A Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithm for Constrained MDPs with Long-Term Constraints

Read original: arXiv:2304.14326 - Published 8/30/2024 by Jacopo Germano, Francesco Emanuele Stradi, Gianmarco Genalti, Matteo Castiglioni, Alberto Marchesi, Nicola Gatti
Total Score

0

🔍

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores online learning in episodic constrained Markov decision processes (CMDPs)
  • The learner aims to collect as much reward as possible while satisfying long-term constraints
  • Rewards and constraints can be selected stochastically or adversarially, and the transition function is unknown to the learner
  • Online learning in classical (unconstrained) MDPs has been well-studied, but CMDPs are still largely unexplored

Plain English Explanation

In this paper, the researchers are looking at a type of problem where a learner, like a robot or software agent, needs to make decisions to earn the most "reward" (like points or money) while also following certain "constraints" (rules or limits). The catch is that the learner doesn't know everything about how the system works, and the rewards and constraints can be picked either randomly or by an adversary trying to make things difficult.

This type of problem is common in real-world applications like autonomous driving, automated bidding, and recommender systems, where the agent has to balance earning rewards while following rules and requirements.

The researchers propose a new algorithm that can handle both stochastic and adversarial rewards and constraints, without needing to know the details of how the system works. Their algorithm matches the best performance for the case where constraints are chosen randomly, and is the first to provide guarantees when the constraints are chosen by an adversary trying to make things difficult.

Technical Explanation

The paper studies online learning in episodic constrained Markov decision processes (CMDPs). In a CMDP, the learner aims to collect as much reward as possible over a series of episodes, while satisfying some long-term constraints during the learning process.

The rewards and constraints can be selected either stochastically or adversarially, and the transition function (how the system changes from one state to the next) is not known to the learner.

The researchers present a new "best-of-both-worlds" algorithm that can handle both stochastic and adversarial rewards and constraints, without requiring any knowledge of the underlying process. Their algorithm matches the state-of-the-art regret (difference from optimal performance) and constraint violation bounds for the stochastic case, and is the first to provide guarantees for the adversarial case.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes an important contribution by addressing the understudied problem of online learning in CMDPs, which is relevant for many real-world applications. The proposed algorithm is a significant step forward, as it is the first to provide rigorous performance guarantees in the adversarial setting.

However, the paper does not discuss potential limitations or areas for further research in depth. For example, the algorithm may have high computational complexity, which could limit its practical applicability. Additionally, the paper does not consider more complex scenarios, such as partial observability or non-stationary environments, which are common in real-world applications.

Further research could explore ways to improve the computational efficiency of the algorithm, as well as extend the framework to handle more realistic assumptions and settings. Validating the algorithm's performance on realistic benchmarks would also be an important next step.

Conclusion

This paper presents a new algorithm for online learning in episodic CMDPs, which can handle both stochastic and adversarial rewards and constraints without requiring knowledge of the underlying system. The algorithm matches state-of-the-art performance in the stochastic case and is the first to provide guarantees in the adversarial setting.

The research addresses an important problem that is highly relevant for real-world applications, such as autonomous driving, automated bidding, and recommender systems. While the paper makes a valuable contribution, further research is needed to explore the algorithm's practical limitations and extend the framework to more complex scenarios.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔍

Total Score

0

A Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithm for Constrained MDPs with Long-Term Constraints

Jacopo Germano, Francesco Emanuele Stradi, Gianmarco Genalti, Matteo Castiglioni, Alberto Marchesi, Nicola Gatti

We study online learning in episodic constrained Markov decision processes (CMDPs), where the learner aims at collecting as much reward as possible over the episodes, while satisfying some long-term constraints during the learning process. Rewards and constraints can be selected either stochastically or adversarially, and the transition function is not known to the learner. While online learning in classical (unconstrained) MDPs has received considerable attention over the last years, the setting of CMDPs is still largely unexplored. This is surprising, since in real-world applications, such as, e.g., autonomous driving, automated bidding, and recommender systems, there are usually additional constraints and specifications that an agent has to obey during the learning process. In this paper, we provide the first best-of-both-worlds algorithm for CMDPs with long-term constraints, in the flavor of Balseiro et al. (2023). Our algorithm is capable of handling settings in which rewards and constraints are selected either stochastically or adversarially, without requiring any knowledge of the underling process. Moreover, our algorithm matches state-of-the-art regret and constraint violation bounds for settings in which constraints are selected stochastically, while it is the first to provide guarantees in the case in which they are chosen adversarially.

Read more

8/30/2024

🏷️

Total Score

0

Beyond Primal-Dual Methods in Bandits with Stochastic and Adversarial Constraints

Martino Bernasconi, Matteo Castiglioni, Andrea Celli, Federico Fusco

We address a generalization of the bandit with knapsacks problem, where a learner aims to maximize rewards while satisfying an arbitrary set of long-term constraints. Our goal is to design best-of-both-worlds algorithms that perform optimally under both stochastic and adversarial constraints. Previous works address this problem via primal-dual methods, and require some stringent assumptions, namely the Slater's condition, and in adversarial settings, they either assume knowledge of a lower bound on the Slater's parameter, or impose strong requirements on the primal and dual regret minimizers such as requiring weak adaptivity. We propose an alternative and more natural approach based on optimistic estimations of the constraints. Surprisingly, we show that estimating the constraints with an UCB-like approach guarantees optimal performances. Our algorithm consists of two main components: (i) a regret minimizer working on emph{moving strategy sets} and (ii) an estimate of the feasible set as an optimistic weighted empirical mean of previous samples. The key challenge in this approach is designing adaptive weights that meet the different requirements for stochastic and adversarial constraints. Our algorithm is significantly simpler than previous approaches, and has a cleaner analysis. Moreover, ours is the first best-of-both-worlds algorithm providing bounds logarithmic in the number of constraints. Additionally, in stochastic settings, it provides $widetilde O(sqrt{T})$ regret emph{without} Slater's condition.

Read more

5/28/2024

Truly No-Regret Learning in Constrained MDPs
Total Score

0

Truly No-Regret Learning in Constrained MDPs

Adrian Muller, Pragnya Alatur, Volkan Cevher, Giorgia Ramponi, Niao He

Constrained Markov decision processes (CMDPs) are a common way to model safety constraints in reinforcement learning. State-of-the-art methods for efficiently solving CMDPs are based on primal-dual algorithms. For these algorithms, all currently known regret bounds allow for error cancellations -- one can compensate for a constraint violation in one round with a strict constraint satisfaction in another. This makes the online learning process unsafe since it only guarantees safety for the final (mixture) policy but not during learning. As Efroni et al. (2020) pointed out, it is an open question whether primal-dual algorithms can provably achieve sublinear regret if we do not allow error cancellations. In this paper, we give the first affirmative answer. We first generalize a result on last-iterate convergence of regularized primal-dual schemes to CMDPs with multiple constraints. Building upon this insight, we propose a model-based primal-dual algorithm to learn in an unknown CMDP. We prove that our algorithm achieves sublinear regret without error cancellations.

Read more

7/22/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Anytime-Constrained Reinforcement Learning

Jeremy McMahan, Xiaojin Zhu

We introduce and study constrained Markov Decision Processes (cMDPs) with anytime constraints. An anytime constraint requires the agent to never violate its budget at any point in time, almost surely. Although Markovian policies are no longer sufficient, we show that there exist optimal deterministic policies augmented with cumulative costs. In fact, we present a fixed-parameter tractable reduction from anytime-constrained cMDPs to unconstrained MDPs. Our reduction yields planning and learning algorithms that are time and sample-efficient for tabular cMDPs so long as the precision of the costs is logarithmic in the size of the cMDP. However, we also show that computing non-trivial approximately optimal policies is NP-hard in general. To circumvent this bottleneck, we design provable approximation algorithms that efficiently compute or learn an arbitrarily accurate approximately feasible policy with optimal value so long as the maximum supported cost is bounded by a polynomial in the cMDP or the absolute budget. Given our hardness results, our approximation guarantees are the best possible under worst-case analysis.

Read more

6/14/2024