ChatBCG: Can AI Read Your Slide Deck?

Read original: arXiv:2407.12875 - Published 7/19/2024 by Nikita Singh, Rob Balian, Lukas Martinelli
Total Score

3

ChatBCG: Can AI Read Your Slide Deck?

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper evaluates the ability of multimodal language models to accurately extract information from charts and visualizations in slide decks.
  • The researchers tested models like ChatGPT-4 and FlowLearn on their ability to answer questions about charts and data visualizations.
  • The goal was to assess how well these AI models can "read" and understand the content of visual elements in presentation slides, which is an important skill for many real-world applications.

Plain English Explanation

Multimodal language models are a type of AI that can process both text and visual information. The researchers wanted to test how well these models can interpret charts, graphs, and other data visualizations that are commonly included in presentation slides.

They asked the models questions about the content and meaning of various visualizations, to see if the AI could accurately "read" and understand the information being conveyed. This is an important capability, as being able to extract insights from visual data is crucial for many business, research, and analytical tasks.

The findings provide insights into the current strengths and limitations of state-of-the-art multimodal AI models when it comes to interpreting visual elements. This can help guide the development of more advanced AI systems that can seamlessly work with both textual and graphical information.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a series of experiments to evaluate the performance of multimodal language models on a task-based assessment of chart and visualization understanding. They used several well-known models, including ChatGPT-4, FlowLearn, and others, and tested them on their ability to answer questions about the content and meaning of various data visualizations.

The experiments involved presenting the models with slide decks containing charts, graphs, and other visual elements, and then asking them specific questions about the information being conveyed. The researchers assessed the models' responses for accuracy, as well as their ability to provide relevant and informative explanations.

The results showed that while the models performed reasonably well on some tasks, they also exhibited significant limitations in their ability to fully comprehend and reason about the visual data. The paper discusses the implications of these findings for the development of more advanced multimodal AI systems that can seamlessly integrate textual and visual information.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and rigorous evaluation of the current state of multimodal language models when it comes to understanding and reasoning about data visualizations. The researchers have designed a thoughtful experimental setup that allows for a detailed assessment of the models' capabilities.

However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and caveats. For example, the test set may not fully capture the diversity of real-world visualization types and use cases, and the evaluation metrics may not capture all aspects of visual understanding. Additionally, the paper does not delve into the specific architectural choices or training approaches of the models, which could provide valuable insights into the sources of their strengths and weaknesses.

Further research could explore the impact of different model architectures, training data, and fine-tuning strategies on the visual understanding capabilities of multimodal language models. Investigating how these models handle more complex or interactive visualizations, or how they perform on tasks that require deeper reasoning about the underlying data, could also yield important insights.

Conclusion

This paper offers a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to develop AI systems that can seamlessly integrate and reason about both textual and visual information. The findings highlight the current limitations of state-of-the-art multimodal language models when it comes to understanding and extracting insights from data visualizations, which is an important skill for many real-world applications.

The insights from this research can help guide the development of more advanced AI models that can better comprehend and reason about visual data, ultimately paving the way for more powerful and versatile AI-powered tools for analysis, decision-making, and knowledge sharing across a wide range of domains.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

ChatBCG: Can AI Read Your Slide Deck?
Total Score

3

ChatBCG: Can AI Read Your Slide Deck?

Nikita Singh, Rob Balian, Lukas Martinelli

Multimodal models like GPT4o and Gemini Flash are exceptional at inference and summarization tasks, which approach human-level in performance. However, we find that these models underperform compared to humans when asked to do very specific 'reading and estimation' tasks, particularly in the context of visual charts in business decks. This paper evaluates the accuracy of GPT 4o and Gemini Flash-1.5 in answering straightforward questions about data on labeled charts (where data is clearly annotated on the graphs), and unlabeled charts (where data is not clearly annotated and has to be inferred from the X and Y axis). We conclude that these models aren't currently capable of reading a deck accurately end-to-end if it contains any complex or unlabeled charts. Even if a user created a deck of only labeled charts, the model would only be able to read 7-8 out of 15 labeled charts perfectly end-to-end. For full list of slide deck figures visit https://www.repromptai.com/chat_bcg

Read more

7/19/2024

🔗

Total Score

0

Evaluating Task-based Effectiveness of MLLMs on Charts

Yifan Wu, Lutao Yan, Yuyu Luo, Yunhai Wang, Nan Tang

In this paper, we explore a forward-thinking question: Is GPT-4V effective at low-level data analysis tasks on charts? To this end, we first curate a large-scale dataset, named ChartInsights, consisting of 89,388 quartets (chart, task, question, answer) and covering 10 widely-used low-level data analysis tasks on 7 chart types. Firstly, we conduct systematic evaluations to understand the capabilities and limitations of 18 advanced MLLMs, which include 12 open-source models and 6 closed-source models. Starting with a standard textual prompt approach, the average accuracy rate across the 18 MLLMs is 36.17%. Among all the models, GPT-4V achieves the highest accuracy, reaching 56.13%. To understand the limitations of multimodal large models in low-level data analysis tasks, we have designed various experiments to conduct an in-depth test of capabilities of GPT-4V. We further investigate how visual modifications to charts, such as altering visual elements (e.g. changing color schemes) and introducing perturbations (e.g. adding image noise), affect performance of GPT-4V. Secondly, we present 12 experimental findings. These findings suggest potential of GPT-4V to revolutionize interaction with charts and uncover the gap between human analytic needs and capabilities of GPT-4V. Thirdly, we propose a novel textual prompt strategy, named Chain-of-Charts, tailored for low-level analysis tasks, which boosts model performance by 24.36%, resulting in an accuracy of 80.49%. Furthermore, by incorporating a visual prompt strategy that directs attention of GPT-4V to question-relevant visual elements, we further improve accuracy to 83.83%. Our study not only sheds light on the capabilities and limitations of GPT-4V in low-level data analysis tasks but also offers valuable insights for future research.

Read more

6/18/2024

👀

Total Score

0

Evaluating ChatGPT-4 Vision on Brazil's National Undergraduate Computer Science Exam

Nabor C. Mendonc{c}a

The recent integration of visual capabilities into Large Language Models (LLMs) has the potential to play a pivotal role in science and technology education, where visual elements such as diagrams, charts, and tables are commonly used to improve the learning experience. This study investigates the performance of ChatGPT-4 Vision, OpenAI's most advanced visual model at the time the study was conducted, on the Bachelor in Computer Science section of Brazil's 2021 National Undergraduate Exam (ENADE). By presenting the model with the exam's open and multiple-choice questions in their original image format and allowing for reassessment in response to differing answer keys, we were able to evaluate the model's reasoning and self-reflecting capabilities in a large-scale academic assessment involving textual and visual content. ChatGPT-4 Vision significantly outperformed the average exam participant, positioning itself within the top 10 best score percentile. While it excelled in questions that incorporated visual elements, it also encountered challenges with question interpretation, logical reasoning, and visual acuity. The involvement of an independent expert panel to review cases of disagreement between the model and the answer key revealed some poorly constructed questions containing vague or ambiguous statements, calling attention to the critical need for improved question design in future exams. Our findings suggest that while ChatGPT-4 Vision shows promise in multimodal academic evaluations, human oversight remains crucial for verifying the model's accuracy and ensuring the fairness of high-stakes educational exams. The paper's research materials are publicly available at https://github.com/nabormendonca/gpt-4v-enade-cs-2021.

Read more

6/17/2024

📉

Total Score

0

How Good is ChatGPT in Giving Advice on Your Visualization Design?

Nam Wook Kim, Grace Myers, Benjamin Bach

Data visualization practitioners often lack formal training, resulting in a knowledge gap in visualization design best practices. Large-language models like ChatGPT, with their vast internet-scale training data, offer transformative potential in addressing this gap. To explore this potential, we adopted a mixed-method approach. Initially, we analyzed the VisGuide forum, a repository of data visualization questions, by comparing ChatGPT-generated responses to human replies. Subsequently, our user study delved into practitioners' reactions and attitudes toward ChatGPT as a visualization assistant. Participants, who brought their visualizations and questions, received feedback from both human experts and ChatGPT in a randomized order. They filled out experience surveys and shared deeper insights through post-interviews. The results highlight the unique advantages and disadvantages of ChatGPT, such as its ability to quickly provide a wide range of design options based on a broad knowledge base, while also revealing its limitations in terms of depth and critical thinking capabilities.

Read more

5/2/2024