Decoding Compressed Trust: Scrutinizing the Trustworthiness of Efficient LLMs Under Compression
2403.15447
2
0
Abstract
Compressing high-capability Large Language Models (LLMs) has emerged as a favored strategy for resource-efficient inferences. While state-of-the-art (SoTA) compression methods boast impressive advancements in preserving benign task performance, the potential risks of compression in terms of safety and trustworthiness have been largely neglected. This study conducts the first, thorough evaluation of three (3) leading LLMs using five (5) SoTA compression techniques across eight (8) trustworthiness dimensions. Our experiments highlight the intricate interplay between compression and trustworthiness, revealing some interesting patterns. We find that quantization is currently a more effective approach than pruning in achieving efficiency and trustworthiness simultaneously. For instance, a 4-bit quantized model retains the trustworthiness of its original counterpart, but model pruning significantly degrades trustworthiness, even at 50% sparsity. Moreover, employing quantization within a moderate bit range could unexpectedly improve certain trustworthiness dimensions such as ethics and fairness. Conversely, extreme quantization to very low bit levels (3 bits) tends to reduce trustworthiness significantly. This increased risk cannot be uncovered by looking at benign performance alone, in turn, mandating comprehensive trustworthiness evaluation in practice. These findings culminate in practical recommendations for simultaneously achieving high utility, efficiency, and trustworthiness in LLMs. Code and models are available at https://decoding-comp-trust.github.io.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Examines the trustworthiness of efficient large language models (LLMs) under compression
- Investigates how model compression techniques like quantization can impact the reliability and confidence of LLM predictions
- Proposes a framework for rigorously evaluating the trustworthiness of compressed LLMs
Plain English Explanation
This paper explores the reliability of highly compressed large language models (LLMs) - models that have been made smaller and more efficient through techniques like quantization. The researchers were interested in understanding how these compression methods might impact the trustworthiness and confidence of the model's outputs.
Compressing LLMs can make them more practical for deployment on resource-constrained devices, but it could also introduce errors or reduce the model's overall reliability. The researchers developed a framework to systematically evaluate the trustworthiness of compressed LLMs, looking at factors like prediction confidence, calibration, and robustness.
By applying this framework, the researchers were able to uncover important insights about how different compression techniques affect an LLM's trustworthiness. For example, they found that while quantization can significantly reduce model size, it can also lead to miscalibrated confidence scores and increased sensitivity to certain types of inputs.
These findings have important implications for the real-world deployment of efficient LLMs, as developers need to carefully consider the trustworthiness trade-offs introduced by compression. The framework proposed in this paper provides a rigorous way to assess these trade-offs and ensure that compressed models meet the necessary standards for reliability and safety.
Technical Explanation
The paper first reviews related work on model compression techniques and their impact on LLM performance and reliability. It then introduces a framework for comprehensively evaluating the trustworthiness of compressed LLMs across several key dimensions:
- Prediction Confidence: Examining how compression affects the calibration of the model's confidence scores, ensuring they accurately reflect the true likelihood of correct predictions.
- Robustness: Assessing the model's sensitivity to perturbations in the input, which could indicate a lack of reliability under real-world conditions.
- Factual Consistency: Verifying that the model's outputs remain grounded in factual knowledge, rather than exhibiting overconfidence or miscalibration.
The researchers apply this framework to several popular LLMs, comparing the trustworthiness of the original models to their compressed counterparts. Their results show that while compression can significantly reduce model size, it can also introduce concerning issues, such as overconfident predictions and increased sensitivity to input perturbations.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and rigorous approach to evaluating the trustworthiness of compressed LLMs, addressing an important gap in the literature. However, the authors acknowledge that their framework may not capture all aspects of trustworthiness, and further research is needed to develop more holistic evaluation methods.
Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on quantization as a compression technique, but other approaches, such as knowledge distillation, may have different effects on trustworthiness. Expanding the evaluation to a broader range of compression methods could yield additional insights.
Finally, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying reasons why certain compression techniques may degrade trustworthiness. Further investigations into the specific mechanisms at play could help inform the development of more trustworthy compression strategies.
Conclusion
This paper presents a crucial step towards ensuring the reliable deployment of efficient large language models. By developing a framework to rigorously assess the trustworthiness of compressed LLMs, the researchers have provided a valuable tool for developers and researchers working to bridge the gap between model performance and real-world reliability.
The insights gained from applying this framework highlight the importance of carefully considering the trustworthiness trade-offs introduced by model compression. As the demand for efficient AI systems continues to grow, this work serves as a important reminder that model optimization must be balanced with maintaining the necessary standards of reliability and safety.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
On the Compressibility of Quantized Large Language Models
Yu Mao, Weilan Wang, Hongchao Du, Nan Guan, Chun Jason Xue
0
0
Deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) on edge or mobile devices offers significant benefits, such as enhanced data privacy and real-time processing capabilities. However, it also faces critical challenges due to the substantial memory requirement of LLMs. Quantization is an effective way of reducing the model size while maintaining good performance. However, even after quantization, LLMs may still be too big to fit entirely into the limited memory of edge or mobile devices and have to be partially loaded from the storage to complete the inference. In this case, the I/O latency of model loading becomes the bottleneck of the LLM inference latency. In this work, we take a preliminary step of studying applying data compression techniques to reduce data movement and thus speed up the inference of quantized LLM on memory-constrained devices. In particular, we discussed the compressibility of quantized LLMs, the trade-off between the compressibility and performance of quantized LLMs, and opportunities to optimize both of them jointly.
5/7/2024
💬
CompactifAI: Extreme Compression of Large Language Models using Quantum-Inspired Tensor Networks
Andrei Tomut, Saeed S. Jahromi, Abhijoy Sarkar, Uygar Kurt, Sukhbinder Singh, Faysal Ishtiaq, Cesar Mu~noz, Prabdeep Singh Bajaj, Ali Elborady, Gianni del Bimbo, Mehrazin Alizadeh, David Montero, Pablo Martin-Ramiro, Muhammad Ibrahim, Oussama Tahiri Alaoui, John Malcolm, Samuel Mugel, Roman Orus
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and LlaMA are advancing rapidly in generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), but their immense size poses significant challenges, such as huge training and inference costs, substantial energy demands, and limitations for on-site deployment. Traditional compression methods such as pruning, distillation, and low-rank approximation focus on reducing the effective number of neurons in the network, while quantization focuses on reducing the numerical precision of individual weights to reduce the model size while keeping the number of neurons fixed. While these compression methods have been relatively successful in practice, there is no compelling reason to believe that truncating the number of neurons is an optimal strategy. In this context, this paper introduces CompactifAI, an innovative LLM compression approach using quantum-inspired Tensor Networks that focuses on the model's correlation space instead, allowing for a more controlled, refined and interpretable model compression. Our method is versatile and can be implemented with - or on top of - other compression techniques. As a benchmark, we demonstrate that a combination of CompactifAI with quantization allows to reduce a 93% the memory size of LlaMA 7B, reducing also 70% the number of parameters, accelerating 50% the training and 25% the inference times of the model, and just with a small accuracy drop of 2% - 3%, going much beyond of what is achievable today by other compression techniques. Our methods also allow to perform a refined layer sensitivity profiling, showing that deeper layers tend to be more suitable for tensor network compression, which is compatible with recent observations on the ineffectiveness of those layers for LLM performance. Our results imply that standard LLMs are, in fact, heavily overparametrized, and do not need to be large at all.
5/14/2024
🏷️
Ranking LLMs by compression
Peijia Guo, Ziguang Li, Haibo Hu, Chao Huang, Ming Li, Rui Zhang
0
0
We conceptualize the process of understanding as information compression, and propose a method for ranking large language models (LLMs) based on lossless data compression. We demonstrate the equivalence of compression length under arithmetic coding with cumulative negative log probabilities when using a large language model as a prior, that is, the pre-training phase of the model is essentially the process of learning the optimal coding length. At the same time, the evaluation metric compression ratio can be obtained without actual compression, which greatly saves overhead. In this paper, we use five large language models as priors for compression, then compare their performance on challenging natural language processing tasks, including sentence completion, question answering, and coreference resolution. Experimental results show that compression ratio and model performance are positively correlated, so it can be used as a general metric to evaluate large language models.
6/21/2024
💬
Benchmarking Trustworthiness of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Study
Yichi Zhang, Yao Huang, Yitong Sun, Chang Liu, Zhe Zhao, Zhengwei Fang, Yifan Wang, Huanran Chen, Xiao Yang, Xingxing Wei, Hang Su, Yinpeng Dong, Jun Zhu
0
0
Despite the superior capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) across diverse tasks, they still face significant trustworthiness challenges. Yet, current literature on the assessment of trustworthy MLLMs remains limited, lacking a holistic evaluation to offer thorough insights into future improvements. In this work, we establish MultiTrust, the first comprehensive and unified benchmark on the trustworthiness of MLLMs across five primary aspects: truthfulness, safety, robustness, fairness, and privacy. Our benchmark employs a rigorous evaluation strategy that addresses both multimodal risks and cross-modal impacts, encompassing 32 diverse tasks with self-curated datasets. Extensive experiments with 21 modern MLLMs reveal some previously unexplored trustworthiness issues and risks, highlighting the complexities introduced by the multimodality and underscoring the necessity for advanced methodologies to enhance their reliability. For instance, typical proprietary models still struggle with the perception of visually confusing images and are vulnerable to multimodal jailbreaking and adversarial attacks; MLLMs are more inclined to disclose privacy in text and reveal ideological and cultural biases even when paired with irrelevant images in inference, indicating that the multimodality amplifies the internal risks from base LLMs. Additionally, we release a scalable toolbox for standardized trustworthiness research, aiming to facilitate future advancements in this important field. Code and resources are publicly available at: https://multi-trust.github.io/.
6/12/2024