Beyond Perplexity: Multi-dimensional Safety Evaluation of LLM Compression
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This paper examines the safety and performance of compressing large language models (LLMs) using various techniques, going beyond just measuring perplexity.
• The researchers evaluate the compressed models across multiple dimensions, including [decoding-compressed-trust-scrutinizing-trustworthiness-efficient-llms], [comprehensive-evaluation-quantization-strategies-large-language-models], [ranking-llms-by-compression], and [from-representational-harms-to-quality-service-harms].
• The goal is to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the tradeoffs and implications of compressing LLMs, which is important as these models become more widely deployed.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text, but they often require a lot of computing power and storage. Compressing these models can make them more efficient and accessible, but it's important to understand the potential impacts on safety and performance.
This paper looks at different ways to compress LLMs and evaluates the compressed models across several key areas, including:
- [decoding-compressed-trust-scrutinizing-trustworthiness-efficient-llms]: How well the compressed models can be trusted to provide accurate and reliable information.
- [comprehensive-evaluation-quantization-strategies-large-language-models]: The effectiveness of various techniques for compressing the models, like quantization.
- [ranking-llms-by-compression]: Comparing the performance of different compressed models to see which ones work best.
- [from-representational-harms-to-quality-service-harms]: Potential harms that could arise from using the compressed models, such as biases or reduced quality of service.
The goal is to give a more complete picture of the tradeoffs involved in compressing LLMs, so developers and users can make informed decisions about when and how to use these compressed models.
Technical Explanation
The researchers first provide background on large language models (LLMs) and the need for compression techniques to make them more efficient. They then describe their multi-dimensional evaluation framework, which assesses compressed LLMs across several key areas:
[decoding-compressed-trust-scrutinizing-trustworthiness-efficient-llms]: The team evaluates how well the compressed models can be trusted to provide accurate and reliable information, using techniques like probing and human evaluation.
[comprehensive-evaluation-quantization-strategies-large-language-models]: They comprehensively assess different compression techniques, such as quantization, looking at factors like model performance, efficiency, and quality of service.
[ranking-llms-by-compression]: The researchers rank the compressed LLMs based on their overall performance, helping identify the most effective compression strategies.
[from-representational-harms-to-quality-service-harms]: Finally, the paper examines potential harms that could arise from using the compressed models, including representational biases and reduced quality of service.
Through this multi-dimensional approach, the researchers aim to provide a more holistic understanding of the tradeoffs involved in compressing LLMs, which is crucial as these models become more widely deployed in real-world applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thorough and thoughtful evaluation of compressed LLMs, addressing important considerations beyond just model performance metrics like perplexity. By examining trustworthiness, potential harms, and other key dimensions, the researchers provide a more comprehensive understanding of the implications of model compression.
However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations in its approach. For example, the human evaluations of model trustworthiness may be subject to biases, and the assessment of potential harms is not exhaustive. Additionally, the researchers note that their findings may be specific to the particular LLMs and compression techniques they studied, and further research is needed to validate the generalizability of the results.
[comprehensive-evaluation-quantization-strategies-large-language-models] In particular, the in-depth analysis of different quantization strategies is a strength of the paper, as this is an important compression technique that deserves careful scrutiny.
Overall, this research represents an important step towards developing a more holistic framework for evaluating the safety and performance of compressed LLMs. By highlighting the need to look beyond just perplexity, the paper encourages the AI community to think critically about the multifaceted implications of model compression.
Conclusion
This paper takes a comprehensive, multi-dimensional approach to evaluating the safety and performance of compressed large language models (LLMs). By assessing factors like trustworthiness, potential harms, and ranking of compression techniques, the researchers provide a more complete understanding of the tradeoffs involved in compressing these powerful AI systems.
As LLMs become more widely deployed, this type of rigorous, holistic evaluation will be crucial to ensure the safe and responsible development of compressed models. The insights from this paper can help guide future research and inform the decisions of developers and users as they navigate the complex landscape of model compression.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Beyond Perplexity: Multi-dimensional Safety Evaluation of LLM Compression
Zhichao Xu, Ashim Gupta, Tao Li, Oliver Bentham, Vivek Srikumar
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world scenarios with the help of recent model compression techniques. Such momentum towards local deployment means the use of compressed LLMs will widely impact a large population. However, prior analysis works often prioritize on preserving perplexity which is a direct analogy to training loss. The impact of compression method on other critical aspects of model behavior, particularly safety, still calls for a systematic assessment. To this end, we investigate the impact of model compression on four dimensions: (1) degeneration harm, i.e., bias and toxicity in generation; (2) representational harm, i.e., biases in discriminative tasks; (3) dialect bias; (4) language modeling and downstream task performance. We cover a wide spectrum of LLM compression techniques, including unstructured pruning, semi-structured pruning and quantization. Our analysis reveals that compression can lead to unexpected consequences. Although compression may unintentionally remedy LLMs' degeneration harm, it can still exacerbate on the representational harm axis. Although compression may unintentionally remedy LLMs' degeneration harm, it can still exacerbate on the representational harm axis. Moreover, there is a divergent impact on different protected groups as the compression rate grows. Finally, different compression methods have drastically different safety impacts, e.g., quantization mostly preserves bias while pruning degrades quickly. Our findings underscore the importance of integrating safety assessments into the development of compressed LLMs to ensure their reliability across real-world applications. Our full results are available here: url{https://github.com/zhichaoxu-shufe/Beyond-Perplexity-Compression-Safety-Eval}
Read more7/12/2024
1
Decoding Compressed Trust: Scrutinizing the Trustworthiness of Efficient LLMs Under Compression
Junyuan Hong, Jinhao Duan, Chenhui Zhang, Zhangheng Li, Chulin Xie, Kelsey Lieberman, James Diffenderfer, Brian Bartoldson, Ajay Jaiswal, Kaidi Xu, Bhavya Kailkhura, Dan Hendrycks, Dawn Song, Zhangyang Wang, Bo Li
Compressing high-capability Large Language Models (LLMs) has emerged as a favored strategy for resource-efficient inferences. While state-of-the-art (SoTA) compression methods boast impressive advancements in preserving benign task performance, the potential risks of compression in terms of safety and trustworthiness have been largely neglected. This study conducts the first, thorough evaluation of three (3) leading LLMs using five (5) SoTA compression techniques across eight (8) trustworthiness dimensions. Our experiments highlight the intricate interplay between compression and trustworthiness, revealing some interesting patterns. We find that quantization is currently a more effective approach than pruning in achieving efficiency and trustworthiness simultaneously. For instance, a 4-bit quantized model retains the trustworthiness of its original counterpart, but model pruning significantly degrades trustworthiness, even at 50% sparsity. Moreover, employing quantization within a moderate bit range could unexpectedly improve certain trustworthiness dimensions such as ethics and fairness. Conversely, extreme quantization to very low bit levels (3 bits) tends to reduce trustworthiness significantly. This increased risk cannot be uncovered by looking at benign performance alone, in turn, mandating comprehensive trustworthiness evaluation in practice. These findings culminate in practical recommendations for simultaneously achieving high utility, efficiency, and trustworthiness in LLMs. Code and models are available at https://decoding-comp-trust.github.io.
Read more6/5/2024
📈
0
A Survey on Model Compression for Large Language Models
Xunyu Zhu, Jian Li, Yong Liu, Can Ma, Weiping Wang
Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed natural language processing tasks successfully. Yet, their large size and high computational needs pose challenges for practical use, especially in resource-limited settings. Model compression has emerged as a key research area to address these challenges. This paper presents a survey of model compression techniques for LLMs. We cover methods like quantization, pruning, and knowledge distillation, highlighting recent advancements. We also discuss benchmarking strategies and evaluation metrics crucial for assessing compressed LLMs. This survey offers valuable insights for researchers and practitioners, aiming to enhance efficiency and real-world applicability of LLMs while laying a foundation for future advancements.
Read more7/31/2024
0
A Comprehensive Evaluation of Quantization Strategies for Large Language Models
Renren Jin, Jiangcun Du, Wuwei Huang, Wei Liu, Jian Luan, Bin Wang, Deyi Xiong
Increasing the number of parameters in large language models (LLMs) usually improves performance in downstream tasks but raises compute and memory costs, making deployment difficult in resource-limited settings. Quantization techniques, which reduce the bits needed for model weights or activations with minimal performance loss, have become popular due to the rise of LLMs. However, most quantization studies use pre-trained LLMs, and the impact of quantization on instruction-tuned LLMs and the relationship between perplexity and benchmark performance of quantized LLMs are not well understood. Evaluation of quantized LLMs is often limited to language modeling and a few classification tasks, leaving their performance on other benchmarks unclear. To address these gaps, we propose a structured evaluation framework consisting of three critical dimensions: (1) knowledge & capacity, (2) alignment, and (3) efficiency, and conduct extensive experiments across ten diverse benchmarks. Our experimental results indicate that LLMs with 4-bit quantization can retain performance comparable to their non-quantized counterparts, and perplexity can serve as a proxy metric for quantized LLMs on most benchmarks. Furthermore, quantized LLMs with larger parameter scales can outperform smaller LLMs. Despite the memory savings achieved through quantization, it can also slow down the inference speed of LLMs. Consequently, substantial engineering efforts and hardware support are imperative to achieve a balanced optimization of decoding speed and memory consumption in the context of quantized LLMs.
Read more6/7/2024