Charting Censorship Resilience and Global Internet Reachability: A Quantitative Approach
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents a quantitative approach to charting censorship resilience and global internet reachability.
- It explores metrics and methods for assessing the impact of internet censorship and the ability of next-generation internet architectures to resist censorship.
- The research aims to provide insights for policymakers, network operators, and researchers interested in internet freedom and the future of the global network.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this study wanted to find better ways to measure how much control governments and other entities have over the internet, and how resistant the internet is to being censored or blocked. They looked at different metrics and techniques that could be used to track censorship and evaluate the ability of new internet technologies to withstand censorship efforts.
The goal was to give policymakers, internet service providers, and researchers who are interested in internet freedom and the future of the global internet network some useful information and tools. By having a more quantitative and rigorous way to assess censorship and reachability, they hope to inform discussions and decisions around internet governance and the design of next-generation internet architectures.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a set of quantitative metrics that can be used to measure different aspects of internet censorship and global reachability. These include metrics related to routing-induced censorship changes, spatial models of internet access, and network centralization and regionalization.
The researchers also propose a new metric called "network sovereignty" that aims to quantify the degree of control and autonomy different regions or entities have over internet infrastructure and routing.
By applying these metrics, the researchers were able to perform a detailed quantitative analysis of internet censorship resilience and reachability. This provides insights into the current state of the global internet as well as the potential impact of future technology and policy changes.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges that the proposed metrics and methods have limitations, as measuring internet censorship and reachability is an inherently complex challenge. The researchers note that their analysis is based on available data sources, which may not fully capture all aspects of the global internet ecosystem.
Additionally, the application of these metrics may be influenced by factors such as the selection of vantage points, the completeness of routing data, and the interpretation of what constitutes censorship or reachability. Further research and validation would be needed to fully establish the reliability and generalizability of the presented approaches.
Nevertheless, the paper represents an important step forward in developing more rigorous and quantitative frameworks for assessing internet freedom and resilience. The insights and methodologies offered can serve as a foundation for continued exploration and refinement in this critical area of internet governance and policy.
Conclusion
This research paper introduces a quantitative approach to charting censorship resilience and global internet reachability. By proposing new metrics and methods, the authors aim to provide policymakers, network operators, and researchers with tools to better understand and monitor the state of internet freedom and the potential impacts of future technology and policy changes.
While the presented techniques have limitations, they demonstrate the value of a more rigorous, data-driven approach to assessing internet censorship and reachability. This work can help inform discussions and decisions around internet governance, the design of next-generation internet architectures, and the ongoing efforts to maintain a global, open, and resilient internet.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Charting Censorship Resilience and Global Internet Reachability: A Quantitative Approach
Marina Ivanovi'c, Franc{c}ois Wirz, Jordi Subir`a Nieto, Adrian Perrig
Internet censorship and global Internet reachability are prevalent topics of today's Internet. Nonetheless, the impact of network topology and Internet architecture to these aspects of the Internet is under-explored. With the goal of informing policy discussions with an objective basis, we present an approach for evaluating both censorship resilience and global Internet reachability using quantitative network metrics, which are applicable to current BGP/IP networks and also to alternative Internet network architectures. We devise and instantiate the metric on the network topology of multiple countries, comparing the BGP/IP network, an overlay network using a waypoint mechanism for circumventing undesired nodes, and the path-aware Internet architecture SCION. The novelty of the approach resides in providing a metric enabling the analysis of these aspects of the Internet at the routing level, taking into account the innate properties of the routing protocol and architecture. We demonstrate that the Internet topology matters, and strongly influences both censorship resilience and reachability to the global Internet. Finally, we argue that access to multiple paths accompanied with path-awareness could enable a higher level of censorship resilience compared to the current Internet, and reduce the centralization of Internet routing.
Read more7/19/2024
0
Reasoning About Internet Connectivity
Guillermo Baltra, Tarang Saluja, Yuri Pradkin, John Heidemann
Innovation in the Internet requires a global Internet core to enable communication between users in ISPs and services in the cloud. Today, this Internet core is challenged by partial reachability: political pressure threatens fragmentation by nationality, architectural changes such as carrier-grade NAT make connectivity conditional, and operational problems and commercial disputes make reachability incomplete for months. We assert that partial reachability is a fundamental part of the Internet core. While other studies address partial reachability, this paper is the first to provide a conceptual definition of the Internet core so we can reason about reachability from principles first. Following the Internet design, our definition is guided by reachability, not authority. Its corollaries are peninsulas: persistent regions of partial connectivity; and islands: when networks are partitioned from the Internet core. We show that the concept of peninsulas and islands can improve existing measurement systems. In one example, they show that RIPE's DNSmon suffers misconfiguration and persistent network problems that are important, but risk obscuring operationally important connectivity changes because they are $5times$ to $9.7times$ larger. Our evaluation also informs policy questions, showing no single country or organization can unilaterally control the Internet core.
Read more7/22/2024
📉
0
Pathfinder: Exploring Path Diversity for Assessing Internet Censorship Inconsistency
Xiaoqin Liang, Guannan Liu, Lin Jin, Shuai Hao, Haining Wang
Internet censorship is typically enforced by authorities to achieve information control for a certain group of Internet users. So far existing censorship studies have primarily focused on country-level characterization because (1) in many cases, censorship is enabled by governments with nationwide policies and (2) it is usually hard to control how the probing packets are routed to trigger censorship in different networks inside a country. However, the deployment and implementation of censorship could be highly diverse at the ISP level. In this paper, we investigate Internet censorship from a different perspective by scrutinizing the diverse censorship deployment inside a country. Specifically, by leveraging an end-to-end measurement framework, we deploy multiple geo-distributed back-end control servers to explore various paths from one single vantage point. The generated traffic with the same domain but different control servers' IPs could be forced to traverse different transit networks, thereby being examined by different censorship devices if present. Through our large-scale experiments and in-depth investigation, we reveal that the diversity of Internet censorship caused by different routing paths inside a country is prevalent, implying that (1) the implementations of centralized censorship are commonly incomplete or flawed and (2) decentralized censorship is also common. Moreover, we identify that different hosting platforms also result in inconsistent censorship activities due to different peering relationships with the ISPs in a country. Finally, we present extensive case studies in detail to illustrate the configurations that lead to censorship inconsistency and explore the causes.
Read more7/8/2024
0
Understanding Routing-Induced Censorship Changes Globally
Abhishek Bhaskar, Paul Pearce
Internet censorship is pervasive, with significant effort dedicated to understanding what is censored, and where. Prior censorship work however have identified significant inconsistencies in their results; experiments show unexplained non-determinism thought to be caused by censor load, end-host geographic diversity, or incomplete censorship -- inconsistencies which impede reliable, repeatable and correct understanding of global censorship. In this work we investigate the extent to which Equal-cost Multi-path (ECMP) routing is the cause for these inconsistencies, developing methods to measure and compensate for them. We find ECMP routing significantly changes observed censorship across protocols, censor mechanisms, and in 17 countries. We identify that previously observed non-determinism or regional variations are attributable to measurements between fixed end-hosts taking different routes based on Flow-ID; i.e., choice of intra-subnet source IP or ephemeral source port leads to differences in observed censorship. To achieve this we develop new route-stable censorship measurement methods that allow consistent measurement of DNS, HTTP, and HTTPS censorship. We find ECMP routing yields censorship changes across 42% of IPs and 51% of ASes, but that impact is not uniform. We identify numerous causes of the behavior, ranging from likely failed infrastructure, to routes to the same end-host taking geographically diverse paths which experience differences in censorship en-route. Finally, we explore our results in the context of prior global measurement studies, exploring first the applicability of our findings to prior observed variations, and then demonstrating how specific experiments from two studies could be impacted by, and specific results are explainable by, ECMP routing. Our work points to methods for improving future studies, reducing inconsistencies and increasing repeatability.
Read more6/28/2024