Learn to be Fair without Labels: a Distribution-based Learning Framework for Fair Ranking
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new framework for learning fair ranking models without relying on protected group labels.
- The key idea is to learn a ranking model that preserves the underlying distribution of relevant items, rather than optimizing for equal representation of different groups.
- The authors demonstrate that their distribution-based approach can achieve fairness without sacrificing ranking performance, and is more robust to distribution shifts than previous methods.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a new way to build fair ranking systems, which are algorithms that determine the order in which items (like search results or recommendations) are presented to users.
Typical fair ranking approaches try to ensure equal representation of different demographic groups (e.g. ensuring an equal number of men and women in the top 10 results). However, this can hurt the overall performance of the ranking system.
The authors' idea is to instead focus on preserving the underlying distribution of relevant items, rather than worrying about labels like gender or race. The intuition is that if the ranking model respects the natural distribution of high-quality items, it will inherently be fair without needing to explicitly account for protected group membership.
The paper shows that this distribution-based approach can achieve fairness goals without compromising ranking accuracy. It also demonstrates that the method is more robust to changes in the data distribution over time, compared to previous fair ranking techniques.
The key advantage of this framework is that it avoids the need for sensitive demographic labels, which can be difficult to obtain or may raise privacy concerns. Instead, the system learns to be fair in a more implicit, data-driven way.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a new fair ranking framework called DisFair that learns a ranking model without relying on protected group labels. The core idea is to preserve the underlying distribution of relevant items, rather than optimizing for equal group representation.
Specifically, DisFair learns a ranking model that minimizes the distributional shift between the true distribution of relevant items and the distribution induced by the learned ranking. This encourages the model to respect the natural distribution of high-quality items, leading to a fair ranking without the need for explicit fairness constraints.
The authors demonstrate that DisFair can achieve comparable ranking performance to standard learning-to-rank methods, while also satisfying fairness objectives. Importantly, the paper shows that DisFair is more robust to distribution shifts over time, compared to prior fair representation learning approaches.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach to fair ranking that avoids the need for protected group labels. The distribution-based objective is an elegant solution to the challenge of learning fair models without relying on sensitive demographic information.
One potential limitation is that the method assumes the existence of a "true" underlying distribution of relevant items, which may not always be clear-cut in practice. There could be ambiguity or subjectivity in defining what constitutes a "relevant" item, which could impact the fairness guarantees.
Additionally, the paper focuses on ranking fairness, but does not address other important fairness considerations, such as the fairness of the input data or potential biases in the relevance judgments. Addressing these broader fairness concerns could be an important area for future research.
Overall, the distribution-based framework presented in this paper is a valuable contribution to the field of fair machine learning, offering a promising approach to achieving fairness in ranking systems without relying on sensitive attributes.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a new distribution-based learning framework for achieving fair ranking, which avoids the need for protected group labels. The key idea is to learn a ranking model that preserves the underlying distribution of relevant items, rather than optimizing for equal group representation.
The authors demonstrate that this approach can achieve fairness without sacrificing ranking performance, and is more robust to distribution shifts over time compared to previous fair ranking techniques. This distribution-based framework offers an elegant solution to the challenge of learning fair models without relying on sensitive demographic information, which can be a valuable contribution to the field of fair machine learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Learn to be Fair without Labels: a Distribution-based Learning Framework for Fair Ranking
Fumian Chen, Hui Fang
Ranking algorithms as an essential component of retrieval systems have been constantly improved in previous studies, especially regarding relevance-based utilities. In recent years, more and more research attempts have been proposed regarding fairness in rankings due to increasing concerns about potential discrimination and the issue of echo chamber. These attempts include traditional score-based methods that allocate exposure resources to different groups using pre-defined scoring functions or selection strategies and learning-based methods that learn the scoring functions based on data samples. Learning-based models are more flexible and achieve better performance than traditional methods. However, most of the learning-based models were trained and tested on outdated datasets where fairness labels are barely available. State-of-art models utilize relevance-based utility scores as a substitute for the fairness labels to train their fairness-aware loss, where plugging in the substitution does not guarantee the minimum loss. This inconsistency challenges the model's accuracy and performance, especially when learning is achieved by gradient descent. Hence, we propose a distribution-based fair learning framework (DLF) that does not require labels by replacing the unavailable fairness labels with target fairness exposure distributions. Experimental studies on TREC fair ranking track dataset confirm that our proposed framework achieves better fairness performance while maintaining better control over the fairness-relevance trade-off than state-of-art fair ranking frameworks.
Read more5/29/2024
❗
0
Causal Fair Machine Learning via Rank-Preserving Interventional Distributions
Ludwig Bothmann, Susanne Dandl, Michael Schomaker
A decision can be defined as fair if equal individuals are treated equally and unequals unequally. Adopting this definition, the task of designing machine learning (ML) models that mitigate unfairness in automated decision-making systems must include causal thinking when introducing protected attributes: Following a recent proposal, we define individuals as being normatively equal if they are equal in a fictitious, normatively desired (FiND) world, where the protected attributes have no (direct or indirect) causal effect on the target. We propose rank-preserving interventional distributions to define a specific FiND world in which this holds and a warping method for estimation. Evaluation criteria for both the method and the resulting ML model are presented and validated through simulations. Experiments on empirical data showcase the practical application of our method and compare results with fairadapt (Plev{c}ko and Meinshausen, 2020), a different approach for mitigating unfairness by causally preprocessing data that uses quantile regression forests. With this, we show that our warping approach effectively identifies the most discriminated individuals and mitigates unfairness.
Read more6/26/2024
💬
0
FairEvalLLM. A Comprehensive Framework for Benchmarking Fairness in Large Language Model Recommender Systems
Yashar Deldjoo, Fatemeh Nazary
The rapid adoption of large language models (LLMs) in recommender systems (RS) presents new challenges in understanding and evaluating their biases, which can result in unfairness or the amplification of stereotypes. Traditional fairness evaluations in RS primarily focus on collaborative filtering (CF) settings, which may not fully capture the complexities of LLMs, as these models often inherit biases from large, unregulated data. This paper proposes a normative framework to benchmark consumer fairness in LLM-powered recommender systems (RecLLMs). We critically examine how fairness norms in classical RS fall short in addressing the challenges posed by LLMs. We argue that this gap can lead to arbitrary conclusions about fairness, and we propose a more structured, formal approach to evaluate fairness in such systems. Our experiments on the MovieLens dataset on consumer fairness, using in-context learning (zero-shot vs. few-shot) reveal fairness deviations in age-based recommendations, particularly when additional contextual examples are introduced (ICL-2). Statistical significance tests confirm that these deviations are not random, highlighting the need for robust evaluation methods. While this work offers a preliminary discussion on a proposed normative framework, our hope is that it could provide a formal, principled approach for auditing and mitigating bias in RecLLMs. The code and dataset used for this work will be shared at gihub-anonymized.
Read more9/12/2024
👨🏫
0
New!Is it Still Fair? A Comparative Evaluation of Fairness Algorithms through the Lens of Covariate Drift
Oscar Blessed Deho, Michael Bewong, Selasi Kwashie, Jiuyong Li, Jixue Liu, Lin Liu, Srecko Joksimovic
Over the last few decades, machine learning (ML) applications have grown exponentially, yielding several benefits to society. However, these benefits are tempered with concerns of discriminatory behaviours exhibited by ML models. In this regard, fairness in machine learning has emerged as a priority research area. Consequently, several fairness metrics and algorithms have been developed to mitigate against discriminatory behaviours that ML models may possess. Yet still, very little attention has been paid to the problem of naturally occurring changes in data patterns (textit{aka} data distributional drift), and its impact on fairness algorithms and metrics. In this work, we study this problem comprehensively by analyzing 4 fairness-unaware baseline algorithms and 7 fairness-aware algorithms, carefully curated to cover the breadth of its typology, across 5 datasets including public and proprietary data, and evaluated them using 3 predictive performance and 10 fairness metrics. In doing so, we show that (1) data distributional drift is not a trivial occurrence, and in several cases can lead to serious deterioration of fairness in so-called fair models; (2) contrary to some existing literature, the size and direction of data distributional drift is not correlated to the resulting size and direction of unfairness; and (3) choice of, and training of fairness algorithms is impacted by the effect of data distributional drift which is largely ignored in the literature. Emanating from our findings, we synthesize several policy implications of data distributional drift on fairness algorithms that can be very relevant to stakeholders and practitioners.
Read more9/20/2024