the shortcomings of the datasets that researchers currently use to test how fair their graph neural network (GNN) models are. Graph neural networks are a type of machine learning model that can analyze and make predictions on data that is structured in a graph format, such as social networks or transportation networks.
The researchers found that the existing fairness-focused GNN datasets have some problems. For example, the data may not accurately represent the real-world distribution of features and labels, and the metrics used to evaluate fairness may not capture all the relevant aspects.
To address these issues, the researchers propose a new benchmark dataset called Fair-GNN-Bench. This new dataset is designed to provide a more realistic and comprehensive way to test the fairness of GNN models. The goal is to help researchers develop GNN models that are truly fair and unbiased when used in real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper first discusses the issues with the evaluation settings of popular graph fairness datasets, such as IGL-Bench, FairGT, and Bridging the Fairness Divide. The authors identify problems with the data distribution, ground truth labels, and evaluation metrics used in these datasets.
To address these limitations, the authors introduce Fair-GNN-Bench, a new benchmark for evaluating fairness-aware GNN models. The benchmark consists of several graph datasets with different characteristics, such as node attributes, graph structures, and fairness-related labels.
The authors describe the process of constructing the Fair-GNN-Bench datasets, including the data generation procedure, fairness-related label assignment, and evaluation protocols. They also discuss the use of Equipping Federated Graph Neural Networks with Structure-Aware techniques to improve the fairness of GNN models on these datasets.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough analysis of the shortcomings in existing graph fairness datasets and proposes a new benchmark that addresses these issues. The authors have done a commendable job in identifying the key problems, such as the unrealistic data distributions and the limited scope of fairness evaluation metrics.
However, the paper does not delve into the potential limitations of the Fair-GNN-Bench dataset itself. For example, the data generation process and the fairness label assignment may still introduce biases that are not fully captured by the current evaluation protocols. Additionally, the benchmark may not cover all the possible fairness-related challenges that GNN models might face in real-world applications.
Further research is needed to explore the generalizability of the Fair-GNN-Bench and its ability to accurately measure the fairness of GNN models. The paper could also benefit from a more in-depth discussion of the potential societal implications of developing fair GNN models and the ethical considerations involved in this process.
Conclusion
This paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of fair graph learning by identifying the limitations of existing datasets and proposing a new benchmark, Fair-GNN-Bench, to address these shortcomings. The new benchmark aims to provide a more comprehensive and realistic evaluation framework for assessing the fairness of GNN models, which is crucial as these models are increasingly being deployed in real-world applications that have significant societal impact.
The development of Fair-GNN-Bench is an important step towards ensuring that GNN models are not only accurate but also fair and unbiased. The adoption of this benchmark by the research community can help drive the development of more equitable and responsible graph learning technologies, with the potential to benefit a wide range of domains, from social networks to transportation systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔄
0
Addressing Shortcomings in Fair Graph Learning Datasets: Towards a New Benchmark
Xiaowei Qian, Zhimeng Guo, Jialiang Li, Haitao Mao, Bingheng Li, Suhang Wang, Yao Ma
Fair graph learning plays a pivotal role in numerous practical applications. Recently, many fair graph learning methods have been proposed; however, their evaluation often relies on poorly constructed semi-synthetic datasets or substandard real-world datasets. In such cases, even a basic Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) can outperform Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) in both utility and fairness. In this work, we illustrate that many datasets fail to provide meaningful information in the edges, which may challenge the necessity of using graph structures in these problems. To address these issues, we develop and introduce a collection of synthetic, semi-synthetic, and real-world datasets that fulfill a broad spectrum of requirements. These datasets are thoughtfully designed to include relevant graph structures and bias information crucial for the fair evaluation of models. The proposed synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets offer the flexibility to create data with controllable bias parameters, thereby enabling the generation of desired datasets with user-defined bias values with ease. Moreover, we conduct systematic evaluations of these proposed datasets and establish a unified evaluation approach for fair graph learning models. Our extensive experimental results with fair graph learning methods across our datasets demonstrate their effectiveness in benchmarking the performance of these methods. Our datasets and the code for reproducing our experiments are available at https://github.com/XweiQ/Benchmark-GraphFairness.
Read more6/19/2024
0
A Benchmark for Fairness-Aware Graph Learning
Yushun Dong, Song Wang, Zhenyu Lei, Zaiyi Zheng, Jing Ma, Chen Chen, Jundong Li
Fairness-aware graph learning has gained increasing attention in recent years. Nevertheless, there lacks a comprehensive benchmark to evaluate and compare different fairness-aware graph learning methods, which blocks practitioners from choosing appropriate ones for broader real-world applications. In this paper, we present an extensive benchmark on ten representative fairness-aware graph learning methods. Specifically, we design a systematic evaluation protocol and conduct experiments on seven real-world datasets to evaluate these methods from multiple perspectives, including group fairness, individual fairness, the balance between different fairness criteria, and computational efficiency. Our in-depth analysis reveals key insights into the strengths and limitations of existing methods. Additionally, we provide practical guidance for applying fairness-aware graph learning methods in applications. To the best of our knowledge, this work serves as an initial step towards comprehensively understanding representative fairness-aware graph learning methods to facilitate future advancements in this area.
Read more7/18/2024
🧠
0
Fair Graph Neural Network with Supervised Contrastive Regularization
Mahdi Tavassoli Kejani (UT3), Fadi Dornaika (IMT), Jean-Michel Loubes (IMT)
In recent years, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have made significant advancements, particularly in tasks such as node classification, link prediction, and graph representation. However, challenges arise from biases that can be hidden not only in the node attributes but also in the connections between entities. Therefore, ensuring fairness in graph neural network learning has become a critical problem. To address this issue, we propose a novel model for training fairness-aware GNN, which enhances the Counterfactual Augmented Fair Graph Neural Network Framework (CAF). Our approach integrates Supervised Contrastive Loss and Environmental Loss to enhance both accuracy and fairness. Experimental validation on three real datasets demonstrates the superiority of our proposed model over CAF and several other existing graph-based learning methods.
Read more4/10/2024
0
Rethinking Fair Graph Neural Networks from Re-balancing
Zhixun Li, Yushun Dong, Qiang Liu, Jeffrey Xu Yu
Driven by the powerful representation ability of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), plentiful GNN models have been widely deployed in many real-world applications. Nevertheless, due to distribution disparities between different demographic groups, fairness in high-stake decision-making systems is receiving increasing attention. Although lots of recent works devoted to improving the fairness of GNNs and achieved considerable success, they all require significant architectural changes or additional loss functions requiring more hyper-parameter tuning. Surprisingly, we find that simple re-balancing methods can easily match or surpass existing fair GNN methods. We claim that the imbalance across different demographic groups is a significant source of unfairness, resulting in imbalanced contributions from each group to the parameters updating. However, these simple re-balancing methods have their own shortcomings during training. In this paper, we propose FairGB, Fair Graph Neural Network via re-Balancing, which mitigates the unfairness of GNNs by group balancing. Technically, FairGB consists of two modules: counterfactual node mixup and contribution alignment loss. Firstly, we select counterfactual pairs across inter-domain and inter-class, and interpolate the ego-networks to generate new samples. Guided by analysis, we can reveal the debiasing mechanism of our model by the causal view and prove that our strategy can make sensitive attributes statistically independent from target labels. Secondly, we reweigh the contribution of each group according to gradients. By combining these two modules, they can mutually promote each other. Experimental results on benchmark datasets show that our method can achieve state-of-the-art results concerning both utility and fairness metrics. Code is available at https://github.com/ZhixunLEE/FairGB.
Read more7/17/2024