Benign, Tempered, or Catastrophic: A Taxonomy of Overfitting

Overview

• Recent advancements in overparameterized neural networks have motivated the study of interpolating methods that can perfectly fit noisy training data without catastrophically bad test performance.
• Benign overfitting, where some interpolating methods approach Bayes optimality even with noisy data, has been a focus of recent research to explain this phenomenon.
• However, this paper argues that many real-world interpolating methods, including neural networks, do not exhibit benign overfitting. Instead, they fall into an "intermediate regime" called tempered overfitting.

Plain English Explanation

Overparameterized neural networks, which have far more parameters than needed to fit the training data, have been surprisingly successful in practice. This has led researchers to study a class of methods called "interpolating methods" that can perfectly fit the training data, even if it's noisy.

Surprisingly, some interpolating methods don't perform terribly on new, unseen data, even with noisy training data. This phenomenon, called "benign overfitting," has been the focus of recent research to understand why these methods can work so well.

However, this paper argues that many real-world interpolating methods, including neural networks, don't actually exhibit benign overfitting. Instead, they fall into an in-between category called "tempered overfitting." In this case, modest noise in the training data leads to a small, but non-zero, decrease in performance on new data. They're not catastrophically bad, but also not as good as the benign overfitting case.

The researchers explore this tempered overfitting concept in depth, first in the context of a simpler machine learning model called kernel regression, and then for deep neural networks. They find that neural networks trained to perfectly fit the training data exhibit this tempered overfitting behavior, while those stopped early are more in the benign overfitting regime.

The goal is to work towards a more refined understanding of overfitting in modern machine learning models, which could help improve their performance and robustness.

Technical Explanation

The paper first explores the phenomenon of tempered overfitting in the context of kernel (ridge) regression (KR). The authors derive conditions on the ridge parameter and kernel eigenspectrum under which KR exhibits benign overfitting, catastrophic overfitting, or the intermediate tempered overfitting regime. They find that kernels with power-law spectra, including Laplace kernels and ReLU neural tangent kernels, exhibit tempered overfitting.

The paper then empirically studies deep neural networks through the lens of this taxonomy. They find that neural networks trained to interpolation (i.e., perfectly fit the training data) are in the tempered overfitting regime, while those stopped early are in the benign overfitting regime. This suggests that the common practice of early stopping may be a key factor in enabling benign overfitting in neural networks.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a nuanced and insightful perspective on the phenomenon of overfitting in modern machine learning models. By introducing the concept of "tempered overfitting," the authors highlight that the common dichotomy of "benign" vs. "catastrophic" overfitting may be an oversimplification.

One limitation of the work is that it focuses primarily on kernel regression and deep neural networks, leaving open the question of whether the tempered overfitting behavior generalizes to other types of interpolating models. Additionally, the paper does not extensively explore the practical implications or potential solutions for dealing with tempered overfitting in real-world applications.

Further research could investigate the underlying mechanisms driving tempered overfitting, as well as develop strategies for mitigating its effects. Exploring the connections between model architecture, optimization, and the different overfitting regimes could also yield valuable insights.

Conclusion

This paper makes an important contribution to the understanding of overfitting in modern machine learning by introducing the concept of "tempered overfitting." Rather than the binary view of benign vs. catastrophic overfitting, the authors demonstrate that many real-world interpolating methods, including neural networks, exhibit an intermediate regime where modest noise in the training data leads to a small but non-zero decrease in test performance.

By shedding light on this nuanced phenomenon, the paper lays the groundwork for a more refined understanding of overfitting, which could lead to the development of more robust and reliable machine learning models. As the field continues to grapple with the practical success of overparameterized networks, this work represents a valuable step towards a comprehensive theory of generalization in modern machine learning.