CATBench: A Compiler Autotuning Benchmarking Suite for Black-box Optimization
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Introduces CATBench, a new compiler autotuning benchmarking suite for black-box optimization
- Aims to provide a comprehensive set of benchmarks to evaluate the performance of compiler autotuning techniques
- Includes a diverse set of program kernels, compilation targets, and optimization spaces
- Designed to help researchers and practitioners assess the effectiveness of their autotuning approaches
Plain English Explanation
CATBench is a new library that provides a collection of benchmarks for evaluating compiler autotuning techniques. Compiler autotuning is the process of automatically optimizing the performance of software programs by adjusting the compiler's optimization settings. This is an important area of research, as it can lead to significant performance improvements without requiring manual intervention.
The CATBench suite includes a variety of program kernels, or small building blocks of code, that represent different types of computational workloads. It also covers a range of compilation targets, such as different hardware architectures, and optimization spaces, which are the set of possible compiler settings that can be adjusted. By providing this diverse set of benchmarks, CATBench aims to help researchers and practitioners assess the effectiveness of their autotuning approaches in a comprehensive and rigorous manner.
Technical Explanation
The CATBench: A Compiler Autotuning Benchmarking Suite for Black-box Optimization paper introduces a new benchmark suite for evaluating compiler autotuning techniques. The authors designed CATBench to address the lack of a standardized set of benchmarks for this important research area.
The suite includes a diverse set of program kernels, covering various computational workloads, such as linear algebra, image processing, and stencil computations. These kernels are compiled for different hardware architectures, including CPUs and GPUs, and the authors have defined a range of optimization spaces that can be explored by autotuning techniques.
To evaluate the performance of autotuning approaches, the authors propose several metrics, including the best-found performance, the rate of performance improvement, and the cumulative regret, which measures the difference between the best-found performance and the optimal performance. These metrics are designed to capture different aspects of the autotuning process and provide a comprehensive assessment of the techniques being evaluated.
The authors also discuss the importance of ensuring that the benchmarks are representative of real-world applications and that the optimization spaces are sufficiently challenging to test the limits of autotuning techniques. They highlight the need for further research in areas such as high-dimensional Bayesian optimization, locally adaptive Bayesian optimization, and pseudo-Bayesian optimization, which can be valuable for addressing the challenges posed by compiler autotuning.
Critical Analysis
The CATBench suite represents a significant step forward in providing a standardized and comprehensive set of benchmarks for compiler autotuning research. By including a diverse set of program kernels, compilation targets, and optimization spaces, the authors have created a platform that can challenge the capabilities of various autotuning techniques.
However, the authors acknowledge that the benchmarks may not fully capture the complexity of real-world applications, and they encourage further research to address this limitation. Additionally, the authors note that the optimization spaces defined in CATBench may not be sufficiently challenging for more advanced autotuning techniques, and they suggest the need for continued efforts to push the boundaries of what is possible in this domain.
One potential area for further research is the development of more efficient and adaptive optimization strategies, such as the Adaptive Bayesian Optimization for High-Precision Motion Systems approach. By incorporating techniques that can better navigate high-dimensional optimization spaces and adapt to the specific characteristics of the problem at hand, researchers may be able to achieve even greater performance improvements through compiler autotuning.
Conclusion
The CATBench suite represents a valuable contribution to the field of compiler autotuning research. By providing a standardized and comprehensive set of benchmarks, the authors have created a platform that can help researchers and practitioners assess the effectiveness of their autotuning techniques in a rigorous and systematic manner. The insights gained from using CATBench can lead to the development of more powerful and efficient compiler optimization strategies, with the potential to unlock significant performance improvements in a wide range of software applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
CATBench: A Compiler Autotuning Benchmarking Suite for Black-box Optimization
Jacob O. T{o}rring, Carl Hvarfner, Luigi Nardi, Magnus Sjalander
Bayesian optimization is a powerful method for automating tuning of compilers. The complex landscape of autotuning provides a myriad of rarely considered structural challenges for black-box optimizers, and the lack of standardized benchmarks has limited the study of Bayesian optimization within the domain. To address this, we present CATBench, a comprehensive benchmarking suite that captures the complexities of compiler autotuning, ranging from discrete, conditional, and permutation parameter types to known and unknown binary constraints, as well as both multi-fidelity and multi-objective evaluations. The benchmarks in CATBench span a range of machine learning-oriented computations, from tensor algebra to image processing and clustering, and uses state-of-the-art compilers, such as TACO and RISE/ELEVATE. CATBench offers a unified interface for evaluating Bayesian optimization algorithms, promoting reproducibility and innovation through an easy-to-use, fully containerized setup of both surrogate and real-world compiler optimization tasks. We validate CATBench on several state-of-the-art algorithms, revealing their strengths and weaknesses and demonstrating the suite's potential for advancing both Bayesian optimization and compiler autotuning research.
Read more6/27/2024
🏋️
0
CTBENCH: A Library and Benchmark for Certified Training
Yuhao Mao, Stefan Balauca, Martin Vechev
Training certifiably robust neural networks is an important but challenging task. While many algorithms for (deterministic) certified training have been proposed, they are often evaluated on different training schedules, certification methods, and systematically under-tuned hyperparameters, making it difficult to compare their performance. To address this challenge, we introduce CTBENCH, a unified library and a high-quality benchmark for certified training that evaluates all algorithms under fair settings and systematically tuned hyperparameters. We show that (1) almost all algorithms in CTBENCH surpass the corresponding reported performance in literature in the magnitude of algorithmic improvements, thus establishing new state-of-the-art, and (2) the claimed advantage of recent algorithms drops significantly when we enhance the outdated baselines with a fair training schedule, a fair certification method and well-tuned hyperparameters. Based on CTBENCH, we provide new insights into the current state of certified training and suggest future research directions. We are confident that CTBENCH will serve as a benchmark and testbed for future research in certified training.
Read more6/10/2024
0
A survey and benchmark of high-dimensional Bayesian optimization of discrete sequences
Miguel Gonz'alez-Duque, Richard Michael, Simon Bartels, Yevgen Zainchkovskyy, S{o}ren Hauberg, Wouter Boomsma
Optimizing discrete black-box functions is key in several domains, e.g. protein engineering and drug design. Due to the lack of gradient information and the need for sample efficiency, Bayesian optimization is an ideal candidate for these tasks. Several methods for high-dimensional continuous and categorical Bayesian optimization have been proposed recently. However, our survey of the field reveals highly heterogeneous experimental set-ups across methods and technical barriers for the replicability and application of published algorithms to real-world tasks. To address these issues, we develop a unified framework to test a vast array of high-dimensional Bayesian optimization methods and a collection of standardized black-box functions representing real-world application domains in chemistry and biology. These two components of the benchmark are each supported by flexible, scalable, and easily extendable software libraries (poli and poli-baselines), allowing practitioners to readily incorporate new optimization objectives or discrete optimizers. Project website: https://machinelearninglifescience.github.io/hdbo_benchmark
Read more6/10/2024
🛠️
0
LABCAT: Locally adaptive Bayesian optimization using principal-component-aligned trust regions
E. Visser, C. E. van Daalen, J. C. Schoeman
Bayesian optimization (BO) is a popular method for optimizing expensive black-box functions. BO has several well-documented shortcomings, including computational slowdown with longer optimization runs, poor suitability for non-stationary or ill-conditioned objective functions, and poor convergence characteristics. Several algorithms have been proposed that incorporate local strategies, such as trust regions, into BO to mitigate these limitations; however, none address all of them satisfactorily. To address these shortcomings, we propose the LABCAT algorithm, which extends trust-region-based BO by adding a rotation aligning the trust region with the weighted principal components and an adaptive rescaling strategy based on the length-scales of a local Gaussian process surrogate model with automatic relevance determination. Through extensive numerical experiments using a set of synthetic test functions and the well-known COCO benchmarking software, we show that the LABCAT algorithm outperforms several state-of-the-art BO and other black-box optimization algorithms.
Read more6/18/2024