Broadcasting on Adversarial Multiple Access Channels

Read original: arXiv:2112.14655 - Published 5/31/2024 by Bader A. Aldawsari, Bogdan S. Chlebus, Dariusz R. Kowalski
Total Score

0

🤖

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper focuses on deterministic distributed algorithms for broadcasting on multiple-access channels.
  • Packet injection is modeled using leaky-bucket adversaries, which can activate at most one station per round.
  • The communication model includes an upper bound on the number of stations activated in a round, individual injection rates, and randomness in generating and injecting packets.
  • The researchers demonstrate that some broadcast algorithms designed for ad-hoc channels have better latency performance when executed on channels with a fixed number of stations against single-station adversaries, compared to the general leaky-bucket model.
  • Experiments are conducted to compare the performance of deterministic and randomized backoff algorithms against randomized adversaries.

Plain English Explanation

In this research, the authors study how information can be effectively shared, or broadcast, across a network of connected devices, such as wireless sensors or multi-agent systems. They use a model that represents the communication process as a multiple-access channel, where multiple devices can transmit data at the same time, but this can sometimes lead to collisions and lost information.

The researchers simulate different types of disruptions to the communication channel, using what they call "leaky-bucket adversaries." These adversaries can selectively activate (or turn on) individual devices in the network, which can interfere with the broadcast process. The researchers find that some existing broadcast algorithms designed for more chaotic "ad-hoc" networks can actually perform better in settings with a fixed number of devices, as long as the adversary can only activate one device at a time.

The paper also looks at how the individual "injection rates" of devices - that is, how often they try to send data - can impact the overall latency, or delay, in getting information broadcast across the network. The researchers compare the performance of different deterministic and randomized algorithms in experiments against various types of adversaries.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates deterministic distributed algorithms for broadcasting on multiple-access channels, where multiple stations can transmit data simultaneously. Packet injection is modeled using leaky-bucket adversaries, which can activate at most one station per round.

The communication model includes an upper bound on the number of stations activated in a round, individual injection rates for each station, and randomness in generating and injecting packets. The researchers demonstrate that some broadcast algorithms designed for ad-hoc channels have better latency performance when executed on channels with a fixed number of stations against single-station adversaries, compared to the general leaky-bucket model.

The paper presents the results of experiments comparing the performance of deterministic and randomized backoff algorithms against randomized adversaries. The experiments cover both deterministic algorithms and randomized backoff algorithms.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough investigation of deterministic distributed broadcast algorithms in the presence of leaky-bucket adversaries. However, the research is limited to a specific communication model with a fixed number of stations and adversaries that can activate at most one station per round. It would be interesting to see how the algorithms perform in more dynamic environments with varying numbers of stations and more powerful adversaries.

Additionally, the paper does not provide much discussion on the practical implications or real-world applications of the findings. It would be helpful to understand how these results could inform the design of reliable communication systems or multi-agent coordination protocols.

Overall, the research represents a valuable contribution to the understanding of deterministic broadcast algorithms in the presence of adversarial disruptions, but further work is needed to explore the broader applicability and practical relevance of the findings.

Conclusion

This paper presents a study of deterministic distributed algorithms for broadcasting on multiple-access channels, where packet injection is modeled using leaky-bucket adversaries. The researchers demonstrate that some existing broadcast algorithms designed for ad-hoc networks can perform better in settings with a fixed number of stations, as long as the adversary can only activate one station at a time.

The paper also explores the impact of individual injection rates on the latency of the broadcast process, and compares the performance of deterministic and randomized backoff algorithms against various types of adversaries. While the research is limited to a specific communication model, it provides valuable insights into the design of robust and efficient broadcast protocols for distributed systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤖

Total Score

0

Broadcasting on Adversarial Multiple Access Channels

Bader A. Aldawsari, Bogdan S. Chlebus, Dariusz R. Kowalski

We study deterministic distributed algorithms for broadcasting on multiple-access channels. Packet injection is modeled by leaky-bucket adversaries. There is a fixed set of stations attached to a channel. Additional features of the model of communication include an upper bound on the number of stations activated in a round, an individual injection rate, and randomness in generating and injecting packets. We demonstrate that some broadcast algorithms designed for ad-hoc channels have bounded latency for increased ranges of injection rates than in ad-hoc channels when executed on channels with a fixed number of stations against adversaries that can activate at most one station per round. Individual injection rates are shown to impact latency, as compared to the model of general leaky bucket adversaries. Outcomes of experiments are given that compare the performance of broadcast algorithms against randomized adversaries. The experiments include deterministic algorithms and randomized backoff algorithms.

Read more

5/31/2024

🐍

Total Score

0

Time Complexity of Broadcast and Consensus for Randomized Oblivious Message Adversaries

Antoine El-Hayek, Monika Henzinger, Stefan Schmid

Broadcast and consensus are most fundamental tasks in distributed computing. These tasks are particularly challenging in dynamic networks where communication across the network links may be unreliable, e.g., due to mobility or failures. Indeed, over the last years, researchers have derived several impossibility results and high time complexity lower bounds (i.e., linear in the number of nodes $n$) for these tasks, even for oblivious message adversaries where communication networks are rooted trees. However, such deterministic adversarial models may be overly conservative, as many processes in real-world settings are stochastic in nature rather than worst case. This paper initiates the study of broadcast and consensus on stochastic dynamic networks, introducing a randomized oblivious message adversary. Our model is reminiscent of the SI model in epidemics, however, revolving around trees (which renders the analysis harder due to the apparent lack of independence). In particular, we show that if information dissemination occurs along random rooted trees, broadcast and consensus complete fast with high probability, namely in logarithmic time. Our analysis proves the independence of a key variable, which enables a formal understanding of the dissemination process. More formally, for a network with $n$ nodes, we first consider the completely random case where in each round the communication network is chosen uniformly at random among rooted trees. We then introduce the notion of randomized oblivious message adversary, where in each round, an adversary can choose $k$ edges to appear in the communication network, and then a rooted tree is chosen uniformly at random among the set of all rooted trees that include these edges. We show that broadcast completes in $O(k+log n)$ rounds, and that this it is also the case for consensus as long as $k le 0.1n$.

Read more

8/21/2024

Memory Lower Bounds and Impossibility Results for Anonymous Dynamic Broadcast
Total Score

0

Memory Lower Bounds and Impossibility Results for Anonymous Dynamic Broadcast

Garrett Parzych, Joshua J. Daymude

Broadcast is a ubiquitous distributed computing problem that underpins many other system tasks. In static, connected networks, it was recently shown that broadcast is solvable without any node memory and only constant-size messages in worst-case asymptotically optimal time (Hussak and Trehan, PODC'19/STACS'20/DC'23). In the dynamic setting of adversarial topology changes, however, existing algorithms rely on identifiers, port labels, or polynomial memory to solve broadcast and compute functions over node inputs. We investigate space-efficient, terminating broadcast algorithms for anonymous, synchronous, 1-interval connected dynamic networks and introduce the first memory lower bounds in this setting. Specifically, we prove that broadcast with termination detection is impossible for idle-start algorithms (where only the broadcaster can initially send messages) and otherwise requires $Omega(log n)$ memory per node, where $n$ is the number of nodes in the network. Even if the termination condition is relaxed to stabilizing termination (eventually no additional messages are sent), we show that any idle-start algorithm must use $omega(1)$ memory per node, separating the static and dynamic settings for anonymous broadcast. This lower bound is not far from optimal, as we present an algorithm that solves broadcast with stabilizing termination using $mathcal{O}(log n)$ memory per node in worst-case asymptotically optimal time. In sum, these results reveal the necessity of non-constant memory for nontrivial terminating computation in anonymous dynamic networks.

Read more

7/16/2024

Total Score

0

Fast White-Box Adversarial Streaming Without a Random Oracle

Ying Feng, Aayush Jain, David P. Woodruff

Recently, the question of adversarially robust streaming, where the stream is allowed to depend on the randomness of the streaming algorithm, has gained a lot of attention. In this work, we consider a strong white-box adversarial model (Ajtai et al. PODS 2022), in which the adversary has access to all past random coins and the parameters used by the streaming algorithm. We focus on the sparse recovery problem and extend our result to other tasks such as distinct element estimation and low-rank approximation of matrices and tensors. The main drawback of previous work is that it requires a random oracle, which is especially problematic in the streaming model since the amount of randomness is counted in the space complexity of a streaming algorithm. Also, the previous work suffers from large update time. We construct a near-optimal solution for the sparse recovery problem in white-box adversarial streams, based on the subexponentially secure Learning with Errors assumption. Importantly, our solution does not require a random oracle and has a polylogarithmic per item processing time. We also give results in a related white-box adversarially robust distributed model. Our constructions are based on homomorphic encryption schemes satisfying very mild structural properties that are currently satisfied by most known schemes.

Read more

6/12/2024