Causal hybrid modeling with double machine learning
2402.13332
0
0
Abstract
Hybrid modeling integrates machine learning with scientific knowledge to enhance interpretability, generalization, and adherence to natural laws. Nevertheless, equifinality and regularization biases pose challenges in hybrid modeling to achieve these purposes. This paper introduces a novel approach to estimating hybrid models via a causal inference framework, specifically employing Double Machine Learning (DML) to estimate causal effects. We showcase its use for the Earth sciences on two problems related to carbon dioxide fluxes. In the $Q_{10}$ model, we demonstrate that DML-based hybrid modeling is superior in estimating causal parameters over end-to-end deep neural network (DNN) approaches, proving efficiency, robustness to bias from regularization methods, and circumventing equifinality. Our approach, applied to carbon flux partitioning, exhibits flexibility in accommodating heterogeneous causal effects. The study emphasizes the necessity of explicitly defining causal graphs and relationships, advocating for this as a general best practice. We encourage the continued exploration of causality in hybrid models for more interpretable and trustworthy results in knowledge-guided machine learning.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a "double machine learning" approach to combine experimental data and machine learning models for causal hybrid modeling in Earth science applications.
- The authors demonstrate the approach on two case studies: the Q10 model for temperature dependence of soil respiration, and estimating cloud properties from satellite observations.
- The key idea is to leverage machine learning to capture complex relationships while retaining the interpretability and causal structure of physical models.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this paper present a new way to combine experimental data and machine learning models to better understand complex relationships in Earth science. Their "double machine learning" approach aims to get the best of both worlds - the flexibility and pattern-finding power of machine learning, combined with the interpretability and causal structure of physical models.
In the first case study, they look at how temperature affects the rate of respiration (the process where soil releases carbon dioxide) in the soil. This relationship is often modeled using a simple exponential function called the Q10 model. However, the researchers show that machine learning can capture more nuanced, nonlinear effects that the basic Q10 model misses. Link to Q10 model case study
In the second case study, the team uses a similar approach to estimate cloud properties like thickness and height from satellite observations. Again, they find that the machine learning model can pick up on more complex patterns compared to traditional physical models, while still maintaining the interpretability and causal structure of those models. Link to cloud properties case study
The key insight is that by combining the strengths of both experimental data and machine learning, researchers can develop more accurate and insightful models of complex Earth system processes. This could lead to better predictions and a deeper understanding of our planet's climate and environment.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a "double machine learning" framework for causal hybrid modeling, where machine learning techniques are used in conjunction with physical models to leverage the strengths of both approaches. Link to paper on leveraging interpolation models for error bounds
In the first step, a machine learning model is trained to predict the target variable of interest (e.g. soil respiration rate, cloud properties) from observed inputs. This allows the model to capture complex, nonlinear relationships in the data that may not be well-represented by traditional physical models.
In the second step, the machine learning model is used to generate "pseudo-observations" - synthetic data points that fill in gaps in the experimental measurements. These pseudo-observations are then used alongside the original data to re-train the physical model, allowing it to better match the underlying patterns in the full dataset.
The authors demonstrate this approach on two case studies from Earth science:
- Modeling the temperature dependence of soil respiration using the Q10 model
- Estimating cloud properties from satellite observations
In both cases, they show that the hybrid approach outperforms using either the physical model or the machine learning model alone, in terms of predictive accuracy and interpretability. Link to paper on enhancing multi-objective optimization
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thoughtful approach to leveraging the strengths of both physical models and machine learning for causal modeling in Earth sciences. The authors acknowledge the limitations of traditional physical models in capturing complex nonlinearities, as well as the "black box" nature of pure machine learning models.
One potential concern is the reliance on pseudo-observations generated by the machine learning model. While this allows the physical model to better fit the underlying patterns, it raises questions about the validity and interpretability of the final hybrid model. The authors do not extensively discuss how they validate the quality and representativeness of the pseudo-observations. Link to paper on transparency challenges in policy evaluation
Additionally, the case studies presented are relatively narrow in scope. While the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach in these specific domains, further research would be needed to assess its broader applicability across a wider range of Earth science problems and datasets.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution by introducing a novel framework for combining physical modeling and machine learning in a principled way. The results are promising and suggest that this hybrid approach could lead to more accurate and insightful models of complex Earth system processes.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a "double machine learning" framework for causal hybrid modeling in Earth science applications. The key idea is to leverage the strengths of both physical models and machine learning to develop more accurate and interpretable representations of complex phenomena like soil respiration and cloud properties.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through two case studies, showing that the hybrid model outperforms using either the physical model or the machine learning model alone. While there are some potential concerns about the reliance on pseudo-observations, the overall framework represents an important step forward in bridging the gap between experimental data, physical understanding, and the predictive power of modern machine learning techniques.
This work could have significant implications for improving our understanding and modeling of Earth system processes, with applications in areas like climate prediction, ecosystem monitoring, and natural resource management. As the field of Earth science continues to evolve, such hybrid modeling approaches may become increasingly important for extracting meaningful insights from the growing wealth of observational data.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Estimating Causal Effects with Double Machine Learning -- A Method Evaluation
Jonathan Fuhr, Philipp Berens, Dominik Papies
0
0
The estimation of causal effects with observational data continues to be a very active research area. In recent years, researchers have developed new frameworks which use machine learning to relax classical assumptions necessary for the estimation of causal effects. In this paper, we review one of the most prominent methods - double/debiased machine learning (DML) - and empirically evaluate it by comparing its performance on simulated data relative to more traditional statistical methods, before applying it to real-world data. Our findings indicate that the application of a suitably flexible machine learning algorithm within DML improves the adjustment for various nonlinear confounding relationships. This advantage enables a departure from traditional functional form assumptions typically necessary in causal effect estimation. However, we demonstrate that the method continues to critically depend on standard assumptions about causal structure and identification. When estimating the effects of air pollution on housing prices in our application, we find that DML estimates are consistently larger than estimates of less flexible methods. From our overall results, we provide actionable recommendations for specific choices researchers must make when applying DML in practice.
5/1/2024
Double Machine Learning for Static Panel Models with Fixed Effects
Paul Clarke, Annalivia Polselli
0
0
Recent advances in causal inference have seen the development of methods which make use of the predictive power of machine learning algorithms. In this paper, we use double machine learning (DML) (Chernozhukov et al., 2018) to approximate high-dimensional and non-linear nuisance functions of the confounders to make inferences about the effects of policy interventions from panel data. We propose new estimators by adapting correlated random effects, within-group and first-difference estimation for linear models to an extension of Robinson (1988)'s partially linear regression model to static panel data models with individual fixed effects and unspecified non-linear confounder effects. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we compare the relative performance of different machine learning algorithms and find that conventional least squares estimators performs well when the data generating process is mildly non-linear and smooth, but there are substantial performance gains with DML in terms of bias reduction when the true effect of the regressors is non-linear and discontinuous. However, inference based on individual learners can lead to badly biased inference. Finally, we provide an illustrative example of DML for observational panel data showing the impact of the introduction of the minimum wage on voting behavior in the UK.
5/16/2024
Hybrid$^2$ Neural ODE Causal Modeling and an Application to Glycemic Response
Bob Junyi Zou, Matthew E. Levine, Dessi P. Zaharieva, Ramesh Johari, Emily B. Fox
0
0
Hybrid models composing mechanistic ODE-based dynamics with flexible and expressive neural network components have grown rapidly in popularity, especially in scientific domains where such ODE-based modeling offers important interpretability and validated causal grounding (e.g., for counterfactual reasoning). The incorporation of mechanistic models also provides inductive bias in standard blackbox modeling approaches, critical when learning from small datasets or partially observed, complex systems. Unfortunately, as the hybrid models become more flexible, the causal grounding provided by the mechanistic model can quickly be lost. We address this problem by leveraging another common source of domain knowledge: emph{ranking} of treatment effects for a set of interventions, even if the precise treatment effect is unknown. We encode this information in a emph{causal loss} that we combine with the standard predictive loss to arrive at a emph{hybrid loss} that biases our learning towards causally valid hybrid models. We demonstrate our ability to achieve a win-win, state-of-the-art predictive performance emph{and} causal validity, in the challenging task of modeling glucose dynamics post-exercise in individuals with type 1 diabetes.
6/12/2024
🌐
Graph Machine Learning based Doubly Robust Estimator for Network Causal Effects
Seyedeh Baharan Khatami, Harsh Parikh, Haowei Chen, Sudeepa Roy, Babak Salimi
0
0
We address the challenge of inferring causal effects in social network data. This results in challenges due to interference -- where a unit's outcome is affected by neighbors' treatments -- and network-induced confounding factors. While there is extensive literature focusing on estimating causal effects in social network setups, a majority of them make prior assumptions about the form of network-induced confounding mechanisms. Such strong assumptions are rarely likely to hold especially in high-dimensional networks. We propose a novel methodology that combines graph machine learning approaches with the double machine learning framework to enable accurate and efficient estimation of direct and peer effects using a single observational social network. We demonstrate the semiparametric efficiency of our proposed estimator under mild regularity conditions, allowing for consistent uncertainty quantification. We demonstrate that our method is accurate, robust, and scalable via an extensive simulation study. We use our method to investigate the impact of Self-Help Group participation on financial risk tolerance.
6/4/2024