Careless Whisper: Speech-to-Text Hallucination Harms
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper examines the issue of "speech-to-text hallucination" - when AI-powered speech recognition systems inaccurately transcribe spoken words.
- The researchers conducted experiments to understand the potential harms caused by these hallucinations and how they impact users.
- The findings offer insights into the challenges of building reliable and trustworthy speech recognition systems.
Plain English Explanation
Speech recognition technology has become increasingly advanced, allowing us to dictate text using our voice. However, these AI-powered systems are not perfect and can sometimes misinterpret the words we say, a phenomenon known as "speech-to-text hallucination."
In this paper, the researchers set out to explore the potential harms caused by these hallucinations. They conducted experiments to understand how these errors can impact users and the implications for building trustworthy speech recognition systems.
The researchers found that speech-to-text hallucinations can have serious consequences, leading to confusion, misunderstandings, and even the spread of misinformation. For example, if a voice assistant transcribes "I have a doctor's appointment tomorrow" as "I have a doctorate in apples," it could result in significant problems.
By shedding light on these issues, the paper highlights the importance of continued research and development to improve the reliability and accuracy of speech recognition technology. As these systems become more prevalent in our lives, it's crucial that they can be trusted to faithfully capture our words and intent.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a series of experiments to investigate the impacts of speech-to-text hallucinations. They recruited a diverse group of participants and asked them to interact with a simulated voice assistant, providing different types of spoken inputs.
The researchers then analyzed the transcriptions generated by the speech recognition system, identifying instances where the text did not accurately reflect the original spoken input. They categorized these hallucinations based on factors like semantic plausibility, grammatical correctness, and potential for harm.
Through this analysis, the researchers were able to quantify the frequency and severity of speech-to-text hallucinations. They found that these errors were not uncommon and could have significant consequences, ranging from minor inconveniences to potentially serious misinformation or legal issues.
The paper also explores potential causes of these hallucinations, such as limitations in the underlying speech recognition algorithms, biases in the training data, or challenges in handling complex or ambiguous speech patterns. The researchers discuss the importance of addressing these technical challenges to improve the reliability and trustworthiness of speech recognition systems.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several caveats and limitations in their study. For example, the experiments were conducted in a controlled lab setting, which may not fully reflect the real-world usage of speech recognition systems. Additionally, the study focused on a specific set of scenarios and interactions, and the findings may not generalize to all possible use cases.
It is also worth noting that the paper does not delve deeply into the potential societal implications of speech-to-text hallucinations. While the researchers highlight the risks of misinformation and legal issues, there may be other social and ethical concerns that warrant further investigation, such as the impact on marginalized communities or the potential for these errors to exacerbate existing biases.
Furthermore, the paper could have benefited from a more comprehensive review of prior research on speech recognition accuracy and error analysis. Comparing the findings to existing literature could provide a stronger contextual framework for understanding the significance of the study.
Despite these limitations, the research presented in this paper is a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to improve the reliability and trustworthiness of speech recognition technology. By drawing attention to the issue of speech-to-text hallucinations, the authors have laid the groundwork for future research and development in this critical area.
Conclusion
This paper offers a comprehensive examination of the challenges posed by speech-to-text hallucinations, highlighting the potential harms and the need for continued advancements in speech recognition technology. The researchers' findings underscore the importance of designing AI systems that can be trusted to accurately capture and represent our spoken language, as these tools become increasingly integrated into our daily lives.
By shedding light on this issue, the paper encourages further research and development to address the technical limitations and potential biases that can lead to speech-to-text hallucinations. Ultimately, the goal should be to create speech recognition systems that are reliable, accurate, and trustworthy, ensuring that they can be safely and effectively utilized across a wide range of applications and contexts.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Careless Whisper: Speech-to-Text Hallucination Harms
Allison Koenecke, Anna Seo Gyeong Choi, Katelyn X. Mei, Hilke Schellmann, Mona Sloane
Speech-to-text services aim to transcribe input audio as accurately as possible. They increasingly play a role in everyday life, for example in personal voice assistants or in customer-company interactions. We evaluate Open AI's Whisper, a state-of-the-art automated speech recognition service outperforming industry competitors, as of 2023. While many of Whisper's transcriptions were highly accurate, we find that roughly 1% of audio transcriptions contained entire hallucinated phrases or sentences which did not exist in any form in the underlying audio. We thematically analyze the Whisper-hallucinated content, finding that 38% of hallucinations include explicit harms such as perpetuating violence, making up inaccurate associations, or implying false authority. We then study why hallucinations occur by observing the disparities in hallucination rates between speakers with aphasia (who have a lowered ability to express themselves using speech and voice) and a control group. We find that hallucinations disproportionately occur for individuals who speak with longer shares of non-vocal durations -- a common symptom of aphasia. We call on industry practitioners to ameliorate these language-model-based hallucinations in Whisper, and to raise awareness of potential biases amplified by hallucinations in downstream applications of speech-to-text models.
Read more5/6/2024
0
Emerging Reliance Behaviors in Human-AI Text Generation: Hallucinations, Data Quality Assessment, and Cognitive Forcing Functions
Zahra Ashktorab, Qian Pan, Werner Geyer, Michael Desmond, Marina Danilevsky, James M. Johnson, Casey Dugan, Michelle Bachman
In this paper, we investigate the impact of hallucinations and cognitive forcing functions in human-AI collaborative text generation tasks, focusing on the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to assist in generating high-quality conversational data. LLMs require data for fine-tuning, a crucial step in enhancing their performance. In the context of conversational customer support, the data takes the form of a conversation between a human customer and an agent and can be generated with an AI assistant. In our inquiry, involving 11 users who each completed 8 tasks, resulting in a total of 88 tasks, we found that the presence of hallucinations negatively impacts the quality of data. We also find that, although the cognitive forcing function does not always mitigate the detrimental effects of hallucinations on data quality, the presence of cognitive forcing functions and hallucinations together impacts data quality and influences how users leverage the AI responses presented to them. Our analysis of user behavior reveals distinct patterns of reliance on AI-generated responses, highlighting the importance of managing hallucinations in AI-generated content within conversational AI contexts.
Read more9/16/2024
0
Developing a Reliable, General-Purpose Hallucination Detection and Mitigation Service: Insights and Lessons Learned
Song Wang, Xun Wang, Jie Mei, Yujia Xie, Sean Muarray, Zhang Li, Lingfeng Wu, Si-Qing Chen, Wayne Xiong
Hallucination, a phenomenon where large language models (LLMs) produce output that is factually incorrect or unrelated to the input, is a major challenge for LLM applications that require accuracy and dependability. In this paper, we introduce a reliable and high-speed production system aimed at detecting and rectifying the hallucination issue within LLMs. Our system encompasses named entity recognition (NER), natural language inference (NLI), span-based detection (SBD), and an intricate decision tree-based process to reliably detect a wide range of hallucinations in LLM responses. Furthermore, our team has crafted a rewriting mechanism that maintains an optimal mix of precision, response time, and cost-effectiveness. We detail the core elements of our framework and underscore the paramount challenges tied to response time, availability, and performance metrics, which are crucial for real-world deployment of these technologies. Our extensive evaluation, utilizing offline data and live production traffic, confirms the efficacy of our proposed framework and service.
Read more7/23/2024
0
Not My Voice! A Taxonomy of Ethical and Safety Harms of Speech Generators
Wiebke Hutiri, Oresiti Papakyriakopoulos, Alice Xiang
The rapid and wide-scale adoption of AI to generate human speech poses a range of significant ethical and safety risks to society that need to be addressed. For example, a growing number of speech generation incidents are associated with swatting attacks in the United States, where anonymous perpetrators create synthetic voices that call police officers to close down schools and hospitals, or to violently gain access to innocent citizens' homes. Incidents like this demonstrate that multimodal generative AI risks and harms do not exist in isolation, but arise from the interactions of multiple stakeholders and technical AI systems. In this paper we analyse speech generation incidents to study how patterns of specific harms arise. We find that specific harms can be categorised according to the exposure of affected individuals, that is to say whether they are a subject of, interact with, suffer due to, or are excluded from speech generation systems. Similarly, specific harms are also a consequence of the motives of the creators and deployers of the systems. Based on these insights we propose a conceptual framework for modelling pathways to ethical and safety harms of AI, which we use to develop a taxonomy of harms of speech generators. Our relational approach captures the complexity of risks and harms in sociotechnical AI systems, and yields a taxonomy that can support appropriate policy interventions and decision making for the responsible development and release of speech generation models.
Read more5/16/2024