Calibration Attacks: A Comprehensive Study of Adversarial Attacks on Model Confidence

Read original: arXiv:2401.02718 - Published 5/21/2024 by Stephen Obadinma, Xiaodan Zhu, Hongyu Guo
Total Score

0

Calibration Attacks: A Comprehensive Study of Adversarial Attacks on Model Confidence

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a new framework called "Calibration Attack" for crafting adversarial attacks that target the calibration of machine learning models.
  • Calibration refers to the alignment between a model's predicted probabilities and the true probability of the outcomes.
  • The authors demonstrate how Calibration Attack can be used to generate adversarial examples that significantly degrade a model's calibration, even without substantially impacting its accuracy.
  • The paper also explores the broader implications of their findings for the robustness and reliability of deep learning systems.

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning models are often used to make important decisions, such as medical diagnoses or financial predictions. These models typically provide probability estimates along with their predictions - for example, a model might say there is a 90% chance of a certain outcome.

<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/calibration-deep-learning-survey-state-art">Calibration</a> refers to how well aligned these probability estimates are with the true likelihood of the outcomes. A well-calibrated model will have probability estimates that closely match the real-world probabilities.

In this paper, the researchers developed a new technique called "Calibration Attack" that can be used to deliberately reduce a model's calibration, even without significantly changing its overall accuracy. This means they can craft adversarial examples that trick the model into giving inaccurate probability estimates, while still getting the right overall prediction.

<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/calibration-continual-learning-models">The authors demonstrate</a> how Calibration Attack can be used to generate these kinds of adversarial examples, which could have serious implications for the reliability and robustness of deep learning systems in high-stakes applications.

Technical Explanation

The key idea behind Calibration Attack is to optimize adversarial perturbations that specifically target a model's calibration, rather than just its overall prediction accuracy. To do this, the authors introduce a novel loss function that captures calibration error, which they minimize during the adversarial attack process.

<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/optimizing-calibration-by-gaining-aware-prediction-correctness">They evaluate their approach</a> on several popular computer vision and natural language processing models, and show that Calibration Attack can significantly degrade calibration while only causing minor changes to the models' overall accuracy.

<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/from-attack-to-defense-insights-into-deep">The paper also explores the broader implications</a> of these findings, discussing how adversarial attacks that target calibration could undermine the reliability of deep learning systems in safety-critical domains. The authors suggest that developing robust calibration-aware defenses should be a priority for the field.

Critical Analysis

The Calibration Attack framework represents an important advance in adversarial machine learning, as it demonstrates how an attacker can specifically target a model's calibration rather than just its overall accuracy. This is a significant concern, as miscalibrated models can make overconfident or unreliable predictions that could have serious real-world consequences.

That said, the paper does not fully explore the potential real-world impacts of these attacks. The experiments are conducted in a controlled laboratory setting, and it's unclear how Calibration Attack would perform against models deployed in the field. There may be additional defenses or mitigating factors that could limit the attacks' effectiveness in practice.

<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/attackbench-evaluating-gradient-based-attacks-adversarial-examples">Further research is also needed</a> to understand the generalizability of these findings across a wider range of model architectures, datasets, and application domains. The authors acknowledge this as an important area for future work.

Conclusion

Overall, the Calibration Attack framework presented in this paper represents a significant advancement in the field of adversarial machine learning. By targeting a model's calibration rather than just its accuracy, the authors have demonstrated a new and potentially dangerous class of attacks that could undermine the reliability of deep learning systems in high-stakes applications.

While more research is needed to fully understand the real-world implications, this work highlights the importance of developing robust, calibration-aware defenses to ensure the trustworthiness and safety of AI systems. As the use of machine learning continues to grow, addressing these types of adversarial threats will be crucial for realizing the full potential of these technologies.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Calibration Attacks: A Comprehensive Study of Adversarial Attacks on Model Confidence
Total Score

0

Calibration Attacks: A Comprehensive Study of Adversarial Attacks on Model Confidence

Stephen Obadinma, Xiaodan Zhu, Hongyu Guo

In this work, we highlight and perform a comprehensive study on calibration attacks, a form of adversarial attacks that aim to trap victim models to be heavily miscalibrated without altering their predicted labels, hence endangering the trustworthiness of the models and follow-up decision making based on their confidence. We propose four typical forms of calibration attacks: underconfidence, overconfidence, maximum miscalibration, and random confidence attacks, conducted in both the black-box and white-box setups. We demonstrate that the attacks are highly effective on both convolutional and attention-based models: with a small number of queries, they seriously skew confidence without changing the predictive performance. Given the potential danger, we further investigate the effectiveness of a wide range of adversarial defence and recalibration methods, including our proposed defences specifically designed for calibration attacks to mitigate the harm. From the ECE and KS scores, we observe that there are still significant limitations in handling calibration attacks. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first dedicated study that provides a comprehensive investigation on calibration-focused attacks. We hope this study helps attract more attention to these types of attacks and hence hamper their potential serious damages. To this end, this work also provides detailed analyses to understand the characteristics of the attacks.

Read more

5/21/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

Towards Certification of Uncertainty Calibration under Adversarial Attacks

Cornelius Emde, Francesco Pinto, Thomas Lukasiewicz, Philip H. S. Torr, Adel Bibi

Since neural classifiers are known to be sensitive to adversarial perturbations that alter their accuracy, textit{certification methods} have been developed to provide provable guarantees on the insensitivity of their predictions to such perturbations. Furthermore, in safety-critical applications, the frequentist interpretation of the confidence of a classifier (also known as model calibration) can be of utmost importance. This property can be measured via the Brier score or the expected calibration error. We show that attacks can significantly harm calibration, and thus propose certified calibration as worst-case bounds on calibration under adversarial perturbations. Specifically, we produce analytic bounds for the Brier score and approximate bounds via the solution of a mixed-integer program on the expected calibration error. Finally, we propose novel calibration attacks and demonstrate how they can improve model calibration through textit{adversarial calibration training}.

Read more

5/24/2024

Extreme Miscalibration and the Illusion of Adversarial Robustness
Total Score

0

Extreme Miscalibration and the Illusion of Adversarial Robustness

Vyas Raina, Samson Tan, Volkan Cevher, Aditya Rawal, Sheng Zha, George Karypis

Deep learning-based Natural Language Processing (NLP) models are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where small perturbations can cause a model to misclassify. Adversarial Training (AT) is often used to increase model robustness. However, we have discovered an intriguing phenomenon: deliberately or accidentally miscalibrating models masks gradients in a way that interferes with adversarial attack search methods, giving rise to an apparent increase in robustness. We show that this observed gain in robustness is an illusion of robustness (IOR), and demonstrate how an adversary can perform various forms of test-time temperature calibration to nullify the aforementioned interference and allow the adversarial attack to find adversarial examples. Hence, we urge the NLP community to incorporate test-time temperature scaling into their robustness evaluations to ensure that any observed gains are genuine. Finally, we show how the temperature can be scaled during textit{training} to improve genuine robustness.

Read more

6/3/2024

Cautious Calibration in Binary Classification
Total Score

0

Cautious Calibration in Binary Classification

Mari-Liis Allikivi, Joonas Jarve, Meelis Kull

Being cautious is crucial for enhancing the trustworthiness of machine learning systems integrated into decision-making pipelines. Although calibrated probabilities help in optimal decision-making, perfect calibration remains unattainable, leading to estimates that fluctuate between under- and overconfidence. This becomes a critical issue in high-risk scenarios, where even occasional overestimation can lead to extreme expected costs. In these scenarios, it is important for each predicted probability to lean towards underconfidence, rather than just achieving an average balance. In this study, we introduce the novel concept of cautious calibration in binary classification. This approach aims to produce probability estimates that are intentionally underconfident for each predicted probability. We highlight the importance of this approach in a high-risk scenario and propose a theoretically grounded method for learning cautious calibration maps. Through experiments, we explore and compare our method to various approaches, including methods originally not devised for cautious calibration but applicable in this context. We show that our approach is the most consistent in providing cautious estimates. Our work establishes a strong baseline for further developments in this novel framework.

Read more

8/12/2024