Causal Temporal Regime Structure Learning

Read original: arXiv:2311.01412 - Published 5/28/2024 by Abdellah Rahmani, Pascal Frossard
Total Score

0

🏅

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a new method called CASTOR for learning the causal structure (directed acyclic graph or DAG) from multivariate time series data that contains multiple, unknown "regimes" or temporal segments.
  • CASTOR jointly learns the DAG structure for each regime and the number of regimes, as well as their sequential arrangement, through an optimization-based approach using an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm.
  • The authors prove the identifiability of the regimes and DAGs within the CASTOR framework and show that it outperforms existing causal discovery models across various settings, including linear and nonlinear causal relationships, and on both synthetic and real-world datasets.

Plain English Explanation

The paper tackles the challenge of understanding the causal relationships in time series data that goes through different, unknown "modes" or "regimes" over time. For example, the relationships between variables in an economic system may change as the economy transitions through phases like growth, recession, and recovery.

CASTOR is a new method that can automatically identify these different regimes and learn the causal structure (represented as a directed acyclic graph or DAG) within each regime. The method works by iteratively alternating between two steps: 1) estimating which time points belong to each regime, and 2) learning the causal DAG for each regime.

By jointly modeling the regimes and causal structures, the CASTOR approach can provide a more accurate and interpretable understanding of the underlying dynamics in complex time series data, compared to existing causal discovery techniques. The authors show that CASTOR outperforms other methods across a variety of synthetic and real-world datasets, for both linear and nonlinear causal relationships.

Technical Explanation

The key innovation in this paper is the CASTOR method, which learns the causal structure (DAG) for each regime in a multivariate time series, while also determining the number of regimes and their sequential arrangement.

CASTOR achieves this through an optimization-based approach that uses an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm. In the "Expectation" step, CASTOR estimates which time points belong to each regime. In the "Maximization" step, it infers the causal DAG structure for each regime. By alternating between these two steps, CASTOR jointly optimizes the regime assignments and causal structures.

The authors also prove that the regimes and DAGs learned by CASTOR are identifiable, meaning that the method can reliably recover the true underlying structure from the data. This is an important theoretical guarantee for the method.

The experimental results show that CASTOR consistently outperforms other state-of-the-art causal discovery models, such as Coordinated Multi-Neighborhood Learning, Hybrid Global Causal Discovery, and Neural Structure Learning, across a range of synthetic and real-world datasets with both linear and nonlinear causal relationships. This demonstrates the effectiveness of CASTOR's joint learning of regimes and causal structures.

Critical Analysis

One potential limitation of the CASTOR approach is that it assumes the causal relationships within each regime can be represented by a DAG structure. In reality, the true causal mechanisms may be more complex and involve temporal dependencies or feedback loops that cannot be fully captured by a DAG.

Additionally, the paper does not extensively explore the sensitivity of CASTOR's performance to the number of regimes or the length of each regime. It would be valuable to understand how robust the method is to variations in these parameters, especially for real-world datasets where the number and duration of regimes may be less clear.

Further research could also investigate ways to incorporate active causal induction techniques into the CASTOR framework, which may allow for more efficient exploration of the space of possible regimes and causal structures.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel optimization-based method called CASTOR that can jointly learn the causal structure and temporal regimes in multivariate time series data. By alternating between estimating the regime assignments and inferring the causal DAGs, CASTOR is able to provide a more accurate and interpretable understanding of complex dynamic systems compared to existing causal discovery techniques.

The theoretical guarantees of identifiability and the empirical demonstrations of CASTOR's superior performance across a variety of datasets and settings highlight the significant contributions of this work to the field of causal inference. Further research to address the potential limitations and expand the capabilities of CASTOR could lead to even more powerful tools for understanding the underlying causal mechanisms in real-world complex systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏅

Total Score

0

Causal Temporal Regime Structure Learning

Abdellah Rahmani, Pascal Frossard

We address the challenge of structure learning from multivariate time series that are characterized by a sequence of different, unknown regimes. We introduce a new optimization-based method (CASTOR), that concurrently learns the Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) for each regime and determine the number of regimes along with their sequential arrangement. Through the optimization of a score function via an expectation maximization (EM) algorithm, CASTOR alternates between learning the regime indices (Expectation step) and inferring causal relationships in each regime (Maximization step). We further prove the identifiability of regimes and DAGs within the CASTOR framework. We conduct extensive experiments and show that our method consistently outperforms causal discovery models across various settings (linear and nonlinear causal relationships) and datasets (synthetic and real data).

Read more

5/28/2024

👁️

Total Score

0

GRACE-C: Generalized Rate Agnostic Causal Estimation via Constraints

Mohammadsajad Abavisani, David Danks, Sergey Plis

Graphical structures estimated by causal learning algorithms from time series data can provide misleading causal information if the causal timescale of the generating process fails to match the measurement timescale of the data. Existing algorithms provide limited resources to respond to this challenge, and so researchers must either use models that they know are likely misleading, or else forego causal learning entirely. Existing methods face up-to-four distinct shortfalls, as they might 1) require that the difference between causal and measurement timescales is known; 2) only handle very small number of random variables when the timescale difference is unknown; 3) only apply to pairs of variables; or 4) be unable to find a solution given statistical noise in the data. This research addresses these challenges. Our approach combines constraint programming with both theoretical insights into the problem structure and prior information about admissible causal interactions to achieve multiple orders of magnitude in speed-up. The resulting system maintains theoretical guarantees while scaling to significantly larger sets of random variables (>100) without knowledge of timescale differences. This method is also robust to edge misidentification and can use parametric connection strengths, while optionally finding the optimal solution among many possible ones.

Read more

5/22/2024

Coordinated Multi-Neighborhood Learning on a Directed Acyclic Graph
Total Score

0

Coordinated Multi-Neighborhood Learning on a Directed Acyclic Graph

Stephen Smith, Qing Zhou

Learning the structure of causal directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) is useful in many areas of machine learning and artificial intelligence, with wide applications. However, in the high-dimensional setting, it is challenging to obtain good empirical and theoretical results without strong and often restrictive assumptions. Additionally, it is questionable whether all of the variables purported to be included in the network are observable. It is of interest then to restrict consideration to a subset of the variables for relevant and reliable inferences. In fact, researchers in various disciplines can usually select a set of target nodes in the network for causal discovery. This paper develops a new constraint-based method for estimating the local structure around multiple user-specified target nodes, enabling coordination in structure learning between neighborhoods. Our method facilitates causal discovery without learning the entire DAG structure. We establish consistency results for our algorithm with respect to the local neighborhood structure of the target nodes in the true graph. Experimental results on synthetic and real-world data show that our algorithm is more accurate in learning the neighborhood structures with much less computational cost than standard methods that estimate the entire DAG. An R package implementing our methods may be accessed at https://github.com/stephenvsmith/CML.

Read more

5/27/2024

🚀

Total Score

0

Learning Graph Structures and Uncertainty for Accurate and Calibrated Time-series Forecasting

Harshavardhan Kamarthi, Lingkai Kong, Alexander Rodriguez, Chao Zhang, B Aditya Prakash

Multi-variate time series forecasting is an important problem with a wide range of applications. Recent works model the relations between time-series as graphs and have shown that propagating information over the relation graph can improve time series forecasting. However, in many cases, relational information is not available or is noisy and reliable. Moreover, most works ignore the underlying uncertainty of time-series both for structure learning and deriving the forecasts resulting in the structure not capturing the uncertainty resulting in forecast distributions with poor uncertainty estimates. We tackle this challenge and introduce STOIC, that leverages stochastic correlations between time-series to learn underlying structure between time-series and to provide well-calibrated and accurate forecasts. Over a wide-range of benchmark datasets STOIC provides around 16% more accurate and 14% better-calibrated forecasts. STOIC also shows better adaptation to noise in data during inference and captures important and useful relational information in various benchmarks.

Read more

7/4/2024