Benchmarking Complex Instruction-Following with Multiple Constraints Composition
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a new benchmark for evaluating the ability of language models to follow complex instructions with multiple constraints.
- The benchmark, called C^3, aims to go beyond existing instruction-following tasks by introducing a more challenging and realistic setting.
- The authors evaluate several state-of-the-art models on the C^3 benchmark and provide insights into their strengths and weaknesses.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a new way to test how well AI language models can follow complex instructions. Existing tests often focus on simple, straightforward instructions, but in the real world, instructions can be much more complicated and have multiple requirements that need to be met at the same time.
The C^3 benchmark introduces a more challenging scenario where the language model is given an instruction with several different constraints it needs to satisfy. For example, the model might be asked to "Find a large, red apple that is not bruised and place it in the basket on the counter." This requires the model to not only understand the instruction, but also identify an object that matches all the specified criteria and then carry out the requested action.
By evaluating language models on this more complex benchmark, the researchers can get a better sense of the models' true capabilities and limitations when it comes to following instructions in realistic, multi-faceted scenarios. This could help advance the development of AI systems that can better assist humans with everyday tasks that involve following detailed, nuanced instructions.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new benchmark called C^3 (Composition of Complex Constraints) for evaluating language models' ability to follow instructions with multiple constraints.
The C^3 benchmark consists of a diverse set of instructions that require the model to satisfy a combination of constraints, such as object properties, spatial relationships, and actions to perform. This is in contrast to many existing instruction-following benchmarks, which tend to focus on simpler, single-constraint scenarios.
The authors evaluate several state-of-the-art language models, including FollowBench, MIA-Bench, and CONIFER, on the C^3 benchmark. They analyze the models' performance and identify key strengths and weaknesses, providing insights into the current state of instruction-following capabilities in language models.
Critical Analysis
The C^3 benchmark represents an important step in the evolution of instruction-following benchmarks, as it addresses the limitations of existing tasks by introducing more complex, realistic scenarios. However, the paper acknowledges several caveats and areas for further research.
One potential limitation is the scope of the benchmark, which may not fully capture the diversity of real-world instructions and constraints that language models would need to handle. Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential biases or fairness considerations that could arise in these types of benchmarks.
Furthermore, the paper does not provide a thorough analysis of the specific weaknesses of the evaluated models, which could limit the usefulness of the findings for researchers and developers looking to improve instruction-following capabilities.
Future work could explore ways to expand the C^3 benchmark, incorporate more diverse and challenging instructions, and conduct a more comprehensive analysis of model performance and error patterns. This could help drive the development of more robust and capable language models for real-world instruction-following applications.
Conclusion
The C^3 benchmark presented in this paper represents an important advancement in the evaluation of language models' instruction-following abilities. By introducing a more complex and realistic setting with multiple constraints, the benchmark can provide valuable insights into the current state of the technology and guide future research and development.
The findings from this paper suggest that while existing state-of-the-art models have made progress in instruction-following, they still struggle with the nuanced challenges posed by the C^3 benchmark. Continued innovation in this area could lead to language models that are better equipped to assist humans with a wide range of real-world tasks that involve following detailed, multi-faceted instructions.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Benchmarking Complex Instruction-Following with Multiple Constraints Composition
Bosi Wen, Pei Ke, Xiaotao Gu, Lindong Wu, Hao Huang, Jinfeng Zhou, Wenchuang Li, Binxin Hu, Wendy Gao, Jiaxin Xu, Yiming Liu, Jie Tang, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
Instruction following is one of the fundamental capabilities of large language models (LLMs). As the ability of LLMs is constantly improving, they have been increasingly applied to deal with complex human instructions in real-world scenarios. Therefore, how to evaluate the ability of complex instruction-following of LLMs has become a critical research problem. Existing benchmarks mainly focus on modeling different types of constraints in human instructions while neglecting the composition of different constraints, which is an indispensable constituent in complex instructions. To this end, we propose ComplexBench, a benchmark for comprehensively evaluating the ability of LLMs to follow complex instructions composed of multiple constraints. We propose a hierarchical taxonomy for complex instructions, including 4 constraint types, 19 constraint dimensions, and 4 composition types, and manually collect a high-quality dataset accordingly. To make the evaluation reliable, we augment LLM-based evaluators with rules to effectively verify whether generated texts can satisfy each constraint and composition. Furthermore, we obtain the final evaluation score based on the dependency structure determined by different composition types. ComplexBench identifies significant deficiencies in existing LLMs when dealing with complex instructions with multiple constraints composition.
Read more7/12/2024
💬
0
From Complex to Simple: Enhancing Multi-Constraint Complex Instruction Following Ability of Large Language Models
Qianyu He, Jie Zeng, Qianxi He, Jiaqing Liang, Yanghua Xiao
It is imperative for Large language models (LLMs) to follow instructions with elaborate requirements (i.e. Complex Instructions Following). Yet, it remains under-explored how to enhance the ability of LLMs to follow complex instructions with multiple constraints. To bridge the gap, we initially study what training data is effective in enhancing complex constraints following abilities. We found that training LLMs with instructions containing multiple constraints enhances their understanding of complex instructions, especially those with lower complexity levels. The improvement can even generalize to compositions of out-of-domain constraints. Additionally, we further propose methods addressing how to obtain and utilize the effective training data. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments to prove the effectiveness of our methods in terms of overall performance and training efficiency. We also demonstrate that our methods improve models' ability to follow instructions generally and generalize effectively across out-of-domain, in-domain, and adversarial settings, while maintaining general capabilities.
Read more6/19/2024
💬
0
FollowBench: A Multi-level Fine-grained Constraints Following Benchmark for Large Language Models
Yuxin Jiang, Yufei Wang, Xingshan Zeng, Wanjun Zhong, Liangyou Li, Fei Mi, Lifeng Shang, Xin Jiang, Qun Liu, Wei Wang
The ability to follow instructions is crucial for Large Language Models (LLMs) to handle various real-world applications. Existing benchmarks primarily focus on evaluating pure response quality, rather than assessing whether the response follows constraints stated in the instruction. To fill this research gap, in this paper, we propose FollowBench, a Multi-level Fine-grained Constraints Following Benchmark for LLMs. FollowBench comprehensively includes five different types (i.e., Content, Situation, Style, Format, and Example) of fine-grained constraints. To enable a precise constraint following estimation on diverse difficulties, we introduce a Multi-level mechanism that incrementally adds a single constraint to the initial instruction at each increased level. To assess whether LLMs' outputs have satisfied every individual constraint, we propose to prompt strong LLMs with constraint-evolution paths to handle challenging open-ended instructions. By evaluating 13 closed-source and open-source popular LLMs on FollowBench, we highlight the weaknesses of LLMs in instruction following and point towards potential avenues for future work. The data and code are publicly available at https://github.com/YJiangcm/FollowBench.
Read more6/6/2024
0
CFBench: A Comprehensive Constraints-Following Benchmark for LLMs
Tao Zhang, Yanjun Shen, Wenjing Luo, Yan Zhang, Hao Liang, Tao Zhang, Fan Yang, Mingan Lin, Yujing Qiao, Weipeng Chen, Bin Cui, Wentao Zhang, Zenan Zhou
The adeptness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in comprehending and following natural language instructions is critical for their deployment in sophisticated real-world applications. Existing evaluations mainly focus on fragmented constraints or narrow scenarios, but they overlook the comprehensiveness and authenticity of constraints from the user's perspective. To bridge this gap, we propose CFBench, a large-scale Comprehensive Constraints Following Benchmark for LLMs, featuring 1,000 curated samples that cover more than 200 real-life scenarios and over 50 NLP tasks. CFBench meticulously compiles constraints from real-world instructions and constructs an innovative systematic framework for constraint types, which includes 10 primary categories and over 25 subcategories, and ensures each constraint is seamlessly integrated within the instructions. To make certain that the evaluation of LLM outputs aligns with user perceptions, we propose an advanced methodology that integrates multi-dimensional assessment criteria with requirement prioritization, covering various perspectives of constraints, instructions, and requirement fulfillment. Evaluating current leading LLMs on CFBench reveals substantial room for improvement in constraints following, and we further investigate influencing factors and enhancement strategies. The data and code are publicly available at https://github.com/PKU-Baichuan-MLSystemLab/CFBench
Read more8/6/2024