Minimum-Norm Interpolation Under Covariate Shift
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This paper explores the problem of minimum-norm interpolation under covariate shift, where the test data distribution differs from the training data distribution.
• The authors analyze the generalization properties of minimum-norm interpolators and how they relate to transfer learning and invariance.
• They provide a taxonomy of different types of overfitting, including benign, tempered, and catastrophic overfitting, and discuss the implications for real-world applications.
Plain English Explanation
When training a machine learning model, we often want it to perform well not just on the data it was trained on, but also on new, unseen data. This is the challenge of generalization. One common approach is to use a minimum-norm interpolator, which tries to find the simplest possible function that fits the training data perfectly.
However, the authors of this paper point out that this approach can run into problems when the distribution of the test data is different from the training data - a scenario known as covariate shift. In this case, the minimum-norm interpolator may actually perform worse on the test data, a phenomenon known as overfitting.
The paper provides a nuanced taxonomy of different types of overfitting, from benign (where the model still performs reasonably well) to catastrophic (where the model completely fails). This has important implications for real-world applications, where covariate shift is often a concern.
The authors also explore the connections between minimum-norm interpolation, transfer learning, and invariance - the ability of a model to perform well regardless of changes in the input distribution. This provides valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of different approaches to generalization.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a theoretical analysis of minimum-norm interpolation under covariate shift. The authors show that while minimum-norm interpolators can achieve perfect interpolation on the training data, they may suffer from poor generalization to the test distribution.
They introduce a taxonomy of different types of overfitting, ranging from benign (where the model still performs reasonably well) to catastrophic (where the model completely fails). This highlights the nuanced relationship between interpolation, transfer learning, and invariance.
The authors provide theoretical and empirical results demonstrating the limitations of minimum-norm interpolation under covariate shift, and discuss the implications for real-world applications where such distributional shifts are common.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thorough analysis of the generalization properties of minimum-norm interpolators, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for future research:
-
The theoretical analysis relies on several simplifying assumptions, such as linear models and Gaussian distributions. It would be valuable to explore the extent to which the findings generalize to more complex, nonlinear models and real-world data distributions.
-
The paper focuses on the tradeoffs between interpolation, transfer learning, and invariance, but does not provide a comprehensive solution to the problem of covariate shift. Exploring more robust techniques for tackling this challenge would be a fruitful area for further research.
-
While the taxonomy of overfitting is a valuable contribution, the boundaries between the different categories (benign, tempered, and catastrophic) may not always be clear-cut in practice. Developing more nuanced ways to characterize and diagnose these issues would be helpful for real-world applications.
Overall, this paper offers important insights into the limitations of minimum-norm interpolation and the challenges of generalization under covariate shift. The findings have significant implications for the development of more robust and reliable machine learning systems.
Conclusion
This paper provides a thoughtful analysis of the generalization properties of minimum-norm interpolators under covariate shift. By introducing a taxonomy of different types of overfitting, the authors shed light on the nuanced relationship between interpolation, transfer learning, and invariance.
The findings have important implications for real-world applications of machine learning, where covariate shift is a common challenge. The insights provided in this paper can inform the development of more robust and reliable models that can better generalize to unseen data distributions.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Minimum-Norm Interpolation Under Covariate Shift
Neil Mallinar, Austin Zane, Spencer Frei, Bin Yu
Transfer learning is a critical part of real-world machine learning deployments and has been extensively studied in experimental works with overparameterized neural networks. However, even in the simplest setting of linear regression a notable gap still exists in the theoretical understanding of transfer learning. In-distribution research on high-dimensional linear regression has led to the identification of a phenomenon known as textit{benign overfitting}, in which linear interpolators overfit to noisy training labels and yet still generalize well. This behavior occurs under specific conditions on the source covariance matrix and input data dimension. Therefore, it is natural to wonder how such high-dimensional linear models behave under transfer learning. We prove the first non-asymptotic excess risk bounds for benignly-overfit linear interpolators in the transfer learning setting. From our analysis, we propose a taxonomy of textit{beneficial} and textit{malignant} covariate shifts based on the degree of overparameterization. We follow our analysis with empirical studies that show these beneficial and malignant covariate shifts for linear interpolators on real image data, and for fully-connected neural networks in settings where the input data dimension is larger than the training sample size.
Read more7/18/2024
🚀
0
Malign Overfitting: Interpolation Can Provably Preclude Invariance
Yoav Wald, Gal Yona, Uri Shalit, Yair Carmon
Learned classifiers should often possess certain invariance properties meant to encourage fairness, robustness, or out-of-distribution generalization. However, multiple recent works empirically demonstrate that common invariance-inducing regularizers are ineffective in the over-parameterized regime, in which classifiers perfectly fit (i.e. interpolate) the training data. This suggests that the phenomenon of benign overfitting, in which models generalize well despite interpolating, might not favorably extend to settings in which robustness or fairness are desirable. In this work we provide a theoretical justification for these observations. We prove that -- even in the simplest of settings -- any interpolating learning rule (with arbitrarily small margin) will not satisfy these invariance properties. We then propose and analyze an algorithm that -- in the same setting -- successfully learns a non-interpolating classifier that is provably invariant. We validate our theoretical observations on simulated data and the Waterbirds dataset.
Read more7/4/2024
0
Generalization error of min-norm interpolators in transfer learning
Yanke Song, Sohom Bhattacharya, Pragya Sur
This paper establishes the generalization error of pooled min-$ell_2$-norm interpolation in transfer learning where data from diverse distributions are available. Min-norm interpolators emerge naturally as implicit regularized limits of modern machine learning algorithms. Previous work characterized their out-of-distribution risk when samples from the test distribution are unavailable during training. However, in many applications, a limited amount of test data may be available during training, yet properties of min-norm interpolation in this setting are not well-understood. We address this gap by characterizing the bias and variance of pooled min-$ell_2$-norm interpolation under covariate and model shifts. The pooled interpolator captures both early fusion and a form of intermediate fusion. Our results have several implications: under model shift, for low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), adding data always hurts. For higher SNR, transfer learning helps as long as the shift-to-signal (SSR) ratio lies below a threshold that we characterize explicitly. By consistently estimating these ratios, we provide a data-driven method to determine: (i) when the pooled interpolator outperforms the target-based interpolator, and (ii) the optimal number of target samples that minimizes the generalization error. Under covariate shift, if the source sample size is small relative to the dimension, heterogeneity between between domains improves the risk, and vice versa. We establish a novel anisotropic local law to achieve these characterizations, which may be of independent interest in random matrix theory. We supplement our theoretical characterizations with comprehensive simulations that demonstrate the finite-sample efficacy of our results.
Read more6/21/2024
🏷️
0
Harnessing the Power of Vicinity-Informed Analysis for Classification under Covariate Shift
Mitsuhiro Fujikawa, Yohei Akimoto, Jun Sakuma, Kazuto Fukuchi
Transfer learning enhances prediction accuracy on a target distribution by leveraging data from a source distribution, demonstrating significant benefits in various applications. This paper introduces a novel dissimilarity measure that utilizes vicinity information, i.e., the local structure of data points, to analyze the excess error in classification under covariate shift, a transfer learning setting where marginal feature distributions differ but conditional label distributions remain the same. We characterize the excess error using the proposed measure and demonstrate faster or competitive convergence rates compared to previous techniques. Notably, our approach is effective in situations where the non-absolute continuousness assumption, which often appears in real-world applications, holds. Our theoretical analysis bridges the gap between current theoretical findings and empirical observations in transfer learning, particularly in scenarios with significant differences between source and target distributions.
Read more5/28/2024