MMC: Advancing Multimodal Chart Understanding with Large-scale Instruction Tuning
2311.10774
0
0
š¤
Abstract
With the rapid development of large language models (LLMs) and their integration into large multimodal models (LMMs), there has been impressive progress in zero-shot completion of user-oriented vision-language tasks. However, a gap remains in the domain of chart image understanding due to the distinct abstract components in charts. To address this, we introduce a large-scale MultiModal Chart Instruction (textbf{MMC-Instruction}) dataset comprising 600k instances supporting diverse tasks and chart types. Leveraging this data, we develop MultiModal Chart Assistant (textbf{MMCA}), an LMM that achieves state-of-the-art performance on existing chart QA benchmarks. Recognizing the need for a comprehensive evaluation of LMM chart understanding, we also propose a MultiModal Chart Benchmark (textbf{MMC-Benchmark}), a comprehensive human-annotated benchmark with nine distinct tasks evaluating reasoning capabilities over charts. Extensive experiments on MMC-Benchmark reveal the limitations of existing LMMs on correctly interpreting charts, even for the most recent GPT-4V model. Our work provides an instruction-tuning methodology and benchmark to advance multimodal understanding of charts. Code and data are available at https://github.com/FuxiaoLiu/MMC.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Rapid development of large language models (LLMs) and their integration into large multimodal models (LMMs) have led to impressive progress in zero-shot completion of user-oriented vision-language tasks.
- However, a gap remains in the domain of chart image understanding due to the distinct abstract components in charts.
- To address this, the authors introduce a large-scale MultiModal Chart Instruction (MMC-Instruction) dataset comprising 600k instances supporting diverse tasks and chart types.
- Leveraging this data, the authors develop MultiModal Chart Assistant (MMCA), an LMM that achieves state-of-the-art performance on existing chart QA benchmarks.
- The authors also propose a MultiModal Chart Benchmark (MMC-Benchmark), a comprehensive human-annotated benchmark with nine distinct tasks evaluating reasoning capabilities over charts.
- Extensive experiments on MMC-Benchmark reveal the limitations of existing LLMs on correctly interpreting charts, even for the most recent GPT-4V model.
Plain English Explanation
The rapid progress in large language models (LLMs) and their integration into larger multimodal models (LMMs) has led to impressive results in various vision-language tasks. However, one area where these models still struggle is in understanding and reasoning about chart images. Charts often contain abstract and complex visual elements, making them challenging for current LMMs to interpret correctly.
To address this gap, the researchers created a large dataset called MultiModal Chart Instruction (MMC-Instruction), which contains over 600,000 examples of different chart types and tasks. Using this dataset, they developed a new multimodal model called MultiModal Chart Assistant (MMCA) that can better understand and reason about charts compared to existing models.
To thoroughly evaluate the chart understanding capabilities of LLMs, the researchers also created a comprehensive MultiModal Chart Benchmark (MMC-Benchmark) with nine different tasks. When tested on this benchmark, even the latest model like GPT-4V struggled to correctly interpret the information in the charts, revealing the limitations of current LLMs in this domain.
Overall, this research highlights the need for better multimodal models that can understand and reason about complex visual information, like the abstract components found in charts. The datasets and benchmarks developed in this study can help drive progress in this important area of multimodal machine learning and geometric problem solving.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a large-scale MultiModal Chart Instruction (MMC-Instruction) dataset comprising 600k instances that support diverse tasks and chart types. This dataset is designed to address the gap in chart image understanding that exists despite the impressive progress in zero-shot completion of user-oriented vision-language tasks using large language models (LLMs) and their integration into large multimodal models (LMMs).
Leveraging the MMC-Instruction dataset, the authors develop a MultiModal Chart Assistant (MMCA) model, which is an LMM that achieves state-of-the-art performance on existing chart QA benchmarks.
To provide a comprehensive evaluation of LMM chart understanding, the researchers also propose a MultiModal Chart Benchmark (MMC-Benchmark), a human-annotated benchmark with nine distinct tasks that assess the reasoning capabilities of models over charts. Extensive experiments on the MMC-Benchmark reveal the limitations of existing LLMs, including the recent GPT-4V model, in correctly interpreting the information contained in charts.
Critical Analysis
The research presented in this paper highlights the important need for improving multimodal understanding, particularly in the domain of chart image interpretation. The authors have made valuable contributions by introducing a large-scale dataset and a comprehensive benchmark to drive progress in this area.
One potential limitation of the study is the reliance on human-annotated data for the MMC-Benchmark. While this approach ensures the ground truth for the evaluation, it may also introduce some biases or inconsistencies in the annotations. It would be interesting to see if the model's performance could be further improved by incorporating other types of data or leveraging unsupervised learning techniques.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the specific types of errors or misunderstandings that the LLMs exhibit when interpreting charts. A deeper exploration of the model's failure modes and the underlying reasons could provide valuable insights for future research and development.
Furthermore, the study focuses on evaluating the chart understanding capabilities of LLMs, but it would be interesting to see how other modalities, such as structured data or textual descriptions, could be integrated to enhance the multimodal understanding of charts. Incorporating additional information sources may lead to more robust and comprehensive chart interpretation.
Overall, the research presented in this paper is a valuable contribution to the field of multimodal machine learning and geometric problem solving. The datasets and benchmarks developed in this study can serve as important resources for the research community to advance the state-of-the-art in chart understanding and multimodal reasoning.
Conclusion
This paper addresses the critical gap in the domain of chart image understanding, which remains a challenge for even the most advanced large language models (LLMs) and their multimodal counterparts (LMMs). By introducing a large-scale MultiModal Chart Instruction (MMC-Instruction) dataset and developing a MultiModal Chart Assistant (MMCA) model, the researchers have made significant progress in addressing this challenge.
Furthermore, the MultiModal Chart Benchmark (MMC-Benchmark) proposed in this study provides a comprehensive and human-annotated evaluation platform to assess the reasoning capabilities of multimodal models over charts. The insights gained from this research can inform the development of more robust and capable multimodal machine learning systems, with broader implications for geometric problem solving and other domains that rely on the interpretation of complex visual information.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
ChartMimic: Evaluating LMM's Cross-Modal Reasoning Capability via Chart-to-Code Generation
Chufan Shi, Cheng Yang, Yaxin Liu, Bo Shui, Junjie Wang, Mohan Jing, Linran Xu, Xinyu Zhu, Siheng Li, Yuxiang Zhang, Gongye Liu, Xiaomei Nie, Deng Cai, Yujiu Yang
0
0
We introduce a new benchmark, ChartMimic, aimed at assessing the visually-grounded code generation capabilities of large multimodal models (LMMs). ChartMimic utilizes information-intensive visual charts and textual instructions as inputs, requiring LMMs to generate the corresponding code for chart rendering. ChartMimic includes 1,000 human-curated (figure, instruction, code) triplets, which represent the authentic chart use cases found in scientific papers across various domains(e.g., Physics, Computer Science, Economics, etc). These charts span 18 regular types and 4 advanced types, diversifying into 191 subcategories. Furthermore, we propose multi-level evaluation metrics to provide an automatic and thorough assessment of the output code and the rendered charts. Unlike existing code generation benchmarks, ChartMimic places emphasis on evaluating LMMs' capacity to harmonize a blend of cognitive capabilities, encompassing visual understanding, code generation, and cross-modal reasoning. The evaluation of 3 proprietary models and 11 open-weight models highlights the substantial challenges posed by ChartMimic. Even the advanced GPT-4V, Claude-3-opus only achieve an average score of 73.2 and 53.7, respectively, indicating significant room for improvement. We anticipate that ChartMimic will inspire the development of LMMs, advancing the pursuit of artificial general intelligence.
6/17/2024
mChartQA: A universal benchmark for multimodal Chart Question Answer based on Vision-Language Alignment and Reasoning
Jingxuan Wei, Nan Xu, Guiyong Chang, Yin Luo, BiHui Yu, Ruifeng Guo
0
0
In the fields of computer vision and natural language processing, multimodal chart question-answering, especially involving color, structure, and textless charts, poses significant challenges. Traditional methods, which typically involve either direct multimodal processing or a table-to-text conversion followed by language model analysis, have limitations in effectively handling these complex scenarios. This paper introduces a novel multimodal chart question-answering model, specifically designed to address these intricate tasks. Our model integrates visual and linguistic processing, overcoming the constraints of existing methods. We adopt a dual-phase training approach: the initial phase focuses on aligning image and text representations, while the subsequent phase concentrates on optimizing the model's interpretative and analytical abilities in chart-related queries. This approach has demonstrated superior performance on multiple public datasets, particularly in handling color, structure, and textless chart questions, indicating its effectiveness in complex multimodal tasks.
4/3/2024
š¤Æ
ChartBench: A Benchmark for Complex Visual Reasoning in Charts
Zhengzhuo Xu, Sinan Du, Yiyan Qi, Chengjin Xu, Chun Yuan, Jian Guo
0
0
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in image understanding and generation. However, current benchmarks fail to accurately evaluate the chart comprehension of MLLMs due to limited chart types and inappropriate metrics. To address this, we propose ChartBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to assess chart comprehension and data reliability through complex visual reasoning. ChartBench includes 42 categories, 66.6k charts, and 600k question-answer pairs. Notably, many charts lack data point annotations, which requires MLLMs to derive values similar to human understanding by leveraging inherent chart elements such as color, legends, and coordinate systems. We also design an enhanced evaluation metric, Acc+, to evaluate MLLMs without extensive manual or costly LLM-based evaluations. Furthermore, we propose two baselines based on the chain of thought and supervised fine-tuning to improve model performance on unannotated charts. Extensive experimental evaluations of 18 open-sourced and 3 proprietary MLLMs reveal their limitations in chart comprehension and offer valuable insights for further research. Code and dataset are publicly available at https://chartbench.github.io.
6/21/2024
š¤
CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs
Zirui Wang, Mengzhou Xia, Luxi He, Howard Chen, Yitao Liu, Richard Zhu, Kaiqu Liang, Xindi Wu, Haotian Liu, Sadhika Malladi, Alexis Chevalier, Sanjeev Arora, Danqi Chen
0
0
Chart understanding plays a pivotal role when applying Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to real-world tasks such as analyzing scientific papers or financial reports. However, existing datasets often focus on oversimplified and homogeneous charts with template-based questions, leading to an over-optimistic measure of progress. We demonstrate that although open-source models can appear to outperform strong proprietary models on these benchmarks, a simple stress test with slightly different charts or questions can deteriorate performance by up to 34.5%. In this work, we propose CharXiv, a comprehensive evaluation suite involving 2,323 natural, challenging, and diverse charts from arXiv papers. CharXiv includes two types of questions: 1) descriptive questions about examining basic chart elements and 2) reasoning questions that require synthesizing information across complex visual elements in the chart. To ensure quality, all charts and questions are handpicked, curated, and verified by human experts. Our results reveal a substantial, previously underestimated gap between the reasoning skills of the strongest proprietary model (i.e., GPT-4o), which achieves 47.1% accuracy, and the strongest open-source model (i.e., InternVL Chat V1.5), which achieves 29.2%. All models lag far behind human performance of 80.5%, underscoring weaknesses in the chart understanding capabilities of existing MLLMs. We hope CharXiv facilitates future research on MLLM chart understanding by providing a more realistic and faithful measure of progress. Project page and leaderboard: https://charxiv.github.io/
6/27/2024