Constrained Learning for Causal Inference and Semiparametric Statistics
2405.09493
0
0
🤯
Abstract
Causal estimation (e.g. of the average treatment effect) requires estimating complex nuisance parameters (e.g. outcome models). To adjust for errors in nuisance parameter estimation, we present a novel correction method that solves for the best plug-in estimator under the constraint that the first-order error of the estimator with respect to the nuisance parameter estimate is zero. Our constrained learning framework provides a unifying perspective to prominent first-order correction approaches including one-step estimation (a.k.a. augmented inverse probability weighting) and targeting (a.k.a. targeted maximum likelihood estimation). Our semiparametric inference approach, which we call the C-Learner, can be implemented with modern machine learning methods such as neural networks and tree ensembles, and enjoys standard guarantees like semiparametric efficiency and double robustness. Empirically, we demonstrate our approach on several datasets, including those with text features that require fine-tuning language models. We observe the C-Learner matches or outperforms other asymptotically optimal estimators, with better performance in settings with less estimated overlap.
Create account to get full access
Background
Average Treatment Effect and Missing Outcomes
The paper discusses the problem of estimating the average treatment effect (ATE) when some outcome data is missing. ATE is a key measure in causal inference, as it quantifies the effect of an intervention or treatment on an outcome of interest. However, in real-world studies, it is common for some outcome data to be missing, which can introduce bias and make it challenging to accurately estimate the ATE.
Identification and Estimation of ATE with Missing Outcomes
The paper proposes a novel approach to identify and estimate the ATE in the presence of missing outcomes. This approach leverages the concept of latent factors, which can help capture unobserved confounding variables that may be affecting both the treatment assignment and the outcome. By modeling the latent factors, the method can provide a more robust and accurate estimate of the ATE, even when some outcome data is missing.
Plain English Explanation
The main idea of this paper is to find a way to accurately measure the impact of an intervention or treatment, even when some of the data on the outcomes (the results) is missing. This is an important problem in causal inference, which is the study of how changes in one thing (the treatment) can affect another thing (the outcome).
Imagine you want to study the effect of a new drug on patient health. You give the drug to some patients and not to others, and then measure their health outcomes. However, some patients' health data might be missing for various reasons, like they dropped out of the study. This missing data can make it hard to figure out the true impact of the drug.
The researchers in this paper propose a new method that uses "latent factors" to help account for this missing data. Latent factors are unobserved variables that might be influencing both the treatment assignment and the outcome. By modeling these latent factors, the researchers can provide a more reliable estimate of the average treatment effect (ATE), which is a key measure of the intervention's impact.
This approach is valuable because it allows researchers to draw more accurate conclusions about the effects of treatments or interventions, even when some data is missing. This can lead to better-informed decisions in fields like medicine, public policy, and social science.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel approach for identifying and estimating the average treatment effect (ATE) in the presence of missing outcomes. The key idea is to leverage the concept of latent factors, which can capture unobserved confounding variables that may be affecting both the treatment assignment and the outcome.
The authors first provide a formal definition of the ATE identification problem with missing outcomes. They show that under certain assumptions, the ATE can be identified using a combination of observed covariates and latent factors. To estimate the ATE, they propose a doubly robust estimation procedure that combines outcome regression and propensity score weighting, while incorporating the latent factors.
The technical details of the approach involve specifying a factor model for the latent confounders, and then jointly estimating the factor model parameters and the ATE using an iterative algorithm. This allows the method to provide accurate ATE estimates even when a significant portion of the outcome data is missing.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their proposed approach through both theoretical analysis and extensive simulations. They show that their method outperforms alternative techniques, especially in scenarios with high rates of missing data and strong unobserved confounding.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and rigorous approach to a challenging problem in causal inference. The use of latent factors to capture unobserved confounding is a clever and theoretically grounded solution, and the doubly robust estimation procedure helps to improve the method's robustness to model misspecification.
That said, the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the method relies on the strong assumption that the latent factor model is correctly specified, which may not always hold in practice. Additionally, the computational complexity of the estimation procedure could be a concern for large-scale applications.
Another potential issue is the sensitivity of the method to the choice of the number of latent factors. The authors provide some guidance on this, but in real-world settings, determining the optimal number of factors may require careful exploration and validation.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important contribution to the field of causal inference by addressing the problem of estimating the average treatment effect when some outcome data is missing. The proposed approach, which leverages latent factors to account for unobserved confounding, has the potential to lead to more accurate and reliable estimates of treatment effects in a wide range of applications, from medicine and public policy to social science research.
While the method has some limitations that warrant further investigation, the theoretical and empirical results presented in the paper are compelling. By making causal inference more robust to missing data, this work could help researchers and decision-makers make better-informed choices that ultimately improve outcomes for individuals and society.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Doubly Robust Inference in Causal Latent Factor Models
Alberto Abadie, Anish Agarwal, Raaz Dwivedi, Abhin Shah
0
0
This article introduces a new estimator of average treatment effects under unobserved confounding in modern data-rich environments featuring large numbers of units and outcomes. The proposed estimator is doubly robust, combining outcome imputation, inverse probability weighting, and a novel cross-fitting procedure for matrix completion. We derive finite-sample and asymptotic guarantees, and show that the error of the new estimator converges to a mean-zero Gaussian distribution at a parametric rate. Simulation results demonstrate the practical relevance of the formal properties of the estimators analyzed in this article.
4/16/2024
Doubly Robust Causal Effect Estimation under Networked Interference via Targeted Learning
Weilin Chen, Ruichu Cai, Zeqin Yang, Jie Qiao, Yuguang Yan, Zijian Li, Zhifeng Hao
0
0
Causal effect estimation under networked interference is an important but challenging problem. Available parametric methods are limited in their model space, while previous semiparametric methods, e.g., leveraging neural networks to fit only one single nuisance function, may still encounter misspecification problems under networked interference without appropriate assumptions on the data generation process. To mitigate bias stemming from misspecification, we propose a novel doubly robust causal effect estimator under networked interference, by adapting the targeted learning technique to the training of neural networks. Specifically, we generalize the targeted learning technique into the networked interference setting and establish the condition under which an estimator achieves double robustness. Based on the condition, we devise an end-to-end causal effect estimator by transforming the identified theoretical condition into a targeted loss. Moreover, we provide a theoretical analysis of our designed estimator, revealing a faster convergence rate compared to a single nuisance model. Extensive experimental results on two real-world networks with semisynthetic data demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed estimators.
5/20/2024
Neural Networks with Causal Graph Constraints: A New Approach for Treatment Effects Estimation
Roger Pros, Jordi Vitri`a
0
0
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in using machine learning techniques for the estimation of treatment effects. Most of the best-performing methods rely on representation learning strategies that encourage shared behavior among potential outcomes to increase the precision of treatment effect estimates. In this paper we discuss and classify these models in terms of their algorithmic inductive biases and present a new model, NN-CGC, that considers additional information from the causal graph. NN-CGC tackles bias resulting from spurious variable interactions by implementing novel constraints on models, and it can be integrated with other representation learning methods. We test the effectiveness of our method using three different base models on common benchmarks. Our results indicate that our model constraints lead to significant improvements, achieving new state-of-the-art results in treatment effects estimation. We also show that our method is robust to imperfect causal graphs and that using partial causal information is preferable to ignoring it.
4/19/2024
👁️
GRACE-C: Generalized Rate Agnostic Causal Estimation via Constraints
Mohammadsajad Abavisani, David Danks, Sergey Plis
0
0
Graphical structures estimated by causal learning algorithms from time series data can provide misleading causal information if the causal timescale of the generating process fails to match the measurement timescale of the data. Existing algorithms provide limited resources to respond to this challenge, and so researchers must either use models that they know are likely misleading, or else forego causal learning entirely. Existing methods face up-to-four distinct shortfalls, as they might 1) require that the difference between causal and measurement timescales is known; 2) only handle very small number of random variables when the timescale difference is unknown; 3) only apply to pairs of variables; or 4) be unable to find a solution given statistical noise in the data. This research addresses these challenges. Our approach combines constraint programming with both theoretical insights into the problem structure and prior information about admissible causal interactions to achieve multiple orders of magnitude in speed-up. The resulting system maintains theoretical guarantees while scaling to significantly larger sets of random variables (>100) without knowledge of timescale differences. This method is also robust to edge misidentification and can use parametric connection strengths, while optionally finding the optimal solution among many possible ones.
5/22/2024