Bringing active learning, experimentation, and student-created videos in engineering: A study about teaching electronics and physical computing integrating online and mobile learning

Overview

• This paper explores an Active Learning (AL) methodology to teach electronics, physical computing, programming, and basic robotics in online engineering education.
• The methodology was applied to 56 students across two engineering programs and included three main components: in-home laboratories, student-created videos/blogs, and teacher support.
• The study used a mixed-methods approach, collecting data through surveys, interviews, and student performance metrics.
• The results suggest the AL methodology positively impacted student motivation, self-efficacy, anxiety reduction, and academic performance.

Plain English Explanation

This research looked at a way to bring active learning techniques, like hands-on activities and experiments, into online engineering courses. Active learning is known to help students develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills, but most of the success with this approach has been in traditional, in-person classes.

The researchers created a new active learning methodology specifically for online engineering education. This approach had three main parts:

1. In-home labs: Students used low-cost hardware devices to do hands-on experiments and projects at home, rather than in a campus lab.
2. Student-created content: Students made videos and wrote blog posts to demonstrate their learning and skills.
3. Teacher support: Instructors provided guidance and feedback to students throughout the process.

Over 50 students in two different engineering programs tried out this new online active learning approach. The researchers collected data through surveys, interviews, and by looking at the students' grades.

The results were quite positive. Students reported feeling more motivated, confident, and less anxious about the course material. Their academic performance also improved. This suggests that active learning can be effectively implemented in online engineering education, not just in traditional classroom settings.

The researchers believe this methodology and their findings could be useful for others looking to incorporate more active, hands-on learning into their online or blended engineering courses.

Technical Explanation

The study used the Integrated Course Design Model (ICDM) to develop an Active Learning (AL) methodology for online engineering education. The methodology had three main components:

1. In-home laboratories: Students used low-cost hardware devices, such as microcontrollers and sensors, to perform hands-on physical computing (PhyC) activities and experiments at home, rather than in a campus laboratory.
2. Student-created videos and blogs: Students documented their learning process by creating tutorial videos and writing blog posts about their projects and experiences.
3. Teacher support and feedback: Instructors provided guidance, support, and feedback to students throughout the learning activities.

The study involved 56 students from two engineering programs: Technology in Electronics and Industrial Engineering. A mixed-methods approach was used to collect and analyze data, including:

• Surveys to assess student perceptions and attitudes
• Evaluation rubrics to assess student work
• Semi-structured interviews to gain deeper insights
• Student grades to measure academic performance

The results indicate that the AL methodology had a positive impact on student motivation, self-efficacy, anxiety reduction, and academic performance in the courses. Students reported enjoying the hands-on activities and felt that the combination of online, mobile, and hands-on learning components helped them better understand the course material.

Critical Analysis

The study provides a promising active learning framework for online engineering education, addressing a gap in the literature. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

1. Sample size and generalizability: The study involved a relatively small sample of 56 students from two engineering programs. Replicating the study with larger and more diverse student populations would help establish the generalizability of the findings.

2. Long-term impacts: The study focused on short-term outcomes, such as student perceptions and immediate academic performance. Investigating the long-term effects of the AL methodology on skills development, knowledge retention, and career outcomes would provide valuable insights.

3. Comparison to traditional methods: While the results are promising, the study did not directly compare the AL methodology to traditional online or in-person engineering education approaches. A comparative analysis would help quantify the relative benefits of the AL approach.

4. Fragility of active learners: The study did not address potential challenges or downsides of the AL approach, such as the risk of cognitive overload or the need for strong self-regulation skills from students.

Overall, the study presents a compelling active learning methodology for online engineering education, but further research is needed to fully understand its long-term impacts and optimize the approach for different learner populations and contexts.

Conclusion

This study proposes an Active Learning (AL) methodology to teach electronics, physical computing, programming, and robotics in online engineering education. The methodology combines in-home laboratories, student-created content, and teacher support to foster hands-on experimentation and active engagement.

The results suggest that this AL approach can positively impact student motivation, self-efficacy, anxiety reduction, and academic performance in online engineering courses. These findings contribute to the growing body of research on active learning strategies for online and blended learning environments.

The methodology and insights from this study can be valuable for researchers and practitioners interested in developing effective active learning experiences for engineering students, particularly in online or hybrid learning settings. Further research is needed to explore the long-term impacts and optimize the approach for different learner populations and contexts.