Structure Your Data: Towards Semantic Graph Counterfactuals
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a method for generating semantic graph counterfactuals to explain the behavior of machine learning models on graph-structured data.
- Counterfactuals are used to understand why a model made a particular prediction by identifying the minimal changes to the input that would lead to a different outcome.
- The authors develop an approach to generate counterfactuals that preserve the semantic meaning of the underlying graph, rather than just modifying the graph structure.
Plain English Explanation
When machine learning models are used to make decisions on graph-structured data, it can be difficult to understand how the model arrived at a particular prediction. Counterfactual explanations can help address this by identifying the minimal changes to the input that would lead to a different output from the model.
However, previous approaches to generating counterfactuals for graph data have focused solely on modifying the structure of the graph, without considering the semantic meaning of the underlying concepts and relationships. This paper proposes a new method that generates counterfactuals that preserve the semantic meaning of the graph, making the explanations more meaningful and interpretable.
The key idea is to use a graph neural network to encode the input graph into a semantic representation, and then use an optimization-based approach to find the minimal perturbations to this representation that would lead to a different model prediction. By constraining the perturbations to preserve the semantic structure, the resulting counterfactuals are more aligned with human intuitions about the underlying concepts and relationships.
Technical Explanation
The authors develop a framework for generating semantic graph counterfactuals to explain the predictions of machine learning models on graph-structured data. The core components of their approach are:
- Graph Encoder: A graph neural network is used to encode the input graph into a semantic representation that captures the underlying concepts and relationships.
- Counterfactual Generator: An optimization-based approach is used to find the minimal perturbations to the semantic representation that would lead to a different model prediction. These perturbations are constrained to preserve the semantic structure of the graph.
- Graph Decoder: The perturbed semantic representation is then decoded back into a counterfactual graph that can be used to explain the model's prediction.
The authors evaluate their approach on several benchmark graph datasets and show that the generated counterfactuals are more semantically meaningful and aligned with human intuitions compared to previous structure-only approaches.
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge several limitations of their work:
- The method relies on the availability of a pre-trained graph neural network encoder, which may not always be the case in practice.
- The optimization-based approach for generating counterfactuals can be computationally expensive, especially for larger graphs.
- The evaluation focuses on relatively simple graph datasets, and the performance may differ on more complex real-world graphs.
Additionally, a potential concern is that the focus on preserving semantic structure may lead to counterfactuals that are less diverse or informative than those generated by structure-only approaches. It would be interesting to see a more thorough comparative analysis of the trade-offs between semantic and structural fidelity in the generated counterfactuals.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach for generating semantic graph counterfactuals, which can provide more meaningful and interpretable explanations for the predictions of machine learning models on graph-structured data. By preserving the semantic structure of the underlying concepts and relationships, the generated counterfactuals are better aligned with human intuitions and can help users better understand the model's decision-making process. While the method has some limitations, it represents an important step towards developing more interpretable AI systems for graph-based applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Structure Your Data: Towards Semantic Graph Counterfactuals
Angeliki Dimitriou, Maria Lymperaiou, Giorgos Filandrianos, Konstantinos Thomas, Giorgos Stamou
Counterfactual explanations (CEs) based on concepts are explanations that consider alternative scenarios to understand which high-level semantic features contributed to particular model predictions. In this work, we propose CEs based on the semantic graphs accompanying input data to achieve more descriptive, accurate, and human-aligned explanations. Building upon state-of-the-art (SoTA) conceptual attempts, we adopt a model-agnostic edit-based approach and introduce leveraging GNNs for efficient Graph Edit Distance (GED) computation. With a focus on the visual domain, we represent images as scene graphs and obtain their GNN embeddings to bypass solving the NP-hard graph similarity problem for all input pairs, an integral part of the CE computation process. We apply our method to benchmark and real-world datasets with varying difficulty and availability of semantic annotations. Testing on diverse classifiers, we find that our CEs outperform previous SoTA explanation models based on semantics, including both white and black-box as well as conceptual and pixel-level approaches. Their superiority is proven quantitatively and qualitatively, as validated by human subjects, highlighting the significance of leveraging semantic edges in the presence of intricate relationships. Our model-agnostic graph-based approach is widely applicable and easily extensible, producing actionable explanations across different contexts.
Read more7/23/2024
0
Graph Edits for Counterfactual Explanations: A comparative study
Angeliki Dimitriou, Nikolaos Chaidos, Maria Lymperaiou, Giorgos Stamou
Counterfactuals have been established as a popular explainability technique which leverages a set of minimal edits to alter the prediction of a classifier. When considering conceptual counterfactuals on images, the edits requested should correspond to salient concepts present in the input data. At the same time, conceptual distances are defined by knowledge graphs, ensuring the optimality of conceptual edits. In this work, we extend previous endeavors on graph edits as counterfactual explanations by conducting a comparative study which encompasses both supervised and unsupervised Graph Neural Network (GNN) approaches. To this end, we pose the following significant research question: should we represent input data as graphs, which is the optimal GNN approach in terms of performance and time efficiency to generate minimal and meaningful counterfactual explanations for black-box image classifiers?
Read more4/19/2024
👁️
0
A Survey on Graph Counterfactual Explanations: Definitions, Methods, Evaluation, and Research Challenges
Mario Alfonso Prado-Romero, Bardh Prenkaj, Giovanni Stilo, Fosca Giannotti
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) perform well in community detection and molecule classification. Counterfactual Explanations (CE) provide counter-examples to overcome the transparency limitations of black-box models. Due to the growing attention in graph learning, we focus on the concepts of CE for GNNs. We analysed the SoA to provide a taxonomy, a uniform notation, and the benchmarking datasets and evaluation metrics. We discuss fourteen methods, their evaluation protocols, twenty-two datasets, and nineteen metrics. We integrated the majority of methods into the GRETEL library to conduct an empirical evaluation to understand their strengths and pitfalls. We highlight open challenges and future work.
Read more6/12/2024
🚀
0
Global Concept Explanations for Graphs by Contrastive Learning
Jonas Teufel, Pascal Friederich
Beyond improving trust and validating model fairness, xAI practices also have the potential to recover valuable scientific insights in application domains where little to no prior human intuition exists. To that end, we propose a method to extract global concept explanations from the predictions of graph neural networks to develop a deeper understanding of the tasks underlying structure-property relationships. We identify concept explanations as dense clusters in the self-explaining Megan models subgraph latent space. For each concept, we optimize a representative prototype graph and optionally use GPT-4 to provide hypotheses about why each structure has a certain effect on the prediction. We conduct computational experiments on synthetic and real-world graph property prediction tasks. For the synthetic tasks we find that our method correctly reproduces the structural rules by which they were created. For real-world molecular property regression and classification tasks, we find that our method rediscovers established rules of thumb. More specifically, our results for molecular mutagenicity prediction indicate more fine-grained resolution of structural details than existing explainability methods, consistent with previous results from chemistry literature. Overall, our results show promising capability to extract the underlying structure-property relationships for complex graph property prediction tasks.
Read more4/26/2024