Malign Overfitting: Interpolation Can Provably Preclude Invariance

Overview

• This paper investigates the effectiveness of common techniques used to make machine learning models fair, robust, or generalizable to new data.
• The authors find that these techniques often fail to work when models can perfectly fit (interpolate) the training data, a phenomenon known as "benign overfitting".
• They provide a theoretical justification for these observations and propose an alternative algorithm that can learn an invariant classifier without interpolating the training data.

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines a common challenge in machine learning: how to train models that are fair, robust, and generalize well to new, unseen data. Researchers often use techniques like regularization to encourage these desirable properties in learned classifiers.

However, the authors show that these techniques become ineffective when models can perfectly fit (or "interpolate") the training data. This phenomenon, called "benign overfitting", means models can generalize well despite memorizing the training set. The authors explain that in this over-parameterized regime, the models no longer satisfy the desired invariance properties.

To address this, the authors propose a new algorithm that can learn a classifier that is provably invariant, without perfectly interpolating the training data. They validate their approach on simulated data and a real-world dataset.

Technical Explanation

The paper starts by noting that many machine learning techniques are designed to encourage desirable invariance properties in learned classifiers, such as fairness, robustness, or out-of-distribution generalization. However, recent work has shown these techniques often fail when models can perfectly fit (interpolate) the training data.

To understand this, the authors prove a theoretical result: in the simplest settings, any interpolating learning rule (with arbitrarily small margin) will not satisfy the desired invariance properties. They then propose and analyze a new algorithm that, in the same setting, successfully learns a non-interpolating classifier that is provably invariant.

Specifically, the authors show that their algorithm can learn a linear classifier that is invariant to certain transformations of the input data, without perfectly fitting the training examples. They validate their approach on simulated data as well as the Waterbirds dataset, demonstrating its ability to learn fair and robust classifiers.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable theoretical contribution by explaining why common invariance-inducing techniques fail in the over-parameterized regime of benign overfitting. This is an important insight, as many real-world machine learning models operate in this regime.

However, the authors acknowledge that their theoretical analysis is limited to the simplest linear setting. It remains an open question whether their findings extend to more complex, nonlinear models. Additionally, the proposed algorithm, while effective on the tested datasets, may not scale well to larger, high-dimensional problems.

Further research is needed to develop practical techniques that can reliably learn invariant classifiers, even when models can perfectly fit the training data. The authors suggest exploring alternative approaches, such as incorporating prior knowledge about the data-generating process, as a promising direction for future work.

Conclusion

This paper highlights a fundamental challenge in machine learning: how to train models that are fair, robust, and generalize well, even when models can perfectly fit the training data. The authors provide a theoretical justification for why common techniques often fail in this "benign overfitting" regime and propose a new algorithm that can learn an invariant classifier without interpolating the training examples.

While the specific theoretical results are limited to simple linear settings, the broader insights from this work are valuable for the field of machine learning. Addressing the tension between model flexibility and desired invariance properties remains an active area of research, with important implications for the real-world deployment of AI systems.