Causal Fair Machine Learning via Rank-Preserving Interventional Distributions

Overview

• Defines fairness in machine learning models as treating equal individuals equally and unequal individuals unequally
• Introduces a concept of a "fictitious, normatively desired (FiND) world" where protected attributes have no causal effect on the target
• Proposes a method to estimate interventional distributions that preserve rank order and mitigate unfairness

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses how to design machine learning (ML) models that make fair decisions. The key idea is that a decision is fair if it treats equal individuals equally and unequal individuals unequally. To implement this, the paper introduces the concept of a "fictitious, normatively desired (FiND) world" - a hypothetical scenario where protected attributes like race or gender have no direct or indirect causal influence on the outcome being predicted.

The paper then proposes a method to estimate what the data would look like in this FiND world, using a technique called "rank-preserving interventional distributions." This allows the researchers to identify the individuals who are most discriminated against and mitigate the unfairness in the ML model's predictions. The method is evaluated through simulations and experiments on real-world data, and compared to a different approach called fairadapt that uses quantile regression forests.

The key insight is that by explicitly modeling the causal relationships between the protected attributes, other features, and the target variable, we can define a fair baseline ("FiND world") and then adjust the model to match this baseline, effectively reducing discrimination.

Technical Explanation

The paper starts by defining fairness in automated decision-making systems as treating equal individuals equally and unequal individuals unequally. To implement this, the authors propose a framework that involves defining a "fictitious, normatively desired (FiND) world" - a hypothetical scenario where protected attributes like race or gender have no direct or indirect causal effect on the target variable.

The authors then introduce a method to estimate rank-preserving interventional distributions that represent what the data would look like in this FiND world. This involves a two-step process: first, estimating the causal relationships between the features and the target using techniques like structural equation modeling; and second, applying a warping method to transform the observed data to match the interventional distributions in the FiND world.

The authors evaluate their method through simulations and experiments on real-world data, and compare it to fairadapt, a different approach for mitigating unfairness that uses quantile regression forests. The results show that their warping method effectively identifies the most discriminated individuals and reduces unfairness in the ML model's predictions.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and well-designed approach for mitigating unfairness in automated decision-making systems. The key strength of the method is its explicit consideration of causal relationships, which allows for a more principled definition of fairness and a systematic way to adjust the model to achieve it.

However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the method assumes that the causal relationships can be accurately estimated, which may be challenging in practice, especially when dealing with complex, high-dimensional datasets. Additionally, the paper does not address the potential trade-offs between fairness and other desirable properties, such as accuracy or interpretability, which are important considerations in real-world applications.

Further research could explore ways to relax the assumptions of the method, such as by incorporating uncertainty about the causal structure or allowing for more flexible forms of interventions. Investigations into the practical feasibility and scalability of the approach, as well as its robustness to different types of dataset shifts or model architectures, would also be valuable.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach for designing machine learning models that mitigate unfairness in automated decision-making systems. By defining fairness in terms of treating equal individuals equally and unequal individuals unequally, and introducing the concept of a "fictitious, normatively desired (FiND) world," the authors propose a systematic method for identifying and addressing discrimination in ML models.

The key contribution of this work is the integration of causal thinking into the problem of algorithmic fairness, which allows for a more principled definition of fairness and a systematic way to adjust the model to achieve it. While the method has some limitations, it represents an important step forward in the growing field of fair machine learning, with potential implications for a wide range of applications where automated decisions impact people's lives.