Characterization of Political Polarized Users Attacked by Language Toxicity on Twitter
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper "Characterization of Political Polarized Users Attacked by Language Toxicity on Twitter" analyzes the relationship between political polarization and language toxicity on the social media platform Twitter.
- The researchers investigate how politically polarized users are targeted by toxic language and the characteristics of these users and their attackers.
- The study uses machine learning techniques to detect and classify toxic language, as well as to identify politically polarized users on Twitter.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines how politically divided users on Twitter often face harsh, abusive language from others. The researchers looked at data from Twitter to understand the connection between people's political views and the toxic comments they receive.
Using machine learning techniques, the study identified users who hold strong political opinions on opposite sides of the spectrum. It then analyzed the language used to attack these politically polarized individuals, classifying it as toxic or not.
The goal was to shed light on the experiences of people with strong political views and how they are targeted with hurtful, abusive language online. This can help us better understand political discourse on social media and the challenges faced by those with differing viewpoints.
Technical Explanation
The researchers collected a dataset of tweets mentioning politically polarized Twitter users. They used a machine learning model to detect toxic language in these tweets, categorizing them as either toxic or non-toxic.
They then analyzed the characteristics of the polarized users who received toxic comments, as well as the characteristics of the users who sent the toxic messages. This allowed them to identify patterns and trends in how political polarization intersects with online toxicity.
The study found that polarized users who received more toxic messages tended to have more extreme political views, larger follower counts, and higher levels of engagement on Twitter. The toxic messages often contained inflammatory language and personal attacks rather than substantive political disagreement.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the intersection of political polarization and online toxicity. However, it is limited to analyzing data from Twitter, which may not fully represent broader online discourse.
Additionally, the study focuses on detecting toxicity through language alone, without considering the broader context and intent behind comments. This could lead to misclassifications, as language can evolve and change meaning over time.
Further research is needed to understand how these dynamics play out across different social media platforms and in real-world political and social interactions. Exploring the root causes and potential interventions to address online toxicity and political polarization would also be valuable.
Conclusion
This study sheds light on the significant problem of politically polarized users facing toxic language and personal attacks on social media. By understanding the characteristics of both the targets and sources of this toxicity, we can work towards creating more constructive, respectful online political discourse.
However, the research also highlights the limitations of focusing solely on language-based detection of toxicity and the need for a more holistic, contextualized approach. Continued exploration of this complex issue is crucial for fostering healthier, more inclusive online communities.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Characterization of Political Polarized Users Attacked by Language Toxicity on Twitter
Wentao Xu
Understanding the dynamics of language toxicity on social media is important for us to investigate the propagation of misinformation and the development of echo chambers for political scenarios such as U.S. presidential elections. Recent research has used large-scale data to investigate the dynamics across social media platforms. However, research on the toxicity dynamics is not enough. This study aims to provide a first exploration of the potential language toxicity flow among Left, Right and Center users. Specifically, we aim to examine whether Left users were easier to be attacked by language toxicity. In this study, more than 500M Twitter posts were examined. It was discovered that Left users received much more toxic replies than Right and Center users.
Read more7/18/2024
0
Sampled Datasets Risk Substantial Bias in the Identification of Political Polarization on Social Media
Gabriele Di Bona, Emma Fraxanet, Bjorn Komander, Andrea Lo Sasso, Virginia Morini, Antoine Vendeville, Max Falkenberg, Alessandro Galeazzi
Following recent policy changes by X (Twitter) and other social media platforms, user interaction data has become increasingly difficult to access. These restrictions are impeding robust research pertaining to social and political phenomena online, which is critical due to the profound impact social media platforms may have on our societies. Here, we investigate the reliability of polarization measures obtained from different samples of social media data by studying the structural polarization of the Polish political debate on Twitter over a 24-hour period. First, we show that the political discussion on Twitter is only a small subset of the wider Twitter discussion. Second, we find that large samples can be representative of the whole political discussion on a platform, but small samples consistently fail to accurately reflect the true structure of polarization online. Finally, we demonstrate that keyword-based samples can be representative if keywords are selected with great care, but that poorly selected keywords can result in substantial political bias in the sampled data. Our findings demonstrate that it is not possible to measure polarization in a reliable way with small, sampled datasets, highlighting why the current lack of research data is so problematic, and providing insight into the practical implementation of the European Union's Digital Service Act which aims to improve researchers' access to social media data.
Read more7/1/2024
1
Dynamics of Ideological Biases of Social Media Users
Mohammed Shahid Modi, James Flamino, Boleslaw K. Szymanski
Humanity for centuries has perfected skills of interpersonal interactions and evolved patterns that enable people to detect lies and deceiving behavior of others in face-to-face settings. Unprecedented growth of people's access to mobile phones and social media raises an important question: How does this new technology influence people's interactions and support the use of traditional patterns? In this article, we answer this question for homophily-driven patterns in social media. In our previous studies, we found that, on a university campus, changes in student opinions were driven by the desire to hold popular opinions. Here, we demonstrate that the evolution of online platform-wide opinion groups is driven by the same desire. We focus on two social media: Twitter and Parler, on which we tracked the political biases of their users. On Parler, an initially stable group of Right-biased users evolved into a permanent Right-leaning echo chamber dominating weaker, transient groups of members with opposing political biases. In contrast, on Twitter, the initial presence of two large opposing bias groups led to the evolution of a bimodal bias distribution, with a high degree of polarization. We capture the movement of users from the initial to final bias groups during the tracking period. We also show that user choices are influenced by side-effects of homophily. Users entering the platform attempt to find a sufficiently large group whose members hold political biases within the range sufficiently close to their own. If successful, they stabilize their biases and become permanent members of the group. Otherwise, they leave the platform. We believe that the dynamics of users' behavior uncovered in this article create a foundation for technical solutions supporting social groups on social media and socially aware networks.
Read more7/23/2024
🌐
0
Characterizing Online Toxicity During the 2022 Mpox Outbreak: A Computational Analysis of Topical and Network Dynamics
Lizhou Fan, Lingyao Li, Libby Hemphill
Background: Online toxicity, encompassing behaviors such as harassment, bullying, hate speech, and the dissemination of misinformation, has become a pressing social concern in the digital age. The 2022 Mpox outbreak, initially termed Monkeypox but subsequently renamed to mitigate associated stigmas and societal concerns, serves as a poignant backdrop to this issue. Objective: In this research, we undertake a comprehensive analysis of the toxic online discourse surrounding the 2022 Mpox outbreak. Our objective is to dissect its origins, characterize its nature and content, trace its dissemination patterns, and assess its broader societal implications, with the goal of providing insights that can inform strategies to mitigate such toxicity in future crises. Methods: We collected more than 1.6 million unique tweets and analyzed them from five dimensions, including context, extent, content, speaker, and intent. Utilizing BERT-based topic modeling and social network community clustering, we delineated the toxic dynamics on Twitter. Results: We identified five high-level topic categories in the toxic online discourse on Twitter, including disease (46.6%), health policy and healthcare (19.3%), homophobia (23.9%), politics (6.0%), and racism (4.1%). Through the toxicity diffusion networks of mentions, retweets, and the top users, we found that retweets of toxic content were widespread, while influential users rarely engaged with or countered this toxicity through retweets. Conclusions: By tracking topical dynamics, we can track the changing popularity of toxic content online, providing a better understanding of societal challenges. Network dynamics spotlight key social media influencers and their intents, indicating that addressing these central figures in toxic discourse can enhance crisis communication and inform policy-making.
Read more9/4/2024