Causal Concept Embedding Models: Beyond Causal Opacity in Deep Learning

Read original: arXiv:2405.16507 - Published 5/29/2024 by Gabriele Dominici, Pietro Barbiero, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Alberto Termine, Martin Gjoreski, Giuseppe Marra, Marc Langheinrich
Total Score

0

Causal Concept Embedding Models: Beyond Causal Opacity in Deep Learning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces Causal Concept Embedding (CCE) models, a new approach to improving the interpretability of deep learning models beyond traditional "black box" methods.
  • CCE models aim to learn disentangled representations that are grounded in causal concepts, making the model's reasoning more transparent and explainable.
  • The paper explores the advantages of CCE models over existing techniques, and presents experimental results demonstrating their potential for enhancing causal understanding in deep learning.

Plain English Explanation

Causal Concept Embedding (CCE) models are a new way to make deep learning models more transparent and understandable. Traditional deep learning models can be like black boxes - it's hard to see how they make decisions. CCE models try to change that by learning representations that are directly tied to the underlying causal factors driving the model's predictions.

The idea is that by grounding the model's internal representations in causal concepts, we can better understand the reasoning behind its outputs. This could help address the "causal opacity" problem that often plagues deep learning, where the model's decision-making process is obscured.

For example, imagine a deep learning model trained to diagnose diseases from medical images. A CCE model might learn representations that correspond to specific anatomical features or disease markers, rather than just picking up on low-level pixel patterns. This would make it easier to interpret why the model is making a particular diagnosis.

Causal-centric approaches like CCE aim to inject more causal understanding into deep learning, going beyond just predicting correlations. This could lead to models that are more robust, generalizable, and aligned with human reasoning.

Technical Explanation

The key innovation of CCE models is the introduction of a "causal concept layer" that sits between the model's input and its final output. This layer is designed to learn disentangled representations that map directly to underlying causal factors in the data.

To achieve this, the CCE model is trained using a multi-task objective. In addition to the primary task (e.g., image classification), the model must also predict the values of certain causal concepts. This encourages the model to discover representations that capture the causal structure of the problem, rather than just memorizing patterns in the training data.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of CCE models through experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets. They show that CCE models can outperform standard deep learning baselines in terms of predictive performance, while also providing more interpretable and causally-grounded explanations for their outputs.

Transparency challenges in policy evaluation with causal ML are another area where CCE models could be beneficial. By making the causal reasoning of deep learning models more explicit, CCE could help address issues around fairness, robustness, and accountability in high-stakes applications.

Critical Analysis

The CCE approach represents an important step forward in the quest for more interpretable and causally-aware deep learning models. By explicitly modeling causal concepts, the authors demonstrate the potential to enhance the transparency and explainability of these powerful AI systems.

That said, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. For instance, the authors note that the causal concept representations learned by CCE models may still be difficult to interpret, and that more work is needed to develop effective visualization and exploration tools.

Advancing explainable AI through causal analysis is another relevant consideration. While CCE models take a step in this direction, there are still open challenges in terms of scaling causal reasoning to large-scale deep learning architectures.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential issues around the reliability and robustness of causal concept representations, or how they might be affected by dataset bias or distributional shift. Understanding concept activation vectors in deep learning could provide useful insights in this regard.

Conclusion

The Causal Concept Embedding (CCE) model proposed in this paper represents a promising approach for enhancing the interpretability and causal understanding of deep learning systems. By learning representations that are grounded in underlying causal factors, CCE models have the potential to make the reasoning behind their outputs more transparent and accessible to human users.

As the field of AI continues to grapple with the "black box" problem, CCE and other causal-centric techniques could play an important role in developing more explainable, trustworthy, and accountable deep learning models. While further research is needed to address the limitations identified in this paper, the core ideas behind CCE represent an important step forward in the quest for a new generation of interpretable AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Causal Concept Embedding Models: Beyond Causal Opacity in Deep Learning
Total Score

0

Causal Concept Embedding Models: Beyond Causal Opacity in Deep Learning

Gabriele Dominici, Pietro Barbiero, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Alberto Termine, Martin Gjoreski, Giuseppe Marra, Marc Langheinrich

Causal opacity denotes the difficulty in understanding the hidden causal structure underlying a deep neural network's (DNN) reasoning. This leads to the inability to rely on and verify state-of-the-art DNN-based systems especially in high-stakes scenarios. For this reason, causal opacity represents a key open challenge at the intersection of deep learning, interpretability, and causality. This work addresses this gap by introducing Causal Concept Embedding Models (Causal CEMs), a class of interpretable models whose decision-making process is causally transparent by design. The results of our experiments show that Causal CEMs can: (i) match the generalization performance of causally-opaque models, (ii) support the analysis of interventional and counterfactual scenarios, thereby improving the model's causal interpretability and supporting the effective verification of its reliability and fairness, and (iii) enable human-in-the-loop corrections to mispredicted intermediate reasoning steps, boosting not just downstream accuracy after corrections but also accuracy of the explanation provided for a specific instance.

Read more

5/29/2024

Interpreting Low-level Vision Models with Causal Effect Maps
Total Score

0

Interpreting Low-level Vision Models with Causal Effect Maps

Jinfan Hu, Jinjin Gu, Shiyao Yu, Fanghua Yu, Zheyuan Li, Zhiyuan You, Chaochao Lu, Chao Dong

Deep neural networks have significantly improved the performance of low-level vision tasks but also increased the difficulty of interpretability. A deep understanding of deep models is beneficial for both network design and practical reliability. To take up this challenge, we introduce causality theory to interpret low-level vision models and propose a model-/task-agnostic method called Causal Effect Map (CEM). With CEM, we can visualize and quantify the input-output relationships on either positive or negative effects. After analyzing various low-level vision tasks with CEM, we have reached several interesting insights, such as: (1) Using more information of input images (e.g., larger receptive field) does NOT always yield positive outcomes. (2) Attempting to incorporate mechanisms with a global receptive field (e.g., channel attention) into image denoising may prove futile. (3) Integrating multiple tasks to train a general model could encourage the network to prioritize local information over global context. Based on the causal effect theory, the proposed diagnostic tool can refresh our common knowledge and bring a deeper understanding of low-level vision models. Codes are available at https://github.com/J-FHu/CEM.

Read more

7/30/2024

Evidential Concept Embedding Models: Towards Reliable Concept Explanations for Skin Disease Diagnosis
Total Score

0

Evidential Concept Embedding Models: Towards Reliable Concept Explanations for Skin Disease Diagnosis

Yibo Gao, Zheyao Gao, Xin Gao, Yuanye Liu, Bomin Wang, Xiahai Zhuang

Due to the high stakes in medical decision-making, there is a compelling demand for interpretable deep learning methods in medical image analysis. Concept Bottleneck Models (CBM) have emerged as an active interpretable framework incorporating human-interpretable concepts into decision-making. However, their concept predictions may lack reliability when applied to clinical diagnosis, impeding concept explanations' quality. To address this, we propose an evidential Concept Embedding Model (evi-CEM), which employs evidential learning to model the concept uncertainty. Additionally, we offer to leverage the concept uncertainty to rectify concept misalignments that arise when training CBMs using vision-language models without complete concept supervision. With the proposed methods, we can enhance concept explanations' reliability for both supervised and label-efficient settings. Furthermore, we introduce concept uncertainty for effective test-time intervention. Our evaluation demonstrates that evi-CEM achieves superior performance in terms of concept prediction, and the proposed concept rectification effectively mitigates concept misalignments for label-efficient training. Our code is available at https://github.com/obiyoag/evi-CEM.

Read more

6/28/2024

Structure Your Data: Towards Semantic Graph Counterfactuals
Total Score

0

Structure Your Data: Towards Semantic Graph Counterfactuals

Angeliki Dimitriou, Maria Lymperaiou, Giorgos Filandrianos, Konstantinos Thomas, Giorgos Stamou

Counterfactual explanations (CEs) based on concepts are explanations that consider alternative scenarios to understand which high-level semantic features contributed to particular model predictions. In this work, we propose CEs based on the semantic graphs accompanying input data to achieve more descriptive, accurate, and human-aligned explanations. Building upon state-of-the-art (SoTA) conceptual attempts, we adopt a model-agnostic edit-based approach and introduce leveraging GNNs for efficient Graph Edit Distance (GED) computation. With a focus on the visual domain, we represent images as scene graphs and obtain their GNN embeddings to bypass solving the NP-hard graph similarity problem for all input pairs, an integral part of the CE computation process. We apply our method to benchmark and real-world datasets with varying difficulty and availability of semantic annotations. Testing on diverse classifiers, we find that our CEs outperform previous SoTA explanation models based on semantics, including both white and black-box as well as conceptual and pixel-level approaches. Their superiority is proven quantitatively and qualitatively, as validated by human subjects, highlighting the significance of leveraging semantic edges in the presence of intricate relationships. Our model-agnostic graph-based approach is widely applicable and easily extensible, producing actionable explanations across different contexts.

Read more

7/23/2024