ClaimVer: Explainable Claim-Level Verification and Evidence Attribution of Text Through Knowledge Graphs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces ClaimVer, a system for verifying claims and attributing evidence from text using knowledge graphs.
- ClaimVer aims to provide explainable claim verification by identifying relevant evidence from external sources and assessing the plausibility of claims based on that evidence.
- The system leverages a knowledge graph to ground claims and evidence, allowing it to reason about the semantics and relationships between concepts.
Plain English Explanation
ClaimVer is a tool that helps determine whether claims made in text are true or false. It does this by finding relevant evidence from other sources and using that information to evaluate the plausibility of the claim.
The key innovation of ClaimVer is that it uses a knowledge graph - a structured database of concepts and how they are related - to understand the meaning and connections between the claim and the supporting evidence. This allows the system to reason about the semantics in a more sophisticated way than just looking for keyword matches.
For example, if a claim is made that "elephants are mammals," ClaimVer could find evidence in a knowledge graph that confirms elephants are classified as part of the mammal family. It could then use this evidence to conclude that the claim is likely true. The system can also identify cases where the available evidence contradicts or casts doubt on a claim.
By grounding the verification process in a knowledge graph, ClaimVer aims to provide explanations for its decisions, rather than just returning a binary true/false verdict. This transparency is important for building trust in the system's outputs and allowing users to understand the reasoning behind the claim assessments.
Technical Explanation
ClaimVer takes a claim as input and retrieves relevant evidence from a knowledge graph to assess its plausibility. The key components of the system include:
-
Claim Grounding: ClaimVer first maps the entities and relationships mentioned in the claim to corresponding concepts and relations in the knowledge graph. This allows the system to understand the semantics of the claim in a structured way.
-
Evidence Retrieval: The system then searches the knowledge graph to find related concepts and statements that could serve as evidence for or against the claim. This evidence is retrieved based on measures of relevance and semantic similarity.
-
Claim Verification: ClaimVer's verification module takes the grounded claim and the retrieved evidence, and uses reasoning algorithms to determine the overall plausibility of the claim. This includes assessing the strength, reliability, and coherence of the evidence.
-
Explanation Generation: Finally, the system generates natural language explanations to justify its claim verification decisions. These explanations highlight the key evidence used and the logical steps behind the assessment.
The authors evaluate ClaimVer on a dataset of claims from Wikipedia and fact-checking websites. The results show that the system can effectively verify claims and provide interpretable explanations, outperforming baseline approaches that do not leverage structured knowledge.
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge several limitations of the ClaimVer approach. First, the system's performance is heavily dependent on the coverage and quality of the underlying knowledge graph. Gaps or inaccuracies in the knowledge base could lead to incomplete or incorrect evidence retrieval and verification.
Additionally, the current implementation of ClaimVer is focused on verifying claims expressed as simple factual statements. More complex or nuanced claims, such as those involving opinions, values, or implicit assumptions, may be more challenging for the system to handle.
Further research could explore ways to expand the types of claims that ClaimVer can handle, as well as investigate techniques for automatically curating and maintaining the knowledge graph to improve coverage and reliability. Incorporating additional sources of evidence, such as web pages or databases, could also enhance the system's claim verification capabilities.
Overall, the ClaimVer approach represents a promising step towards building more explainable and trustworthy claim verification systems. By grounding the verification process in structured knowledge, the system can provide users with insights into its decision-making, which is an important consideration for real-world applications.
Conclusion
The ClaimVer system introduces a novel approach to claim verification that leverages knowledge graphs to provide explanations for its assessments. By mapping claims and evidence to a structured knowledge base, the system can reason about the semantics and relationships between concepts in a way that goes beyond simple keyword matching.
The authors' evaluation demonstrates the potential of this approach, showing that ClaimVer can effectively verify claims and generate interpretable explanations. While the current system has some limitations, the general principles behind ClaimVer could be further developed and applied to a wide range of text-based claim verification tasks, with important implications for fields like journalism, fact-checking, and scientific communication.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
ClaimVer: Explainable Claim-Level Verification and Evidence Attribution of Text Through Knowledge Graphs
Preetam Prabhu Srikar Dammu, Himanshu Naidu, Mouly Dewan, YoungMin Kim, Tanya Roosta, Aman Chadha, Chirag Shah
In the midst of widespread misinformation and disinformation through social media and the proliferation of AI-generated texts, it has become increasingly difficult for people to validate and trust information they encounter. Many fact-checking approaches and tools have been developed, but they often lack appropriate explainability or granularity to be useful in various contexts. A text validation method that is easy to use, accessible, and can perform fine-grained evidence attribution has become crucial. More importantly, building user trust in such a method requires presenting the rationale behind each prediction, as research shows this significantly influences people's belief in automated systems. Localizing and bringing users' attention to the specific problematic content is also paramount, instead of providing simple blanket labels. In this paper, we present ClaimVer, a human-centric framework tailored to meet users' informational and verification needs by generating rich annotations and thereby reducing cognitive load. Designed to deliver comprehensive evaluations of texts, it highlights each claim, verifies it against a trusted knowledge graph (KG), presents the evidence, and provides succinct, clear explanations for each claim prediction. Finally, our framework introduces an attribution score, enhancing applicability across a wide range of downstream tasks.
Read more8/22/2024
0
Fact or Fiction? Improving Fact Verification with Knowledge Graphs through Simplified Subgraph Retrievals
Tobias A. Opsahl
Despite recent success in natural language processing (NLP), fact verification still remains a difficult task. Due to misinformation spreading increasingly fast, attention has been directed towards automatically verifying the correctness of claims. In the domain of NLP, this is usually done by training supervised machine learning models to verify claims by utilizing evidence from trustworthy corpora. We present efficient methods for verifying claims on a dataset where the evidence is in the form of structured knowledge graphs. We use the FactKG dataset, which is constructed from the DBpedia knowledge graph extracted from Wikipedia. By simplifying the evidence retrieval process, from fine-tuned language models to simple logical retrievals, we are able to construct models that both require less computational resources and achieve better test-set accuracy.
Read more8/15/2024
📈
0
A Knowledge Enhanced Learning and Semantic Composition Model for Multi-Claim Fact Checking
Shuai Wang, Penghui Wei, Qingchao Kong, Wenji Mao
To inhibit the spread of rumorous information and its severe consequences, traditional fact checking aims at retrieving relevant evidence to verify the veracity of a given claim. Fact checking methods typically use knowledge graphs (KGs) as external repositories and develop reasoning mechanism to retrieve evidence for verifying the triple claim. However, existing methods only focus on verifying a single claim. As real-world rumorous information is more complex and a textual statement is often composed of multiple clauses (i.e. represented as multiple claims instead of a single one), multiclaim fact checking is not only necessary but more important for practical applications. Although previous methods for verifying a single triple can be applied repeatedly to verify multiple triples one by one, they ignore the contextual information implied in a multi-claim statement and could not learn the rich semantic information in the statement as a whole. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end knowledge enhanced learning and verification method for multi-claim fact checking. Our method consists of two modules, KG-based learning enhancement and multi-claim semantic composition. To fully utilize the contextual information, the KG-based learning enhancement module learns the dynamic context-specific representations via selectively aggregating relevant attributes of entities. To capture the compositional semantics of multiple triples, the multi-claim semantic composition module constructs the graph structure to model claim-level interactions, and integrates global and salient local semantics with multi-head attention. Experimental results on a real-world dataset and two benchmark datasets show the effectiveness of our method for multi-claim fact checking over KG.
Read more7/30/2024
0
KGV: Integrating Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs for Cyber Threat Intelligence Credibility Assessment
Zongzong Wu, Fengxiao Tang, Ming Zhao, Yufeng Li
Cyber threat intelligence is a critical tool that many organizations and individuals use to protect themselves from sophisticated, organized, persistent, and weaponized cyber attacks. However, few studies have focused on the quality assessment of threat intelligence provided by intelligence platforms, and this work still requires manual analysis by cybersecurity experts. In this paper, we propose a knowledge graph-based verifier, a novel Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) quality assessment framework that combines knowledge graphs and Large Language Models (LLMs). Our approach introduces LLMs to automatically extract OSCTI key claims to be verified and utilizes a knowledge graph consisting of paragraphs for fact-checking. This method differs from the traditional way of constructing complex knowledge graphs with entities as nodes. By constructing knowledge graphs with paragraphs as nodes and semantic similarity as edges, it effectively enhances the semantic understanding ability of the model and simplifies labeling requirements. Additionally, to fill the gap in the research field, we created and made public the first dataset for threat intelligence assessment from heterogeneous sources. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to create a dataset on threat intelligence reliability verification, providing a reference for future research. Experimental results show that KGV (Knowledge Graph Verifier) significantly improves the performance of LLMs in intelligence quality assessment. Compared with traditional methods, we reduce a large amount of data annotation while the model still exhibits strong reasoning capabilities. Finally, our method can achieve XXX accuracy in network threat assessment.
Read more8/16/2024