Reasoning About Internet Connectivity

Read original: arXiv:2407.14427 - Published 7/22/2024 by Guillermo Baltra, Tarang Saluja, Yuri Pradkin, John Heidemann

Overview

The paper discusses the issue of partial reachability in the internet, where certain destinations may be inaccessible from certain locations.
It presents a framework for reasoning about internet connectivity and proposes algorithms to detect and diagnose partial reachability.
The research aims to improve our understanding of internet connectivity and assist in the development of more resilient internet infrastructure.

Plain English Explanation

The internet is a vast, interconnected network of computers and devices around the world. Ideally, every device connected to the internet should be able to communicate with any other device. However, in reality, this is not always the case. Partial reachability refers to the situation where certain destinations on the internet may be inaccessible from certain locations.

This could happen for various reasons, such as internet censorship, network failures, or security measures. For example, a user in one country may be unable to access a website hosted in another country due to government-imposed restrictions. Or a network outage in a specific region could prevent users in that area from reaching certain online services.

The paper proposes a framework for understanding and reasoning about these partial reachability issues. It introduces algorithms that can detect and diagnose the underlying causes of partial reachability, which could help improve the resilience and performance of the internet infrastructure.

By better understanding the factors that contribute to partial reachability, researchers and network operators can work towards building a more interconnected and reliable internet for everyone.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a framework for reasoning about and detecting partial reachability in the internet. The authors define partial reachability as a situation where certain internet destinations are inaccessible from certain locations, even though they may be accessible from other locations.

To address this problem, the researchers propose several algorithms:

Reachability Graph Construction: This algorithm constructs a reachability graph that represents the connectivity between different internet locations and destinations.
Partial Reachability Detection: Using the reachability graph, this algorithm can identify instances of partial reachability, where some destinations are not accessible from certain locations.
Partial Reachability Diagnosis: The diagnosis algorithm aims to determine the underlying causes of the partial reachability, such as network failures, routing issues, or censorship.

The authors evaluate their approach using real-world data from large-scale internet measurement platforms. Their experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms in detecting and diagnosing partial reachability in the internet.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a comprehensive framework for reasoning about and addressing the issue of partial reachability in the internet. The proposed algorithms provide a systematic way to identify and diagnose the underlying causes of this problem, which is an important contribution to the field.

One potential limitation of the research is that it relies on data from specific internet measurement platforms, which may not be representative of the entire internet. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that future work could explore the use of additional data sources to improve the generalizability of their findings.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the specific policy or regulatory implications of partial reachability, such as the role of internet governance and the impact of censorship on global connectivity. Exploring these aspects could further enhance the relevance and impact of the research.

Overall, the paper offers a valuable framework for understanding and addressing the challenges of partial reachability in the internet, which is a crucial issue for ensuring a more resilient and accessible global network.

Conclusion

This paper presents a framework for reasoning about and detecting partial reachability in the internet, where certain destinations are inaccessible from certain locations. The proposed algorithms for constructing reachability graphs, detecting partial reachability, and diagnosing its underlying causes represent an important contribution to our understanding of internet connectivity.

By improving our ability to identify and address partial reachability, this research can help inform the development of more resilient and accessible internet infrastructure. This, in turn, could have significant implications for fostering global connectivity, information access, and technological progress in the digital age.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Reasoning About Internet Connectivity

Guillermo Baltra, Tarang Saluja, Yuri Pradkin, John Heidemann

Innovation in the Internet requires a global Internet core to enable communication between users in ISPs and services in the cloud. Today, this Internet core is challenged by partial reachability: political pressure threatens fragmentation by nationality, architectural changes such as carrier-grade NAT make connectivity conditional, and operational problems and commercial disputes make reachability incomplete for months. We assert that partial reachability is a fundamental part of the Internet core. While other studies address partial reachability, this paper is the first to provide a conceptual definition of the Internet core so we can reason about reachability from principles first. Following the Internet design, our definition is guided by reachability, not authority. Its corollaries are peninsulas: persistent regions of partial connectivity; and islands: when networks are partitioned from the Internet core. We show that the concept of peninsulas and islands can improve existing measurement systems. In one example, they show that RIPE's DNSmon suffers misconfiguration and persistent network problems that are important, but risk obscuring operationally important connectivity changes because they are $5times$ to $9.7times$ larger. Our evaluation also informs policy questions, showing no single country or organization can unilaterally control the Internet core.

7/22/2024

Charting Censorship Resilience and Global Internet Reachability: A Quantitative Approach

Marina Ivanovi'c, Franc{c}ois Wirz, Jordi Subir`a Nieto, Adrian Perrig

Internet censorship and global Internet reachability are prevalent topics of today's Internet. Nonetheless, the impact of network topology and Internet architecture to these aspects of the Internet is under-explored. With the goal of informing policy discussions with an objective basis, we present an approach for evaluating both censorship resilience and global Internet reachability using quantitative network metrics, which are applicable to current BGP/IP networks and also to alternative Internet network architectures. We devise and instantiate the metric on the network topology of multiple countries, comparing the BGP/IP network, an overlay network using a waypoint mechanism for circumventing undesired nodes, and the path-aware Internet architecture SCION. The novelty of the approach resides in providing a metric enabling the analysis of these aspects of the Internet at the routing level, taking into account the innate properties of the routing protocol and architecture. We demonstrate that the Internet topology matters, and strongly influences both censorship resilience and reachability to the global Internet. Finally, we argue that access to multiple paths accompanied with path-awareness could enable a higher level of censorship resilience compared to the current Internet, and reduce the centralization of Internet routing.

7/19/2024

On the Centralization and Regionalization of the Web

Gautam Akiwate, Kimberly Ruth, Rumaisa Habib, Zakir Durumeric

Over the past decade, Internet centralization and its implications for both people and the resilience of the Internet has become a topic of active debate. While the networking community informally agrees on the definition of centralization, we lack a formal metric for quantifying centralization, which limits research beyond descriptive analysis. In this work, we introduce a statistical measure for Internet centralization, which we use to better understand how the web is centralized across four layers of web infrastructure (hosting providers, DNS infrastructure, TLDs, and certificate authorities) in 150~countries. Our work uncovers significant geographical variation, as well as a complex interplay between centralization and sociopolitically driven regionalization. We hope that our work can serve as the foundation for more nuanced analysis to inform this important debate.

7/1/2024

🧪

How We Lost The Internet

Micah Beck, Terry Moore

In this paper we reexamine an assumption that underpinned the development of the Internet architecture, namely that a stateless and loosely synchronous point-to-point datagram delivery service would be sufficient to meet the needs of all network applications, including those which deliver content and services to a mass audience at global scale. Such applications are inherently asynchronous and point-to-multipoint in nature. We explain how the inability of distributed systems based on this stateless datagram service to provide adequate and affordable support for them within the public (I.e., universally shared and available) network led to the development of private overlay infrastructures, specifically Content Delivery Networks and distributed Cloud data centers. We argue that the burdens imposed by reliance on these private overlays may have been an obstacle to achieving the Open Data Networking goals of early Internet advocates. The contradiction between those initial goals and the exploitative commercial imperatives of hypergiant overlay operators is offered as a possibly important reason for the negative impact of their most profitable applications (e.g., social media) and monetization strategies (e.g., targeted advertisement). We propose that one important step in resolving this contradiction may be to reconsider the adequacy Internet's stateless datagram service model.

9/10/2024