A Causal Framework for Evaluating Deferring Systems

Overview

• This paper explores how to evaluate the impact of a deferring strategy on the accuracy of supervised machine learning (ML) models.
• Deferring systems allow ML models to defer predictions to human experts, but the effects on model accuracy have not been well studied.
• The paper proposes a causal inference approach to quantify the impact of deferring on predictive accuracy in two scenarios: one where both human and ML predictions are available, and one where only human predictions are known.
• The approach is evaluated on synthetic and real datasets for several deferring systems from the literature.

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning models are increasingly being used to make important decisions, but sometimes these models are not fully reliable. Deferring systems allow these models to "defer" or pass off certain predictions to human experts when the model is uncertain. This can improve the overall accuracy of the system.

However, it's not clear how much of an impact this deferring strategy actually has on the model's predictive accuracy. This paper tackles this question by taking a "causal" approach. The researchers link the idea of "potential outcomes" from causal inference to the deferring system scenario.

In the first case, where we have access to both the model's and the human's predictions for the deferred instances, the researchers can directly measure the individual impact of deferring on accuracy. In the second case, where we only have the human's predictions, they use a statistical technique called regression discontinuity design to estimate the local impact.

The researchers test their approach on both synthetic data and real-world datasets involving several different deferring systems. This allows them to understand the potential benefits and limitations of using deferring strategies to improve machine learning models.

Technical Explanation

This paper proposes a causal inference framework for evaluating the impact of deferring strategies on the predictive accuracy of supervised machine learning (ML) models. Deferring systems allow ML models to defer predictions to human experts when the model is uncertain, with the goal of improving overall system accuracy.

The researchers link the potential outcomes framework from causal inference to the deferring system scenario. This allows them to identify the causal effect of the deferring strategy on predictive accuracy. They consider two main scenarios:

1. Access to both human and ML predictions: In this case, the researchers can directly measure the individual causal effects for deferred instances, as well as aggregates of these effects.

2. Only human predictions available: Here, the researchers use a regression discontinuity design to estimate a local causal effect of the deferring strategy.

The proposed approach is evaluated on both synthetic and real-world datasets for seven different deferring systems from the literature, including learning to defer to population and dynamic model performative human-ML collaboration.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous causal framework for evaluating deferring systems, which is an important and often overlooked area of research. By linking the potential outcomes model to deferring systems, the researchers are able to quantify the causal impact of the deferring strategy on predictive accuracy.

However, the paper does not address potential limitations or caveats of the proposed approach. For example, the regression discontinuity design used in the second scenario relies on certain assumptions that may not always hold in practice. Additionally, the evaluation is limited to a small set of deferring systems, and the performance may vary for other types of models and applications.

Further research could explore the robustness of the causal estimation methods under various sources of unobserved confounding, as well as extend the evaluation to a broader range of deferring systems and real-world scenarios.

Conclusion

This paper presents a causal inference framework for evaluating the impact of deferring strategies on the predictive accuracy of supervised machine learning models. By connecting the potential outcomes model to deferring systems, the researchers are able to quantify the causal effect of deferring on model performance in two different scenarios.

The proposed approach provides a rigorous way to assess the benefits of deferring systems, which can help guide the development and deployment of these systems in real-world applications. As machine learning models become increasingly relied upon for high-stakes decision making, understanding the tradeoffs and limitations of deferring strategies will be crucial for ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of these systems.