Typos that Broke the RAG's Back: Genetic Attack on RAG Pipeline by Simulating Documents in the Wild via Low-level Perturbations
2404.13948
0
0
↗️
Abstract
The robustness of recent Large Language Models (LLMs) has become increasingly crucial as their applicability expands across various domains and real-world applications. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a promising solution for addressing the limitations of LLMs, yet existing studies on the robustness of RAG often overlook the interconnected relationships between RAG components or the potential threats prevalent in real-world databases, such as minor textual errors. In this work, we investigate two underexplored aspects when assessing the robustness of RAG: 1) vulnerability to noisy documents through low-level perturbations and 2) a holistic evaluation of RAG robustness. Furthermore, we introduce a novel attack method, the Genetic Attack on RAG (textit{GARAG}), which targets these aspects. Specifically, GARAG is designed to reveal vulnerabilities within each component and test the overall system functionality against noisy documents. We validate RAG robustness by applying our textit{GARAG} to standard QA datasets, incorporating diverse retrievers and LLMs. The experimental results show that GARAG consistently achieves high attack success rates. Also, it significantly devastates the performance of each component and their synergy, highlighting the substantial risk that minor textual inaccuracies pose in disrupting RAG systems in the real world.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models, which are a promising approach to address the limitations of large language models (LLMs).
- The researchers focus on two underexplored aspects of RAG robustness: vulnerability to noisy documents through low-level perturbations and a holistic evaluation of RAG robustness.
- They introduce a novel attack method called the Genetic Attack on RAG (GARAG) to target these aspects and reveal vulnerabilities within each component of the RAG system.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly important as they find applications in various domains. However, their robustness, or ability to maintain performance in the face of challenges, is crucial as they are used in real-world scenarios.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a promising approach to address the limitations of LLMs. RAG systems combine an LLM with a retrieval component that can access additional information to improve the model's performance.
This paper looks at two important but overlooked aspects of RAG robustness. First, it examines how RAG systems can be affected by small errors or changes in the documents they retrieve information from. Real-world databases often contain minor textual inaccuracies, and the researchers wanted to see how this impacts RAG performance.
Second, the paper takes a comprehensive look at RAG robustness, considering how the different components of the system work together and how vulnerabilities in one part can affect the overall functionality.
To explore these aspects, the researchers developed a new attack method called the Genetic Attack on RAG (GARAG). This attack targets the individual components of the RAG system as well as the system as a whole, using small changes to input texts to disrupt the model's performance.
By applying GARAG to standard question-answering datasets and using different retrieval methods and LLMs, the researchers were able to show that even minor textual errors can significantly reduce the performance of RAG systems. This highlights the substantial risk that inaccuracies in real-world databases can pose for these models.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates two underexplored aspects of the robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models:
-
Vulnerability to noisy documents through low-level perturbations: RAG systems rely on retrieving information from external databases, which may contain minor textual errors or inaccuracies. The researchers wanted to assess how these small changes affect the performance of RAG models.
-
Holistic evaluation of RAG robustness: Rather than just looking at individual components, the paper takes a comprehensive approach to evaluating RAG robustness, considering how vulnerabilities in one part of the system can impact the overall functionality.
To address these aspects, the researchers introduce a novel attack method called the Genetic Attack on RAG (GARAG). GARAG is designed to target both the individual components of the RAG system (the retriever and the language model) as well as the system as a whole.
The researchers validate the robustness of RAG by applying GARAG to standard question-answering datasets, using a variety of retrieval methods and language models. The experimental results show that GARAG consistently achieves high attack success rates, significantly degrading the performance of each component and their synergy.
This highlights the substantial risk that minor textual inaccuracies in real-world databases pose for disrupting RAG systems. The paper's findings suggest that the robustness of RAG models is a crucial consideration as their use expands across various domains and applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and thoughtful analysis of the robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models, addressing two important but overlooked aspects: vulnerability to noisy documents and a holistic evaluation of the system.
The introduction of the Genetic Attack on RAG (GARAG) is a valuable contribution, as it allows the researchers to systematically explore the impact of textual errors and perturbations on RAG performance. By applying GARAG to standard datasets and a range of retrieval methods and language models, the paper provides a thorough and rigorous evaluation of RAG robustness.
One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses primarily on the impact of low-level textual perturbations, without considering other types of real-world noise or challenges that RAG systems may encounter. For example, the researchers do not explore the model's resilience to adversarial attacks, changes in the underlying knowledge base, or shifts in the distribution of input data.
Additionally, while the paper highlights the substantial risk that minor textual inaccuracies pose for RAG systems, it does not provide specific recommendations or strategies for improving the robustness of these models. Further research could investigate techniques for building more resilient RAG architectures or for detecting and mitigating the impact of noisy inputs.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of RAG robustness and provides a solid foundation for future research in this area. The introduction of the GARAG attack method and the comprehensive evaluation of RAG systems are particularly noteworthy and could inspire further work on enhancing the reliability of these models in real-world applications.
Conclusion
This research paper investigates two important but underexplored aspects of the robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models: their vulnerability to noisy documents and a holistic evaluation of their overall system functionality.
The researchers introduce a novel attack method called the Genetic Attack on RAG (GARAG) to systematically assess these aspects of RAG robustness. By applying GARAG to standard question-answering datasets and using diverse retrieval methods and language models, the paper demonstrates that even minor textual errors can significantly disrupt the performance of RAG systems.
These findings highlight the substantial risk that inaccuracies in real-world databases pose for RAG models, which are becoming increasingly important as their applications expand across various domains. The paper's comprehensive approach to evaluating RAG robustness provides valuable insights for researchers and practitioners working to develop more reliable and resilient AI systems.
As the use of large language models and retrieval-augmented architectures continues to grow, addressing the robustness challenges identified in this research will be crucial for ensuring the trustworthiness and safety of these technologies in real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
BadRAG: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Retrieval Augmented Generation of Large Language Models
Jiaqi Xue, Mengxin Zheng, Yebowen Hu, Fei Liu, Xun Chen, Qian Lou
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) are constrained by outdated information and a tendency to generate incorrect data, commonly referred to as hallucinations. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses these limitations by combining the strengths of retrieval-based methods and generative models. This approach involves retrieving relevant information from a large, up-to-date dataset and using it to enhance the generation process, leading to more accurate and contextually appropriate responses. Despite its benefits, RAG introduces a new attack surface for LLMs, particularly because RAG databases are often sourced from public data, such as the web. In this paper, we propose TrojRAG{} to identify the vulnerabilities and attacks on retrieval parts (RAG database) and their indirect attacks on generative parts (LLMs). Specifically, we identify that poisoning several customized content passages could achieve a retrieval backdoor, where the retrieval works well for clean queries but always returns customized poisoned adversarial queries. Triggers and poisoned passages can be highly customized to implement various attacks. For example, a trigger could be a semantic group like The Republican Party, Donald Trump, etc. Adversarial passages can be tailored to different contents, not only linked to the triggers but also used to indirectly attack generative LLMs without modifying them. These attacks can include denial-of-service attacks on RAG and semantic steering attacks on LLM generations conditioned by the triggers. Our experiments demonstrate that by just poisoning 10 adversarial passages can induce 98.2% success rate to retrieve the adversarial passages. Then, these passages can increase the reject ratio of RAG-based GPT-4 from 0.01% to 74.6% or increase the rate of negative responses from 0.22% to 72% for targeted queries.
6/7/2024
Certifiably Robust RAG against Retrieval Corruption
Chong Xiang, Tong Wu, Zexuan Zhong, David Wagner, Danqi Chen, Prateek Mittal
0
0
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has been shown vulnerable to retrieval corruption attacks: an attacker can inject malicious passages into retrieval results to induce inaccurate responses. In this paper, we propose RobustRAG as the first defense framework against retrieval corruption attacks. The key insight of RobustRAG is an isolate-then-aggregate strategy: we get LLM responses from each passage in isolation and then securely aggregate these isolated responses. To instantiate RobustRAG, we design keyword-based and decoding-based algorithms for securely aggregating unstructured text responses. Notably, RobustRAG can achieve certifiable robustness: we can formally prove and certify that, for certain queries, RobustRAG can always return accurate responses, even when the attacker has full knowledge of our defense and can arbitrarily inject a small number of malicious passages. We evaluate RobustRAG on open-domain QA and long-form text generation datasets and demonstrate its effectiveness and generalizability across various tasks and datasets.
5/27/2024
Phantom: General Trigger Attacks on Retrieval Augmented Language Generation
Harsh Chaudhari, Giorgio Severi, John Abascal, Matthew Jagielski, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Milad Nasr, Cristina Nita-Rotaru, Alina Oprea
0
0
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) expands the capabilities of modern large language models (LLMs) in chatbot applications, enabling developers to adapt and personalize the LLM output without expensive training or fine-tuning. RAG systems use an external knowledge database to retrieve the most relevant documents for a given query, providing this context to the LLM generator. While RAG achieves impressive utility in many applications, its adoption to enable personalized generative models introduces new security risks. In this work, we propose new attack surfaces for an adversary to compromise a victim's RAG system, by injecting a single malicious document in its knowledge database. We design Phantom, general two-step attack framework against RAG augmented LLMs. The first step involves crafting a poisoned document designed to be retrieved by the RAG system within the top-k results only when an adversarial trigger, a specific sequence of words acting as backdoor, is present in the victim's queries. In the second step, a specially crafted adversarial string within the poisoned document triggers various adversarial attacks in the LLM generator, including denial of service, reputation damage, privacy violations, and harmful behaviors. We demonstrate our attacks on multiple LLM architectures, including Gemma, Vicuna, and Llama.
6/3/2024
🛸
TrojanRAG: Retrieval-Augmented Generation Can Be Backdoor Driver in Large Language Models
Pengzhou Cheng, Yidong Ding, Tianjie Ju, Zongru Wu, Wei Du, Ping Yi, Zhuosheng Zhang, Gongshen Liu
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have raised concerns about potential security threats despite performing significantly in Natural Language Processing (NLP). Backdoor attacks initially verified that LLM is doing substantial harm at all stages, but the cost and robustness have been criticized. Attacking LLMs is inherently risky in security review, while prohibitively expensive. Besides, the continuous iteration of LLMs will degrade the robustness of backdoors. In this paper, we propose TrojanRAG, which employs a joint backdoor attack in the Retrieval-Augmented Generation, thereby manipulating LLMs in universal attack scenarios. Specifically, the adversary constructs elaborate target contexts and trigger sets. Multiple pairs of backdoor shortcuts are orthogonally optimized by contrastive learning, thus constraining the triggering conditions to a parameter subspace to improve the matching. To improve the recall of the RAG for the target contexts, we introduce a knowledge graph to construct structured data to achieve hard matching at a fine-grained level. Moreover, we normalize the backdoor scenarios in LLMs to analyze the real harm caused by backdoors from both attackers' and users' perspectives and further verify whether the context is a favorable tool for jailbreaking models. Extensive experimental results on truthfulness, language understanding, and harmfulness show that TrojanRAG exhibits versatility threats while maintaining retrieval capabilities on normal queries.
6/3/2024