GRACE-C: Generalized Rate Agnostic Causal Estimation via Constraints
2205.09235
0
0
👁️
Abstract
Graphical structures estimated by causal learning algorithms from time series data can provide misleading causal information if the causal timescale of the generating process fails to match the measurement timescale of the data. Existing algorithms provide limited resources to respond to this challenge, and so researchers must either use models that they know are likely misleading, or else forego causal learning entirely. Existing methods face up-to-four distinct shortfalls, as they might 1) require that the difference between causal and measurement timescales is known; 2) only handle very small number of random variables when the timescale difference is unknown; 3) only apply to pairs of variables; or 4) be unable to find a solution given statistical noise in the data. This research addresses these challenges. Our approach combines constraint programming with both theoretical insights into the problem structure and prior information about admissible causal interactions to achieve multiple orders of magnitude in speed-up. The resulting system maintains theoretical guarantees while scaling to significantly larger sets of random variables (>100) without knowledge of timescale differences. This method is also robust to edge misidentification and can use parametric connection strengths, while optionally finding the optimal solution among many possible ones.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Causal learning algorithms can produce misleading causal information when the timescale of the underlying process does not match the measurement timescale of the data.
- Existing algorithms have limited ability to address this challenge, often requiring knowledge of the timescale difference or only working for a small number of variables.
- This research proposes a new approach that combines constraint programming with theoretical insights and prior information about admissible causal interactions to achieve significant speed improvements and scale to larger sets of variables without needing to know the timescale difference.
Plain English Explanation
When we try to learn the causal relationships between variables from time series data using algorithms, the resulting causal graphs can be misleading if the timescale of the underlying causal process is different from the timescale at which the data was measured. For example, if the causal relationships happen on a weekly or monthly basis, but the data was collected daily, the algorithms may not be able to accurately capture the true causal structure.
Existing methods to address this problem have some limitations. Some require that the difference between the causal and measurement timescales is already known, which is often not the case in real-world scenarios. Others can only handle a very small number of variables when the timescale difference is unknown. Some are limited to only looking at pairs of variables, and others may not be able to find a solution at all due to statistical noise in the data.
This research proposes a new approach that combines constraint programming with theoretical insights and prior information about the types of causal interactions that are possible. This allows the algorithm to be much faster and scale to significantly larger sets of variables (over 100) without needing to know the timescale difference. The method is also robust to errors in identifying the causal connections and can use information about the strength of the causal relationships, while still being able to find the optimal causal graph among many possibilities.
Technical Explanation
The researchers' approach builds on previous work that used constraint programming to learn causal graphs from data. By incorporating both theoretical insights into the problem structure and prior information about admissible causal interactions, they were able to achieve significant speed-ups compared to existing methods.
Specifically, the algorithm uses constraint programming to efficiently search the space of possible causal graphs, guided by constraints derived from the causal timescale mismatch problem and prior knowledge about the types of causal interactions that are possible. This allows the method to scale to larger numbers of variables without requiring knowledge of the timescale difference.
The algorithm is also designed to be robust to edge misidentification and can optionally use information about the strength of the causal relationships to find the optimal causal graph among many possible solutions.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that their approach still has some limitations. While it can scale to larger variable sets than previous methods, the exact number of variables it can handle is not specified. Additionally, the paper does not explore the algorithm's performance in the presence of very large timescale differences or highly complex causal structures.
Another potential issue is that the method relies on prior information about admissible causal interactions, which may not always be available or accurate. In real-world scenarios, the true causal structure may not conform to the researchers' assumptions, which could lead to biased results.
It would also be helpful to see the algorithm tested on a wider range of real-world datasets, beyond the synthetic examples presented in the paper, to better understand its practical applicability and limitations.
Conclusion
This research presents a promising approach to addressing the challenge of causal learning from time series data when the causal and measurement timescales do not match. By combining constraint programming with theoretical insights and prior knowledge, the algorithm is able to scale to larger variable sets and maintain robustness to certain types of errors, while still providing theoretical guarantees.
While the method has some limitations, it represents an important step forward in the field of causal discovery, and the insights and techniques developed in this work could inspire further advancements in this area. As researchers continue to grapple with the complexities of causal inference, approaches like this that leverage multiple sources of information and exploit the structure of the problem may prove increasingly valuable.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Neural Networks with Causal Graph Constraints: A New Approach for Treatment Effects Estimation
Roger Pros, Jordi Vitri`a
0
0
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in using machine learning techniques for the estimation of treatment effects. Most of the best-performing methods rely on representation learning strategies that encourage shared behavior among potential outcomes to increase the precision of treatment effect estimates. In this paper we discuss and classify these models in terms of their algorithmic inductive biases and present a new model, NN-CGC, that considers additional information from the causal graph. NN-CGC tackles bias resulting from spurious variable interactions by implementing novel constraints on models, and it can be integrated with other representation learning methods. We test the effectiveness of our method using three different base models on common benchmarks. Our results indicate that our model constraints lead to significant improvements, achieving new state-of-the-art results in treatment effects estimation. We also show that our method is robust to imperfect causal graphs and that using partial causal information is preferable to ignoring it.
4/19/2024
🤷
Sample, estimate, aggregate: A recipe for causal discovery foundation models
Menghua Wu, Yujia Bao, Regina Barzilay, Tommi Jaakkola
0
0
Causal discovery, the task of inferring causal structure from data, promises to accelerate scientific research, inform policy making, and more. However, causal discovery algorithms over larger sets of variables tend to be brittle against misspecification or when data are limited. To mitigate these challenges, we train a supervised model that learns to predict a larger causal graph from the outputs of classical causal discovery algorithms run over subsets of variables, along with other statistical hints like inverse covariance. Our approach is enabled by the observation that typical errors in the outputs of classical methods remain comparable across datasets. Theoretically, we show that this model is well-specified, in the sense that it can recover a causal graph consistent with graphs over subsets. Empirically, we train the model to be robust to erroneous estimates using diverse synthetic data. Experiments on real and synthetic data demonstrate that this model maintains high accuracy in the face of misspecification or distribution shift, and can be adapted at low cost to different discovery algorithms or choice of statistics.
5/24/2024
🌿
Hybrid Global Causal Discovery with Local Search
Sujai Hiremath, Jacqueline R. M. A. Maasch, Mengxiao Gao, Promit Ghosal, Kyra Gan
0
0
Learning the unique directed acyclic graph corresponding to an unknown causal model is a challenging task. Methods based on functional causal models can identify a unique graph, but either suffer from the curse of dimensionality or impose strong parametric assumptions. To address these challenges, we propose a novel hybrid approach for global causal discovery in observational data that leverages local causal substructures. We first present a topological sorting algorithm that leverages ancestral relationships in linear structural equation models to establish a compact top-down hierarchical ordering, encoding more causal information than linear orderings produced by existing methods. We demonstrate that this approach generalizes to nonlinear settings with arbitrary noise. We then introduce a nonparametric constraint-based algorithm that prunes spurious edges by searching for local conditioning sets, achieving greater accuracy than current methods. We provide theoretical guarantees for correctness and worst-case polynomial time complexities, with empirical validation on synthetic data.
5/24/2024
🤯
Constrained Learning for Causal Inference and Semiparametric Statistics
Tiffany Tianhui Cai, Yuri Fonseca, Kaiwen Hou, Hongseok Namkoong
0
0
Causal estimation (e.g. of the average treatment effect) requires estimating complex nuisance parameters (e.g. outcome models). To adjust for errors in nuisance parameter estimation, we present a novel correction method that solves for the best plug-in estimator under the constraint that the first-order error of the estimator with respect to the nuisance parameter estimate is zero. Our constrained learning framework provides a unifying perspective to prominent first-order correction approaches including one-step estimation (a.k.a. augmented inverse probability weighting) and targeting (a.k.a. targeted maximum likelihood estimation). Our semiparametric inference approach, which we call the C-Learner, can be implemented with modern machine learning methods such as neural networks and tree ensembles, and enjoys standard guarantees like semiparametric efficiency and double robustness. Empirically, we demonstrate our approach on several datasets, including those with text features that require fine-tuning language models. We observe the C-Learner matches or outperforms other asymptotically optimal estimators, with better performance in settings with less estimated overlap.
5/24/2024