Emerging Reliance Behaviors in Human-AI Text Generation: Hallucinations, Data Quality Assessment, and Cognitive Forcing Functions
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines emerging reliance behaviors in human-AI text generation, including hallucinations, data quality assessment, and cognitive forcing functions
- Provides insights into the challenges and potential solutions for ensuring reliable and trustworthy AI-generated text
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores how humans are interacting with and relying on AI systems for text generation, and the issues that can arise as a result. One key issue is hallucinations, where the AI system generates plausible-sounding but factually incorrect text. The researchers also examine how humans assess the quality of the data used to train these AI models, and how "cognitive forcing functions" - techniques that compel users to think critically about the AI's outputs - can help mitigate over-reliance on the AI.
The goal is to understand the complex human-AI dynamics at play and develop strategies to ensure AI-generated text remains reliable and trustworthy. By addressing these challenges, the research aims to improve the safety and transparency of AI text generation systems as they become more prevalent in our lives.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates emerging reliance behaviors that arise as humans interact with AI text generation systems. A key focus is on the problem of hallucinations, where the AI produces plausible-sounding but factually incorrect text.
The researchers conducted experiments to understand how humans assess the quality of the data used to train these AI models, and how "cognitive forcing functions" - such as prompting users to explain their reasoning - can help mitigate over-reliance on AI outputs. The results provide insights into the complex interplay between humans and AI in text generation tasks, and strategies for promoting reliable and trustworthy AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable exploration of the challenges surrounding human-AI interaction in text generation, particularly the issue of hallucinations and the need for techniques to help users think critically about AI outputs. However, the research is limited to specific experimental setups, and additional work is needed to understand how these dynamics play out in real-world, large-scale deployments of AI text generation.
Further research could also investigate the broader implications of human reliance on AI for text generation, such as the potential for the spread of misinformation or the impact on human cognition and decision-making. Nonetheless, this paper is an important contribution to the ongoing efforts to ensure the safe and responsible development of AI technologies.
Conclusion
This research paper provides valuable insights into the emerging reliance behaviors that arise as humans interact with AI text generation systems. By examining issues like hallucinations, data quality assessment, and cognitive forcing functions, the authors shed light on the complex challenges that must be addressed to ensure the reliability and trustworthiness of AI-generated text. As AI continues to be integrated into our lives, this work highlights the importance of developing strategies to promote critical thinking and maintain human agency in the face of increasingly capable, but potentially fallible, AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Emerging Reliance Behaviors in Human-AI Text Generation: Hallucinations, Data Quality Assessment, and Cognitive Forcing Functions
Zahra Ashktorab, Qian Pan, Werner Geyer, Michael Desmond, Marina Danilevsky, James M. Johnson, Casey Dugan, Michelle Bachman
In this paper, we investigate the impact of hallucinations and cognitive forcing functions in human-AI collaborative text generation tasks, focusing on the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to assist in generating high-quality conversational data. LLMs require data for fine-tuning, a crucial step in enhancing their performance. In the context of conversational customer support, the data takes the form of a conversation between a human customer and an agent and can be generated with an AI assistant. In our inquiry, involving 11 users who each completed 8 tasks, resulting in a total of 88 tasks, we found that the presence of hallucinations negatively impacts the quality of data. We also find that, although the cognitive forcing function does not always mitigate the detrimental effects of hallucinations on data quality, the presence of cognitive forcing functions and hallucinations together impacts data quality and influences how users leverage the AI responses presented to them. Our analysis of user behavior reveals distinct patterns of reliance on AI-generated responses, highlighting the importance of managing hallucinations in AI-generated content within conversational AI contexts.
Read more9/16/2024
1
On Early Detection of Hallucinations in Factual Question Answering
Ben Snyder, Marius Moisescu, Muhammad Bilal Zafar
While large language models (LLMs) have taken great strides towards helping humans with a plethora of tasks, hallucinations remain a major impediment towards gaining user trust. The fluency and coherence of model generations even when hallucinating makes detection a difficult task. In this work, we explore if the artifacts associated with the model generations can provide hints that the generation will contain hallucinations. Specifically, we probe LLMs at 1) the inputs via Integrated Gradients based token attribution, 2) the outputs via the Softmax probabilities, and 3) the internal state via self-attention and fully-connected layer activations for signs of hallucinations on open-ended question answering tasks. Our results show that the distributions of these artifacts tend to differ between hallucinated and non-hallucinated generations. Building on this insight, we train binary classifiers that use these artifacts as input features to classify model generations into hallucinations and non-hallucinations. These hallucination classifiers achieve up to $0.80$ AUROC. We also show that tokens preceding a hallucination can already predict the subsequent hallucination even before it occurs.
Read more8/23/2024
📊
0
Code Hallucination
Mirza Masfiqur Rahman, Ashish Kundu
Generative models such as large language models are extensively used as code copilots and for whole program generation. However, the programs they generate often have questionable correctness, authenticity and reliability in terms of integration as they might not follow the user requirements, provide incorrect and/or nonsensical outputs, or even contain semantic/syntactic errors - overall known as LLM hallucination. In this work, we present several types of code hallucination. We have generated such hallucinated code manually using large language models. We also present a technique - HallTrigger, in order to demonstrate efficient ways of generating arbitrary code hallucination. Our method leverages 3 different dynamic attributes of LLMs to craft prompts that can successfully trigger hallucinations from models without the need to access model architecture or parameters. Results from popular blackbox models suggest that HallTrigger is indeed effective and the pervasive LLM hallucination have sheer impact on software development.
Read more7/9/2024
💬
0
Towards Reliable Medical Question Answering: Techniques and Challenges in Mitigating Hallucinations in Language Models
Duy Khoa Pham, Bao Quoc Vo
The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has significantly impacted various domains, including healthcare and biomedicine. However, the phenomenon of hallucination, where LLMs generate outputs that deviate from factual accuracy or context, poses a critical challenge, especially in high-stakes domains. This paper conducts a scoping study of existing techniques for mitigating hallucinations in knowledge-based task in general and especially for medical domains. Key methods covered in the paper include Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based techniques, iterative feedback loops, supervised fine-tuning, and prompt engineering. These techniques, while promising in general contexts, require further adaptation and optimization for the medical domain due to its unique demands for up-to-date, specialized knowledge and strict adherence to medical guidelines. Addressing these challenges is crucial for developing trustworthy AI systems that enhance clinical decision-making and patient safety as well as accuracy of biomedical scientific research.
Read more8/27/2024