On the Centralization and Regionalization of the Web
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the centralization and regionalization trends in the web, analyzing how the web has evolved from a decentralized network to a more centralized and regionalized system.
- The researchers leverage large-scale datasets to quantify the degree of centralization and regionalization in web usage and infrastructure.
- The findings provide insights into the complex interplay between centralization and regionalization, which have important implications for the future of the web and internet governance.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how the web has changed over time, moving from a decentralized network where information and services were spread out, to a more centralized and regionalized system. The researchers use large datasets to measure and quantify these changes, looking at things like how people use the web and the underlying infrastructure that makes the web work.
The key finding is that the web has become more centralized, with a small number of large platforms and services dominating web usage. At the same time, there is also increasing regionalization, where certain parts of the web are more prominent in different geographic regions.
This has important implications for the future of the web and how it is governed. As a few big tech companies and regional powers have more control, it raises questions about things like free speech online, digital identities, and the overall openness and accessibility of the web.
Technical Explanation
The paper analyzes trends in web centralization and regionalization using large-scale datasets on web usage and infrastructure. Specifically, the researchers examine:
-
Web Usage Centralization: They measure the concentration of web traffic and page views across top websites and platforms, finding increasing dominance of a small number of major players.
-
Web Infrastructure Centralization: They analyze the ownership and control of domain name registrations, content delivery networks, and other critical web infrastructure, observing consolidation in the hands of a few large providers.
-
Regional Differences in Web Usage: The researchers identify significant variations in the most popular websites and online activities across different geographic regions, indicating increasing web regionalization.
-
Regional Differences in Web Infrastructure: Similarly, the distribution and ownership of web infrastructure components like domain registrars and cloud providers exhibits regional patterns, contributing to web regionalization.
The combination of growing centralization in web usage and infrastructure, alongside increasing regionalization, suggests a complex and evolving web ecosystem that departs from the early vision of a decentralized, globally-connected network.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and data-driven analysis of the centralization and regionalization trends in the web. However, there are a few limitations and areas for further research:
-
Temporal Scope: The analysis focuses on a relatively short time period, and it would be valuable to extend the longitudinal perspective to better understand the long-term trajectory of these trends.
-
Causal Mechanisms: While the paper documents the trends, it does not delve deeply into the underlying drivers and causal mechanisms behind centralization and regionalization. More research is needed to unpack these complex factors.
-
Implications for Openness and Innovation: The centralization and regionalization of the web raise concerns about the future of an open, accessible, and innovative internet. The paper could have explored these implications in greater depth.
-
Governance and Policy Considerations: Given the significance of these trends for internet governance, the paper could have provided more discussion on the policy and regulatory frameworks needed to address the challenges posed by web centralization and regionalization.
Conclusion
This paper offers a valuable contribution to the understanding of how the web has evolved from a decentralized network to a more centralized and regionalized system. The findings highlight the complex interplay between these two trends, which have important implications for the future of the web, internet governance, and the ability to maintain an open and accessible online space. The research provides a solid foundation for further exploration of the drivers, consequences, and policy responses to these transformative changes in the web's ecosystem.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
On the Centralization and Regionalization of the Web
Gautam Akiwate, Kimberly Ruth, Rumaisa Habib, Zakir Durumeric
Over the past decade, Internet centralization and its implications for both people and the resilience of the Internet has become a topic of active debate. While the networking community informally agrees on the definition of centralization, we lack a formal metric for quantifying centralization, which limits research beyond descriptive analysis. In this work, we introduce a statistical measure for Internet centralization, which we use to better understand how the web is centralized across four layers of web infrastructure (hosting providers, DNS infrastructure, TLDs, and certificate authorities) in 150~countries. Our work uncovers significant geographical variation, as well as a complex interplay between centralization and sociopolitically driven regionalization. We hope that our work can serve as the foundation for more nuanced analysis to inform this important debate.
Read more7/1/2024
0
Reasoning About Internet Connectivity
Guillermo Baltra, Tarang Saluja, Yuri Pradkin, John Heidemann
Innovation in the Internet requires a global Internet core to enable communication between users in ISPs and services in the cloud. Today, this Internet core is challenged by partial reachability: political pressure threatens fragmentation by nationality, architectural changes such as carrier-grade NAT make connectivity conditional, and operational problems and commercial disputes make reachability incomplete for months. We assert that partial reachability is a fundamental part of the Internet core. While other studies address partial reachability, this paper is the first to provide a conceptual definition of the Internet core so we can reason about reachability from principles first. Following the Internet design, our definition is guided by reachability, not authority. Its corollaries are peninsulas: persistent regions of partial connectivity; and islands: when networks are partitioned from the Internet core. We show that the concept of peninsulas and islands can improve existing measurement systems. In one example, they show that RIPE's DNSmon suffers misconfiguration and persistent network problems that are important, but risk obscuring operationally important connectivity changes because they are $5times$ to $9.7times$ larger. Our evaluation also informs policy questions, showing no single country or organization can unilaterally control the Internet core.
Read more7/22/2024
0
Charting Censorship Resilience and Global Internet Reachability: A Quantitative Approach
Marina Ivanovi'c, Franc{c}ois Wirz, Jordi Subir`a Nieto, Adrian Perrig
Internet censorship and global Internet reachability are prevalent topics of today's Internet. Nonetheless, the impact of network topology and Internet architecture to these aspects of the Internet is under-explored. With the goal of informing policy discussions with an objective basis, we present an approach for evaluating both censorship resilience and global Internet reachability using quantitative network metrics, which are applicable to current BGP/IP networks and also to alternative Internet network architectures. We devise and instantiate the metric on the network topology of multiple countries, comparing the BGP/IP network, an overlay network using a waypoint mechanism for circumventing undesired nodes, and the path-aware Internet architecture SCION. The novelty of the approach resides in providing a metric enabling the analysis of these aspects of the Internet at the routing level, taking into account the innate properties of the routing protocol and architecture. We demonstrate that the Internet topology matters, and strongly influences both censorship resilience and reachability to the global Internet. Finally, we argue that access to multiple paths accompanied with path-awareness could enable a higher level of censorship resilience compared to the current Internet, and reduce the centralization of Internet routing.
Read more7/19/2024
0
Analysis of DNS Dependencies and their Security Implications in Australia: A Comparative Study of General and Indigenous Populations
Niousha Nazemi, Omid Tavallaie, Anna Maria Mandalari, Hamed Haddadi, Ralph Holz, Albert Y. Zomaya
This paper investigates the impact of internet centralization on DNS provisioning, particularly its effects on vulnerable populations such as the indigenous people of Australia. We analyze the DNS dependencies of Australian government domains that serve indigenous communities compared to those serving the general population. Our study categorizes DNS providers into leading (hyperscaler, US-headquartered companies), non-leading (smaller Australian-headquartered or non-Australian companies), and Australian government-hosted providers. Then, we build dependency graphs to demonstrate the direct dependency between Australian government domains and their DNS providers and the indirect dependency involving further layers of providers. Additionally, we conduct an IP location analysis of DNS providers to map out the geographical distribution of DNS servers, revealing the extent of centralization on DNS services within or outside of Australia. Finally, we introduce an attacker model to categorize potential cyber attackers based on their intentions and resources. By considering attacker models and DNS dependency results, we discuss the security vulnerability of each population group against any group of attackers and analyze whether the current setup of the DNS services of Australian government services contributes to a digital divide.
Read more8/26/2024