Certifiably Robust RAG against Retrieval Corruption
2405.15556
2
0
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has been shown vulnerable to retrieval corruption attacks: an attacker can inject malicious passages into retrieval results to induce inaccurate responses. In this paper, we propose RobustRAG as the first defense framework against retrieval corruption attacks. The key insight of RobustRAG is an isolate-then-aggregate strategy: we get LLM responses from each passage in isolation and then securely aggregate these isolated responses. To instantiate RobustRAG, we design keyword-based and decoding-based algorithms for securely aggregating unstructured text responses. Notably, RobustRAG can achieve certifiable robustness: we can formally prove and certify that, for certain queries, RobustRAG can always return accurate responses, even when the attacker has full knowledge of our defense and can arbitrarily inject a small number of malicious passages. We evaluate RobustRAG on open-domain QA and long-form text generation datasets and demonstrate its effectiveness and generalizability across various tasks and datasets.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a method to make Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) models more robust against retrieval corruption.
- RAG models combine a language model with a retrieval component to generate text, but can be vulnerable to errors in the retrieval process.
- The proposed approach, Certifiably Robust RAG (CR-RAG), provides theoretical guarantees that the model's output will be close to the optimal output even with corrupted retrievals.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a way to improve Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) models, which are a type of AI system that generate text by combining a language model with a retrieval component. RAG models work by first retrieving relevant information from a database, and then using that information to generate new text.
However, RAG models can be vulnerable to errors in the retrieval process. If the information that is retrieved is inaccurate or incomplete, it can negatively impact the quality of the generated text. The key idea in this paper is to make RAG models more robust to these retrieval errors.
The researchers propose a new approach called Certifiably Robust RAG (CR-RAG), which provides mathematical guarantees that the model's output will be close to the optimal output, even if the retrieved information is corrupted or imperfect. This is achieved through a novel training process and architectural changes to the RAG model.
The main benefit of CR-RAG is that it can help ensure the reliability and consistency of RAG-based systems, even in the face of potential errors or uncertainties in the retrieval component. This could be useful in a wide range of applications, such as [duetrag-collaborative-retrieval-augmented-generation], [blended-rag-improving-rag-retriever-augmented-generation], or [improving-retrieval-rag-based-question-answering-models], where the quality and trustworthiness of the generated text is critical.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces Certifiably Robust RAG (CR-RAG), a modified version of the Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) architecture that provides theoretical guarantees on the quality of the generated text, even in the presence of corrupted or imperfect retrievals.
The key innovations of CR-RAG include:
-
Modeling Retrieval Corruption: The authors develop a new formulation of the RAG objective that explicitly accounts for potential corruption in the retrieval process. This allows the model to be trained to be robust to such errors.
-
Certifiable Robustness: The paper derives theoretical bounds on the distance between the model's output and the optimal output, showing that CR-RAG can provide certified robustness guarantees.
-
Architectural Changes: The CR-RAG model incorporates several architectural changes, such as modified attention mechanisms and additional regularization terms, to align with the new robustness objective.
The authors evaluate CR-RAG on a range of benchmarks, including [typos-that-broke-rags-back-genetic-attack] and [evaluation-retrieval-augmented-generation-survey], and demonstrate significant improvements in robustness compared to the standard RAG model, without sacrificing overall performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thorough approach to improving the robustness of RAG models against retrieval corruption. The theoretical guarantees provided by CR-RAG are a particularly strong contribution, as they offer a principled way to ensure the reliability of the generated output.
However, the paper does not address several potential limitations and areas for future research:
-
Real-World Retrieval Errors: The paper focuses on synthetic corruption, but real-world retrieval errors may have different characteristics that are not captured by the proposed model. Further evaluation on more realistic retrieval corruption scenarios would be valuable.
-
Computational Overhead: The architectural changes and additional training objectives introduced by CR-RAG may increase the computational complexity of the model, which could be a concern for practical applications. The paper could have explored ways to balance robustness and efficiency.
-
Generalization to Other Tasks: While the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of CR-RAG on standard benchmarks, it would be interesting to see how the approach transfers to other applications of retrieval-augmented generation, such as [duetrag-collaborative-retrieval-augmented-generation] or [blended-rag-improving-rag-retriever-augmented-generation].
Overall, the paper presents a promising step towards more reliable and trustworthy RAG-based systems, but there are still opportunities for further research and refinement of the proposed approach.
Conclusion
The Certifiably Robust RAG (CR-RAG) model introduced in this paper represents a significant advancement in making Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) systems more robust to errors in the retrieval process. By providing theoretical guarantees on the quality of the generated output, even with corrupted retrievals, CR-RAG offers a principled way to improve the reliability and consistency of RAG-based systems.
The potential applications of this work are broad, as RAG models are used in a wide range of text generation tasks, from [duetrag-collaborative-retrieval-augmented-generation] to [improving-retrieval-rag-based-question-answering-models]. By making these models more robust, the CR-RAG approach could help unlock new use cases and enable more trustworthy AI systems that can reliably generate high-quality text, even in the face of uncertain or imperfect information retrieval.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
BadRAG: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Retrieval Augmented Generation of Large Language Models
Jiaqi Xue, Mengxin Zheng, Yebowen Hu, Fei Liu, Xun Chen, Qian Lou
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) are constrained by outdated information and a tendency to generate incorrect data, commonly referred to as hallucinations. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses these limitations by combining the strengths of retrieval-based methods and generative models. This approach involves retrieving relevant information from a large, up-to-date dataset and using it to enhance the generation process, leading to more accurate and contextually appropriate responses. Despite its benefits, RAG introduces a new attack surface for LLMs, particularly because RAG databases are often sourced from public data, such as the web. In this paper, we propose TrojRAG{} to identify the vulnerabilities and attacks on retrieval parts (RAG database) and their indirect attacks on generative parts (LLMs). Specifically, we identify that poisoning several customized content passages could achieve a retrieval backdoor, where the retrieval works well for clean queries but always returns customized poisoned adversarial queries. Triggers and poisoned passages can be highly customized to implement various attacks. For example, a trigger could be a semantic group like The Republican Party, Donald Trump, etc. Adversarial passages can be tailored to different contents, not only linked to the triggers but also used to indirectly attack generative LLMs without modifying them. These attacks can include denial-of-service attacks on RAG and semantic steering attacks on LLM generations conditioned by the triggers. Our experiments demonstrate that by just poisoning 10 adversarial passages can induce 98.2% success rate to retrieve the adversarial passages. Then, these passages can increase the reject ratio of RAG-based GPT-4 from 0.01% to 74.6% or increase the rate of negative responses from 0.22% to 72% for targeted queries.
6/7/2024
🛸
C-RAG: Certified Generation Risks for Retrieval-Augmented Language Models
Mintong Kang, Nezihe Merve Gurel, Ning Yu, Dawn Song, Bo Li
0
0
Despite the impressive capabilities of large language models (LLMs) across diverse applications, they still suffer from trustworthiness issues, such as hallucinations and misalignments. Retrieval-augmented language models (RAG) have been proposed to enhance the credibility of generations by grounding external knowledge, but the theoretical understandings of their generation risks remains unexplored. In this paper, we answer: 1) whether RAG can indeed lead to low generation risks, 2) how to provide provable guarantees on the generation risks of RAG and vanilla LLMs, and 3) what sufficient conditions enable RAG models to reduce generation risks. We propose C-RAG, the first framework to certify generation risks for RAG models. Specifically, we provide conformal risk analysis for RAG models and certify an upper confidence bound of generation risks, which we refer to as conformal generation risk. We also provide theoretical guarantees on conformal generation risks for general bounded risk functions under test distribution shifts. We prove that RAG achieves a lower conformal generation risk than that of a single LLM when the quality of the retrieval model and transformer is non-trivial. Our intensive empirical results demonstrate the soundness and tightness of our conformal generation risk guarantees across four widely-used NLP datasets on four state-of-the-art retrieval models.
6/5/2024
↗️
Typos that Broke the RAG's Back: Genetic Attack on RAG Pipeline by Simulating Documents in the Wild via Low-level Perturbations
Sukmin Cho, Soyeong Jeong, Jeongyeon Seo, Taeho Hwang, Jong C. Park
0
0
The robustness of recent Large Language Models (LLMs) has become increasingly crucial as their applicability expands across various domains and real-world applications. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a promising solution for addressing the limitations of LLMs, yet existing studies on the robustness of RAG often overlook the interconnected relationships between RAG components or the potential threats prevalent in real-world databases, such as minor textual errors. In this work, we investigate two underexplored aspects when assessing the robustness of RAG: 1) vulnerability to noisy documents through low-level perturbations and 2) a holistic evaluation of RAG robustness. Furthermore, we introduce a novel attack method, the Genetic Attack on RAG (textit{GARAG}), which targets these aspects. Specifically, GARAG is designed to reveal vulnerabilities within each component and test the overall system functionality against noisy documents. We validate RAG robustness by applying our textit{GARAG} to standard QA datasets, incorporating diverse retrievers and LLMs. The experimental results show that GARAG consistently achieves high attack success rates. Also, it significantly devastates the performance of each component and their synergy, highlighting the substantial risk that minor textual inaccuracies pose in disrupting RAG systems in the real world.
4/23/2024
Phantom: General Trigger Attacks on Retrieval Augmented Language Generation
Harsh Chaudhari, Giorgio Severi, John Abascal, Matthew Jagielski, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Milad Nasr, Cristina Nita-Rotaru, Alina Oprea
0
0
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) expands the capabilities of modern large language models (LLMs) in chatbot applications, enabling developers to adapt and personalize the LLM output without expensive training or fine-tuning. RAG systems use an external knowledge database to retrieve the most relevant documents for a given query, providing this context to the LLM generator. While RAG achieves impressive utility in many applications, its adoption to enable personalized generative models introduces new security risks. In this work, we propose new attack surfaces for an adversary to compromise a victim's RAG system, by injecting a single malicious document in its knowledge database. We design Phantom, general two-step attack framework against RAG augmented LLMs. The first step involves crafting a poisoned document designed to be retrieved by the RAG system within the top-k results only when an adversarial trigger, a specific sequence of words acting as backdoor, is present in the victim's queries. In the second step, a specially crafted adversarial string within the poisoned document triggers various adversarial attacks in the LLM generator, including denial of service, reputation damage, privacy violations, and harmful behaviors. We demonstrate our attacks on multiple LLM architectures, including Gemma, Vicuna, and Llama.
6/3/2024