Characterizing Online Toxicity During the 2022 Mpox Outbreak: A Computational Analysis of Topical and Network Dynamics
0
🌐
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research analyzes the toxic online discourse surrounding the 2022 Mpox (formerly known as Monkeypox) outbreak.
- The goal is to understand the origins, nature, and dissemination patterns of this toxicity, in order to inform strategies for mitigating such issues during future crises.
- The researchers collected over 1.6 million tweets and examined them from various perspectives, including context, extent, content, speaker, and intent.
Plain English Explanation
The 2022 Mpox outbreak became a significant social issue, as the online conversation surrounding it was often marked by harassment, hate speech, and the spread of misinformation.
To better understand this problem, the researchers analyzed a large dataset of tweets to identify the key topics and patterns in the toxic online discourse. They found that the toxic content spanned several areas, including discussions about the disease itself, healthcare policies, homophobia, politics, and racism.
By tracking the spread of this toxic content through retweets and influential users, the researchers were able to gain insights into how it diffused across social media. This can help inform strategies for addressing the central figures driving the spread of toxicity, and improve crisis communication efforts.
Technical Explanation
The researchers collected a dataset of over 1.6 million unique tweets related to the 2022 Mpox outbreak. They analyzed this data from five key dimensions: context, extent, content, speaker, and intent.
Using BERT-based topic modeling and social network community clustering, the team delineated the toxic dynamics on Twitter. They identified five high-level topic categories in the toxic online discourse:
- Disease (46.6%)
- Health policy and healthcare (19.3%)
- Homophobia (23.9%)
- Politics (6.0%)
- Racism (4.1%)
By examining the toxicity diffusion networks of mentions, retweets, and the top users, the researchers found that the spread of toxic content through retweets was widespread. However, influential users rarely engaged with or countered this toxicity through retweets.
Critical Analysis
The research provides valuable insights into the complex dynamics of online toxicity during a public health crisis. However, it is important to note that the study was limited to the Twitter platform, and the findings may not fully generalize to other social media environments.
Additionally, while the topic modeling and network analysis techniques used are robust, there may be inherent biases or limitations in the underlying language models and algorithms that could impact the accuracy of the results.
Further research is needed to explore the role of platform design, algorithmic curation, and user behavior in amplifying or mitigating toxic content during crisis situations. Longitudinal studies could also shed light on how toxic narratives evolve over time and how effective interventions can be implemented.
Conclusion
This study offers a comprehensive analysis of the toxic online discourse surrounding the 2022 Mpox outbreak, providing valuable insights for crisis communication and policy-making. By tracking the topical dynamics and network patterns of toxicity, the researchers have highlighted the need for targeted interventions to address the central figures and influential users driving the spread of harmful content during public health emergencies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌐
0
Characterizing Online Toxicity During the 2022 Mpox Outbreak: A Computational Analysis of Topical and Network Dynamics
Lizhou Fan, Lingyao Li, Libby Hemphill
Background: Online toxicity, encompassing behaviors such as harassment, bullying, hate speech, and the dissemination of misinformation, has become a pressing social concern in the digital age. The 2022 Mpox outbreak, initially termed Monkeypox but subsequently renamed to mitigate associated stigmas and societal concerns, serves as a poignant backdrop to this issue. Objective: In this research, we undertake a comprehensive analysis of the toxic online discourse surrounding the 2022 Mpox outbreak. Our objective is to dissect its origins, characterize its nature and content, trace its dissemination patterns, and assess its broader societal implications, with the goal of providing insights that can inform strategies to mitigate such toxicity in future crises. Methods: We collected more than 1.6 million unique tweets and analyzed them from five dimensions, including context, extent, content, speaker, and intent. Utilizing BERT-based topic modeling and social network community clustering, we delineated the toxic dynamics on Twitter. Results: We identified five high-level topic categories in the toxic online discourse on Twitter, including disease (46.6%), health policy and healthcare (19.3%), homophobia (23.9%), politics (6.0%), and racism (4.1%). Through the toxicity diffusion networks of mentions, retweets, and the top users, we found that retweets of toxic content were widespread, while influential users rarely engaged with or countered this toxicity through retweets. Conclusions: By tracking topical dynamics, we can track the changing popularity of toxic content online, providing a better understanding of societal challenges. Network dynamics spotlight key social media influencers and their intents, indicating that addressing these central figures in toxic discourse can enhance crisis communication and inform policy-making.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Toxic Memes: A Survey of Computational Perspectives on the Detection and Explanation of Meme Toxicities
Delfina Sol Martinez Pandiani, Erik Tjong Kim Sang, Davide Ceolin
Internet memes, channels for humor, social commentary, and cultural expression, are increasingly used to spread toxic messages. Studies on the computational analyses of toxic memes have significantly grown over the past five years, and the only three surveys on computational toxic meme analysis cover only work published until 2022, leading to inconsistent terminology and unexplored trends. Our work fills this gap by surveying content-based computational perspectives on toxic memes, and reviewing key developments until early 2024. Employing the PRISMA methodology, we systematically extend the previously considered papers, achieving a threefold result. First, we survey 119 new papers, analyzing 158 computational works focused on content-based toxic meme analysis. We identify over 30 datasets used in toxic meme analysis and examine their labeling systems. Second, after observing the existence of unclear definitions of meme toxicity in computational works, we introduce a new taxonomy for categorizing meme toxicity types. We also note an expansion in computational tasks beyond the simple binary classification of memes as toxic or non-toxic, indicating a shift towards achieving a nuanced comprehension of toxicity. Third, we identify three content-based dimensions of meme toxicity under automatic study: target, intent, and conveyance tactics. We develop a framework illustrating the relationships between these dimensions and meme toxicities. The survey analyzes key challenges and recent trends, such as enhanced cross-modal reasoning, integrating expert and cultural knowledge, the demand for automatic toxicity explanations, and handling meme toxicity in low-resource languages. Also, it notes the rising use of Large Language Models (LLMs) and generative AI for detecting and generating toxic memes. Finally, it proposes pathways for advancing toxic meme detection and interpretation.
Read more6/12/2024
0
Characterization of Political Polarized Users Attacked by Language Toxicity on Twitter
Wentao Xu
Understanding the dynamics of language toxicity on social media is important for us to investigate the propagation of misinformation and the development of echo chambers for political scenarios such as U.S. presidential elections. Recent research has used large-scale data to investigate the dynamics across social media platforms. However, research on the toxicity dynamics is not enough. This study aims to provide a first exploration of the potential language toxicity flow among Left, Right and Center users. Specifically, we aim to examine whether Left users were easier to be attacked by language toxicity. In this study, more than 500M Twitter posts were examined. It was discovered that Left users received much more toxic replies than Right and Center users.
Read more7/18/2024
0
Analyzing Toxicity in Deep Conversations: A Reddit Case Study
Vigneshwaran Shankaran, Rajesh Sharma
Online social media has become increasingly popular in recent years due to its ease of access and ability to connect with others. One of social media's main draws is its anonymity, allowing users to share their thoughts and opinions without fear of judgment or retribution. This anonymity has also made social media prone to harmful content, which requires moderation to ensure responsible and productive use. Several methods using artificial intelligence have been employed to detect harmful content. However, conversation and contextual analysis of hate speech are still understudied. Most promising works only analyze a single text at a time rather than the conversation supporting it. In this work, we employ a tree-based approach to understand how users behave concerning toxicity in public conversation settings. To this end, we collect both the posts and the comment sections of the top 100 posts from 8 Reddit communities that allow profanity, totaling over 1 million responses. We find that toxic comments increase the likelihood of subsequent toxic comments being produced in online conversations. Our analysis also shows that immediate context plays a vital role in shaping a response rather than the original post. We also study the effect of consensual profanity and observe overlapping similarities with non-consensual profanity in terms of user behavior and patterns.
Read more4/12/2024