ChartMimic: Evaluating LMM's Cross-Modal Reasoning Capability via Chart-to-Code Generation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Evaluates the cross-modal reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) through a new benchmark called ChartMimic
- Focuses on chart-to-code generation, where models must generate Python code to reproduce a given chart
- Aims to test LLMs' ability to understand and reason about visual data and translate it into a programmatic representation
Plain English Explanation
The research paper introduces a new benchmark called ChartMimic that evaluates the cross-modal reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). The key idea is to test how well these models can understand and reason about visual data, specifically charts, and then translate that understanding into a programmatic representation in the form of Python code.
The motivation behind this benchmark is to go beyond traditional language understanding tasks and assess the models' ability to engage in more complex, cross-modal reasoning. By tasking the models with generating code to reproduce a given chart, the researchers can better understand how well the models can comprehend and reason about the visual information and then express that understanding in a formal, programmatic way.
This type of cross-modal reasoning is an important capability for many real-world applications, such as data analysis, data visualization, and even programming assistants. If LLMs can effectively bridge the gap between visual information and code, it could lead to significant advancements in these areas.
Technical Explanation
The ChartMimic benchmark consists of a dataset of chart images paired with the corresponding Python code required to generate those charts. The dataset is curated from a variety of sources, including academic papers, blogs, and data visualization libraries.
The researchers evaluate several state-of-the-art LLMs, including GPT-3, T5, and PaLM, on their ability to generate the correct Python code given a chart image. The models are assessed on metrics such as code generation accuracy, code quality, and the ability to handle different chart types and complexity levels.
The results show that while the LLMs demonstrate some cross-modal reasoning capabilities, there is still room for improvement, particularly when it comes to generating high-quality, idiomatic code. The researchers also identify specific challenges, such as understanding chart legends, handling chart annotations, and translating visual concepts into programmatic logic.
Critical Analysis
The ChartMimic benchmark provides a valuable tool for assessing the cross-modal reasoning capabilities of LLMs, but it is important to recognize its limitations and potential issues.
One potential concern is the diversity and representativeness of the dataset. While the researchers have made efforts to curate a diverse set of charts, there may still be biases or gaps in the types of visualizations included. This could limit the generalizability of the findings and the ability to draw broader conclusions about the models' capabilities.
Additionally, the task of generating code to reproduce a chart may not fully capture the nuances of real-world data analysis and visualization workflows. In practice, data scientists and developers often engage in an iterative process of exploring, cleaning, and transforming data, before deciding on the appropriate visualizations. The ChartMimic benchmark does not directly address these broader aspects of the data analysis pipeline.
Further research could explore ways to expand the benchmark to better reflect the complexities of real-world data analysis and visualization tasks, potentially incorporating elements such as data preprocessing, interactive exploration, and the use of domain-specific libraries and frameworks.
Conclusion
The ChartMimic benchmark represents an important step forward in evaluating the cross-modal reasoning capabilities of large language models. By focusing on the task of chart-to-code generation, the researchers have developed a novel way to assess how well these models can bridge the gap between visual information and programmatic representation.
The insights gained from this research could have significant implications for the development of more capable data analysis and visualization tools, as well as programming assistants that can leverage both natural language and visual information. As the field of artificial intelligence continues to advance, benchmarks like ChartMimic will play a crucial role in driving progress and ensuring that these systems are equipped with the necessary cross-modal reasoning skills to tackle complex, real-world problems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
ChartMimic: Evaluating LMM's Cross-Modal Reasoning Capability via Chart-to-Code Generation
Chufan Shi, Cheng Yang, Yaxin Liu, Bo Shui, Junjie Wang, Mohan Jing, Linran Xu, Xinyu Zhu, Siheng Li, Yuxiang Zhang, Gongye Liu, Xiaomei Nie, Deng Cai, Yujiu Yang
We introduce a new benchmark, ChartMimic, aimed at assessing the visually-grounded code generation capabilities of large multimodal models (LMMs). ChartMimic utilizes information-intensive visual charts and textual instructions as inputs, requiring LMMs to generate the corresponding code for chart rendering. ChartMimic includes 1,000 human-curated (figure, instruction, code) triplets, which represent the authentic chart use cases found in scientific papers across various domains(e.g., Physics, Computer Science, Economics, etc). These charts span 18 regular types and 4 advanced types, diversifying into 191 subcategories. Furthermore, we propose multi-level evaluation metrics to provide an automatic and thorough assessment of the output code and the rendered charts. Unlike existing code generation benchmarks, ChartMimic places emphasis on evaluating LMMs' capacity to harmonize a blend of cognitive capabilities, encompassing visual understanding, code generation, and cross-modal reasoning. The evaluation of 3 proprietary models and 11 open-weight models highlights the substantial challenges posed by ChartMimic. Even the advanced GPT-4V, Claude-3-opus only achieve an average score of 73.2 and 53.7, respectively, indicating significant room for improvement. We anticipate that ChartMimic will inspire the development of LMMs, advancing the pursuit of artificial general intelligence.
Read more6/17/2024
🤔
0
MMC: Advancing Multimodal Chart Understanding with Large-scale Instruction Tuning
Fuxiao Liu, Xiaoyang Wang, Wenlin Yao, Jianshu Chen, Kaiqiang Song, Sangwoo Cho, Yaser Yacoob, Dong Yu
With the rapid development of large language models (LLMs) and their integration into large multimodal models (LMMs), there has been impressive progress in zero-shot completion of user-oriented vision-language tasks. However, a gap remains in the domain of chart image understanding due to the distinct abstract components in charts. To address this, we introduce a large-scale MultiModal Chart Instruction (textbf{MMC-Instruction}) dataset comprising 600k instances supporting diverse tasks and chart types. Leveraging this data, we develop MultiModal Chart Assistant (textbf{MMCA}), an LMM that achieves state-of-the-art performance on existing chart QA benchmarks. Recognizing the need for a comprehensive evaluation of LMM chart understanding, we also propose a MultiModal Chart Benchmark (textbf{MMC-Benchmark}), a comprehensive human-annotated benchmark with nine distinct tasks evaluating reasoning capabilities over charts. Extensive experiments on MMC-Benchmark reveal the limitations of existing LMMs on correctly interpreting charts, even for the most recent GPT-4V model. Our work provides an instruction-tuning methodology and benchmark to advance multimodal understanding of charts. Code and data are available at https://github.com/FuxiaoLiu/MMC.
Read more4/16/2024
0
ChartX & ChartVLM: A Versatile Benchmark and Foundation Model for Complicated Chart Reasoning
Renqiu Xia, Bo Zhang, Hancheng Ye, Xiangchao Yan, Qi Liu, Hongbin Zhou, Zijun Chen, Min Dou, Botian Shi, Junchi Yan, Yu Qiao
Recently, many versatile Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have emerged continuously. However, their capacity to query information depicted in visual charts and engage in reasoning based on the queried contents remains under-explored. In this paper, to comprehensively and rigorously benchmark the ability of the off-the-shelf MLLMs in the chart domain, we construct ChartX, a multi-modal evaluation set covering 18 chart types, 7 chart tasks, 22 disciplinary topics, and high-quality chart data. Besides, we develop ChartVLM to offer a new perspective on handling multi-modal tasks that strongly depend on interpretable patterns, such as reasoning tasks in the field of charts or geometric images. We evaluate the chart-related ability of mainstream MLLMs and our ChartVLM on the proposed ChartX evaluation set. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ChartVLM surpasses both versatile and chart-related large models, achieving results comparable to GPT-4V. We believe that our study can pave the way for further exploration in creating a more comprehensive chart evaluation set and developing more interpretable multi-modal models. Both ChartX and ChartVLM are available at: https://github.com/UniModal4Reasoning/ChartVLM
Read more9/12/2024
🤯
0
ChartBench: A Benchmark for Complex Visual Reasoning in Charts
Zhengzhuo Xu, Sinan Du, Yiyan Qi, Chengjin Xu, Chun Yuan, Jian Guo
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in image understanding and generation. However, current benchmarks fail to accurately evaluate the chart comprehension of MLLMs due to limited chart types and inappropriate metrics. To address this, we propose ChartBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to assess chart comprehension and data reliability through complex visual reasoning. ChartBench includes 42 categories, 66.6k charts, and 600k question-answer pairs. Notably, many charts lack data point annotations, which requires MLLMs to derive values similar to human understanding by leveraging inherent chart elements such as color, legends, and coordinate systems. We also design an enhanced evaluation metric, Acc+, to evaluate MLLMs without extensive manual or costly LLM-based evaluations. Furthermore, we propose two baselines based on the chain of thought and supervised fine-tuning to improve model performance on unannotated charts. Extensive experimental evaluations of 18 open-sourced and 3 proprietary MLLMs reveal their limitations in chart comprehension and offer valuable insights for further research. Code and dataset are publicly available at https://chartbench.github.io.
Read more6/21/2024