Benchmarking AIGC Video Quality Assessment: A Dataset and Unified Model

Overview

• The paper presents a new dataset and unified model for benchmarking AI-generated content (AIGC) video quality assessment.
• The dataset, called AIGC-VQA, contains a diverse set of AIGC videos with corresponding subjective quality scores.
• The authors also propose a unified model that can effectively assess the quality of AIGC videos.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers have developed a new way to evaluate the quality of AI-generated videos. This is important because as AI technology advances, there will be more and more AI-created videos out there, and we need a reliable way to measure how good they are.

The researchers created a dataset of AIGC videos and had people watch and rate the quality of these videos. This dataset, called AIGC-VQA, provides a benchmark that can be used to test different methods for assessing video quality.

The researchers also developed a unified model that can analyze AIGC videos and give them a quality score. This model takes into account various factors that contribute to video quality, like visual harmony, and can provide a more comprehensive assessment than previous methods.

Overall, this work provides important tools for evaluating the quality of AI-generated videos, which will become increasingly relevant as AIGC technologies continue to advance. These tools can help ensure that AI-created videos meet high standards and are useful for a variety of applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the AIGC-VQA dataset, which consists of a diverse set of AIGC videos with corresponding subjective quality scores obtained through crowdsourcing. The dataset covers a range of video genres, including animation, gaming, and real-world footage, and includes both high and low-quality samples.

To address the task of AIGC video quality assessment, the authors propose a unified model that combines multiple quality assessment modules, such as those focused on visual harmony, object quality, and temporal consistency. This model is trained on the AIGC-VQA dataset and can provide a comprehensive evaluation of AIGC video quality.

The paper also presents extensive experiments and analyses to benchmark the performance of the proposed unified model and compare it to existing video quality assessment methods. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the unified model in accurately predicting the subjective quality of AIGC videos, outperforming state-of-the-art approaches.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable contribution to the field of AIGC video quality assessment by introducing a high-quality dataset and a unified model that can effectively evaluate the quality of AI-generated videos. However, the authors acknowledge that the dataset is limited in size and may not capture the full diversity of AIGC videos that could emerge in the future.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential biases or limitations in the crowdsourcing process used to collect the subjective quality scores. It would be important to consider how factors such as viewer demographics, video content, and task design might impact the reliability and generalizability of the subjective ratings.

Further research could explore the robustness of the unified model to various types of AIGC videos, including those generated by different AI systems or in different domains. Investigating the model's ability to generalize to unseen video content or to handle emerging AIGC technologies would help validate its long-term utility.

Conclusion

This paper presents a significant step forward in the assessment of AIGC video quality. The AIGC-VQA dataset and the proposed unified model provide a robust framework for benchmarking and evaluating the performance of AI-generated videos. These tools can contribute to the development of more reliable and high-quality AIGC systems, ultimately benefiting a wide range of applications and industries that rely on video content.