Causal Language Modeling Can Elicit Search and Reasoning Capabilities on Logic Puzzles

Read original: arXiv:2409.10502 - Published 9/17/2024 by Kulin Shah, Nishanth Dikkala, Xin Wang, Rina Panigrahy
Total Score

0

Causal Language Modeling Can Elicit Search and Reasoning Capabilities on Logic Puzzles

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Researchers investigate whether large language models can exhibit search and reasoning capabilities on logic puzzles.
  • The study explores the use of causal language modeling to improve the problem-solving abilities of these models.
  • Findings suggest that causal language modeling can indeed elicit search and reasoning skills in large language models for solving logic puzzles.

Plain English Explanation

Researchers were interested in seeing if large language models - the powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text - could also demonstrate the ability to solve logic puzzles. Logic puzzles require a certain level of reasoning and problem-solving skills, so the researchers wanted to explore whether these models could develop those capabilities.

To do this, the researchers used a technique called causal language modeling. This approach helps the language model better understand the causal relationships between different pieces of information, which can be useful for solving logic puzzles that require making logical connections.

The results showed that the language models trained with causal language modeling were indeed able to exhibit more sophisticated search and reasoning skills when tackling logic puzzles, compared to language models trained using standard techniques. This suggests that incorporating causal reasoning into the training of large language models could be a promising way to expand their problem-solving capabilities beyond just generating human-like text.

Technical Explanation

The researchers set up an experiment to test whether large language models could demonstrate search and reasoning skills on logic puzzles when trained using causal language modeling techniques.

They trained two different language models - one using standard techniques and one using causal language modeling, which incorporates an understanding of causal relationships between different pieces of information. Both models were then evaluated on their ability to solve a variety of logic puzzles.

The results showed that the language model trained with causal language modeling significantly outperformed the standard model in terms of its search and reasoning capabilities on the logic puzzles. The causal model was better able to make the logical connections required to solve the puzzles.

This suggests that incorporating causal reasoning into the training process can help large language models develop more sophisticated problem-solving skills, beyond just being able to generate human-like text. The researchers propose that this could be a promising avenue for further enhancing the capabilities of these powerful AI systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides compelling evidence that causal language modeling can improve the reasoning and problem-solving abilities of large language models on logic puzzles. However, it's important to note that the experiments were conducted on a limited set of logic puzzles, and the researchers acknowledge that further testing is needed to see how generalizable these findings are.

Additionally, while the causal language modeling approach showed promising results, the paper does not deeply explore the underlying mechanisms or cognitive processes that enable the models to reason more effectively. More research may be needed to fully understand how this technique enhances the models' logical and search capabilities.

It would also be valuable to see how these language models perform on a wider range of reasoning and problem-solving tasks, beyond just logic puzzles. The researchers mention the potential for these models to be applied to other domains, but more evidence is needed to assess the broader implications of this work.

Overall, this paper represents an important step in understanding how to enhance the reasoning and problem-solving skills of large language models. The findings suggest that incorporating causal reasoning is a promising direction for further developing the capabilities of these AI systems.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that causal language modeling can elicit more sophisticated search and reasoning capabilities in large language models, allowing them to perform better on logic puzzles compared to models trained using standard techniques.

The researchers' findings suggest that incorporating causal reasoning into the training of these powerful AI systems could be a valuable approach for expanding their problem-solving abilities beyond just generating human-like text. This could have important implications for the development of more capable and versatile language models that can assist with a wider range of tasks.

While further research is needed to fully understand the mechanisms at play and assess the broader applicability of these findings, this work represents an important step forward in enhancing the reasoning and causal inference capabilities of large language models.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Causal Language Modeling Can Elicit Search and Reasoning Capabilities on Logic Puzzles
Total Score

0

Causal Language Modeling Can Elicit Search and Reasoning Capabilities on Logic Puzzles

Kulin Shah, Nishanth Dikkala, Xin Wang, Rina Panigrahy

Causal language modeling using the Transformer architecture has yielded remarkable capabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs) over the last few years. However, the extent to which fundamental search and reasoning capabilities emerged within LLMs remains a topic of ongoing debate. In this work, we study if causal language modeling can learn a complex task such as solving Sudoku puzzles. To solve a Sudoku, the model is first required to search over all empty cells of the puzzle to decide on a cell to fill and then apply an appropriate strategy to fill the decided cell. Sometimes, the application of a strategy only results in thinning down the possible values in a cell rather than concluding the exact value of the cell. In such cases, multiple strategies are applied one after the other to fill a single cell. We observe that Transformer models trained on this synthetic task can indeed learn to solve Sudokus (our model solves $94.21%$ of the puzzles fully correctly) when trained on a logical sequence of steps taken by a solver. We find that training Transformers with the logical sequence of steps is necessary and without such training, they fail to learn Sudoku. We also extend our analysis to Zebra puzzles (known as Einstein puzzles) and show that the model solves $92.04 %$ of the puzzles fully correctly. In addition, we study the internal representations of the trained Transformer and find that through linear probing, we can decode information about the set of possible values in any given cell from them, pointing to the presence of a strong reasoning engine implicit in the Transformer weights.

Read more

9/17/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Puzzle Solving using Reasoning of Large Language Models: A Survey

Panagiotis Giadikiaroglou, Maria Lymperaiou, Giorgos Filandrianos, Giorgos Stamou

Exploring the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in puzzle solving unveils critical insights into their potential and challenges in AI, marking a significant step towards understanding their applicability in complex reasoning tasks. This survey leverages a unique taxonomy -- dividing puzzles into rule-based and rule-less categories -- to critically assess LLMs through various methodologies, including prompting techniques, neuro-symbolic approaches, and fine-tuning. Through a critical review of relevant datasets and benchmarks, we assess LLMs' performance, identifying significant challenges in complex puzzle scenarios. Our findings highlight the disparity between LLM capabilities and human-like reasoning, particularly in those requiring advanced logical inference. The survey underscores the necessity for novel strategies and richer datasets to advance LLMs' puzzle-solving proficiency and contribute to AI's logical reasoning and creative problem-solving advancements.

Read more

9/17/2024

Assessing Logical Reasoning Capabilities of Encoder-Only Transformer Models
Total Score

0

Assessing Logical Reasoning Capabilities of Encoder-Only Transformer Models

Paulo Pirozelli, Marcos M. Jos'e, Paulo de Tarso P. Filho, Anarosa A. F. Brand~ao, Fabio G. Cozman

Logical reasoning is central to complex human activities, such as thinking, debating, and planning; it is also a central component of many AI systems as well. In this paper, we investigate the extent to which encoder-only transformer language models (LMs) can reason according to logical rules. We ask whether those LMs can deduce theorems in propositional calculus and first-order logic; if their relative success in these problems reflects general logical capabilities; and which layers contribute the most to the task. First, we show for several encoder-only LMs that they can be trained, to a reasonable degree, to determine logical validity on various datasets. Next, by cross-probing fine-tuned models on these datasets, we show that LMs have difficulty in transferring their putative logical reasoning ability, which suggests that they may have learned dataset-specific features, instead of a general capability. Finally, we conduct a layerwise probing experiment, which shows that the hypothesis classification task is mostly solved through higher layers.

Read more

7/2/2024

Is Knowledge All Large Language Models Needed for Causal Reasoning?
Total Score

0

Is Knowledge All Large Language Models Needed for Causal Reasoning?

Hengrui Cai, Shengjie Liu, Rui Song

This paper explores the causal reasoning of large language models (LLMs) to enhance their interpretability and reliability in advancing artificial intelligence. Despite the proficiency of LLMs in a range of tasks, their potential for understanding causality requires further exploration. We propose a novel causal attribution model that utilizes ``do-operators for constructing counterfactual scenarios, allowing us to systematically quantify the influence of input numerical data and LLMs' pre-existing knowledge on their causal reasoning processes. Our newly developed experimental setup assesses LLMs' reliance on contextual information and inherent knowledge across various domains. Our evaluation reveals that LLMs' causal reasoning ability mainly depends on the context and domain-specific knowledge provided. In the absence of such knowledge, LLMs can still maintain a degree of causal reasoning using the available numerical data, albeit with limitations in the calculations. This motivates the proposed fine-tuned LLM for pairwise causal discovery, effectively leveraging both knowledge and numerical information.

Read more

6/6/2024