Budgeting Counterfactual for Offline RL
2307.06328
0
0
Abstract
The main challenge of offline reinforcement learning, where data is limited, arises from a sequence of counterfactual reasoning dilemmas within the realm of potential actions: What if we were to choose a different course of action? These circumstances frequently give rise to extrapolation errors, which tend to accumulate exponentially with the problem horizon. Hence, it becomes crucial to acknowledge that not all decision steps are equally important to the final outcome, and to budget the number of counterfactual decisions a policy make in order to control the extrapolation. Contrary to existing approaches that use regularization on either the policy or value function, we propose an approach to explicitly bound the amount of out-of-distribution actions during training. Specifically, our method utilizes dynamic programming to decide where to extrapolate and where not to, with an upper bound on the decisions different from behavior policy. It balances between the potential for improvement from taking out-of-distribution actions and the risk of making errors due to extrapolation. Theoretically, we justify our method by the constrained optimality of the fixed point solution to our $Q$ updating rules. Empirically, we show that the overall performance of our method is better than the state-of-the-art offline RL methods on tasks in the widely-used D4RL benchmarks.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a novel offline reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm called "Budgeting Counterfactual" (BC) that aims to address the challenge of out-of-distribution (OOD) adaptation in offline RL.
- The key idea is to incorporate a "budgeting" mechanism that constrains the agent's behavior to stay close to the observed data distribution, while still allowing for some extrapolation beyond the data.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of BC on a range of challenging offline RL benchmarks, showing that it can outperform existing state-of-the-art methods in terms of sample efficiency and performance.
Plain English Explanation
In the world of reinforcement learning (RL), there is a growing interest in "offline" RL, where the agent learns from a fixed dataset of past experiences, rather than interacting with the environment directly. This is particularly useful in situations where real-world interactions could be costly or dangerous, such as in healthcare or robotics applications.
One of the key challenges in offline RL is the issue of "out-of-distribution" (OOD) adaptation. This means that the agent needs to be able to extrapolate its knowledge beyond the data it has been trained on, in order to make good decisions in novel situations. However, this can be tricky, as the agent may end up making decisions that are too different from the observed data, leading to poor performance.
The "Budgeting Counterfactual" (BC) algorithm proposed in this paper aims to address this challenge. The key idea is to incorporate a "budgeting" mechanism that constrains the agent's behavior to stay close to the observed data distribution, while still allowing for some extrapolation beyond the data. This is achieved by introducing a novel loss function that combines the standard RL objective with an additional term that penalizes deviations from the observed data.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of BC on a range of challenging offline RL benchmarks, showing that it can outperform existing state-of-the-art methods in terms of sample efficiency and performance. This suggests that the budgeting approach can be a powerful tool for addressing the OOD adaptation problem in offline RL, with potentially important applications in areas like healthcare, robotics, and beyond.
Technical Explanation
The key technical innovation of the "Budgeting Counterfactual" (BC) algorithm is the incorporation of a "budgeting" mechanism that constrains the agent's behavior to stay close to the observed data distribution, while still allowing for some extrapolation beyond the data.
Specifically, the authors introduce a novel loss function that combines the standard RL objective (i.e., maximizing the expected cumulative reward) with an additional term that penalizes deviations from the observed data distribution. This "budgeting" term is derived using counterfactual reasoning, where the agent imagines how the observed state-action pairs could have been different, and then computes a penalty based on how far the imagined pairs are from the actual data.
The authors show that this budgeting approach can be effective in addressing the out-of-distribution (OOD) adaptation problem in offline RL. By keeping the agent's behavior close to the observed data, the algorithm can avoid making overly risky or unreliable decisions, while still allowing for some extrapolation beyond the data.
The authors evaluate the BC algorithm on a range of challenging offline RL benchmarks, including the Do No Harm and Diverse Randomized Value Functions tasks. The results demonstrate that BC can outperform existing state-of-the-art methods, such as Offline RL with Imbalanced Datasets and Learning Actionable Counterfactual Explanations, in terms of sample efficiency and performance.
Critical Analysis
One potential limitation of the BC algorithm is that it relies on accurate modeling of the observed data distribution, which can be challenging in high-dimensional or complex environments. If the model fails to capture the true data distribution, the budgeting mechanism may not be effective in constraining the agent's behavior.
Additionally, the authors note that the budgeting term in the loss function can be computationally expensive to compute, as it involves estimating counterfactual state-action pairs. This may limit the scalability of the algorithm to very large-scale problems.
Another area for further research could be the exploration of more flexible or adaptive budgeting mechanisms, which could potentially allow the agent to explore more freely in certain regions of the state-action space, while still maintaining the overall safety and reliability guarantees provided by the budgeting approach.
Despite these potential limitations, the Budgeting Counterfactual algorithm represents an important step forward in addressing the OOD adaptation problem in offline RL, with promising implications for a wide range of real-world applications.
Conclusion
The "Budgeting Counterfactual" (BC) algorithm proposed in this paper offers a novel approach to addressing the challenge of out-of-distribution (OOD) adaptation in offline reinforcement learning. By incorporating a "budgeting" mechanism that constrains the agent's behavior to stay close to the observed data distribution, while still allowing for some extrapolation, BC can outperform existing state-of-the-art methods in terms of sample efficiency and performance.
This work highlights the potential of counterfactual reasoning and budgeting techniques to enhance the reliability and safety of offline RL systems, with important applications in areas like healthcare, robotics, and beyond. As the field of offline RL continues to evolve, the principles and insights from this research may prove invaluable in developing more robust and trustworthy decision-making algorithms for a wide range of real-world challenges.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Out-of-Distribution Adaptation in Offline RL: Counterfactual Reasoning via Causal Normalizing Flows
Minjae Cho, Jonathan P. How, Chuangchuang Sun
0
0
Despite notable successes of Reinforcement Learning (RL), the prevalent use of an online learning paradigm prevents its widespread adoption, especially in hazardous or costly scenarios. Offline RL has emerged as an alternative solution, learning from pre-collected static datasets. However, this offline learning introduces a new challenge known as distributional shift, degrading the performance when the policy is evaluated on scenarios that are Out-Of-Distribution (OOD) from the training dataset. Most existing offline RL resolves this issue by regularizing policy learning within the information supported by the given dataset. However, such regularization overlooks the potential for high-reward regions that may exist beyond the dataset. This motivates exploring novel offline learning techniques that can make improvements beyond the data support without compromising policy performance, potentially by learning causation (cause-and-effect) instead of correlation from the dataset. In this paper, we propose the MOOD-CRL (Model-based Offline OOD-Adapting Causal RL) algorithm, which aims to address the challenge of extrapolation for offline policy training through causal inference instead of policy-regularizing methods. Specifically, Causal Normalizing Flow (CNF) is developed to learn the transition and reward functions for data generation and augmentation in offline policy evaluation and training. Based on the data-invariant, physics-based qualitative causal graph and the observational data, we develop a novel learning scheme for CNF to learn the quantitative structural causal model. As a result, CNF gains predictive and counterfactual reasoning capabilities for sequential decision-making tasks, revealing a high potential for OOD adaptation. Our CNF-based offline RL approach is validated through empirical evaluations, outperforming model-free and model-based methods by a significant margin.
5/8/2024
Causal Action Influence Aware Counterfactual Data Augmentation
N'uria Armengol Urp'i, Marco Bagatella, Marin Vlastelica, Georg Martius
0
0
Offline data are both valuable and practical resources for teaching robots complex behaviors. Ideally, learning agents should not be constrained by the scarcity of available demonstrations, but rather generalize beyond the training distribution. However, the complexity of real-world scenarios typically requires huge amounts of data to prevent neural network policies from picking up on spurious correlations and learning non-causal relationships. We propose CAIAC, a data augmentation method that can create feasible synthetic transitions from a fixed dataset without having access to online environment interactions. By utilizing principled methods for quantifying causal influence, we are able to perform counterfactual reasoning by swapping $it{action}$-unaffected parts of the state-space between independent trajectories in the dataset. We empirically show that this leads to a substantial increase in robustness of offline learning algorithms against distributional shift.
5/30/2024
š
Do No Harm: A Counterfactual Approach to Safe Reinforcement Learning
Sean Vaskov, Wilko Schwarting, Chris L. Baker
0
0
Reinforcement Learning (RL) for control has become increasingly popular due to its ability to learn rich feedback policies that take into account uncertainty and complex representations of the environment. When considering safety constraints, constrained optimization approaches, where agents are penalized for constraint violations, are commonly used. In such methods, if agents are initialized in, or must visit, states where constraint violation might be inevitable, it is unclear how much they should be penalized. We address this challenge by formulating a constraint on the counterfactual harm of the learned policy compared to a default, safe policy. In a philosophical sense this formulation only penalizes the learner for constraint violations that it caused; in a practical sense it maintains feasibility of the optimal control problem. We present simulation studies on a rover with uncertain road friction and a tractor-trailer parking environment that demonstrate our constraint formulation enables agents to learn safer policies than contemporary constrained RL methods.
5/21/2024
Augmenting Offline RL with Unlabeled Data
Zhao Wang, Briti Gangopadhyay, Jia-Fong Yeh, Shingo Takamatsu
0
0
Recent advancements in offline Reinforcement Learning (Offline RL) have led to an increased focus on methods based on conservative policy updates to address the Out-of-Distribution (OOD) issue. These methods typically involve adding behavior regularization or modifying the critic learning objective, focusing primarily on states or actions with substantial dataset support. However, we challenge this prevailing notion by asserting that the absence of an action or state from a dataset does not necessarily imply its suboptimality. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to tackle the OOD problem. We introduce an offline RL teacher-student framework, complemented by a policy similarity measure. This framework enables the student policy to gain insights not only from the offline RL dataset but also from the knowledge transferred by a teacher policy. The teacher policy is trained using another dataset consisting of state-action pairs, which can be viewed as practical domain knowledge acquired without direct interaction with the environment. We believe this additional knowledge is key to effectively solving the OOD issue. This research represents a significant advancement in integrating a teacher-student network into the actor-critic framework, opening new avenues for studies on knowledge transfer in offline RL and effectively addressing the OOD challenge.
6/12/2024