KGV: Integrating Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs for Cyber Threat Intelligence Credibility Assessment
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Integrates large language models with knowledge graphs for cyber threat intelligence credibility assessment
- Aims to improve the accuracy and reliability of cyber threat information by combining the strengths of language models and structured knowledge
- Develops a novel "Knowledge Graph Verification" (KGV) model that leverages both textual and structured information
Plain English Explanation
Large language models have shown impressive capabilities in understanding and generating human-like text. However, they can sometimes produce inaccurate or biased information, especially when it comes to specialized domains like cybersecurity.
On the other hand, knowledge graphs are structured representations of real-world entities and their relationships, which can provide a more reliable and comprehensive understanding of a subject.
This paper presents a novel approach called "Knowledge Graph Verification" (KGV) that combines the strengths of large language models and knowledge graphs to assess the credibility of cyber threat intelligence. The key idea is to use the language model to extract relevant information from text, and then verify and augment that information using a knowledge graph.
For example, if the language model identifies a potential cyber threat, the KGV model can check that information against a knowledge graph of known cyber threats, vulnerabilities, and attack techniques. This can help identify inaccuracies or inconsistencies, and provide a more holistic assessment of the threat's credibility.
By integrating these two powerful AI technologies, the researchers aim to improve the accuracy and reliability of cyber threat intelligence, which is crucial for organizations to defend against evolving cyber threats.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a Knowledge Graph Verification (KGV) model that leverages both large language models and knowledge graphs for cyber threat intelligence credibility assessment.
The model consists of three main components:
-
Text Encoder: A large language model (e.g., BERT) is used to encode the input text and extract relevant information.
-
Knowledge Graph Encoder: A separate encoder is used to represent the entities and relationships in the knowledge graph.
-
Verification Module: This module combines the text and knowledge graph representations to assess the credibility of the cyber threat information.
The key innovation is the way the model integrates the text-based and structured knowledge representations. The verification module learns to identify inconsistencies or conflicts between the information extracted from the text and the knowledge graph, and uses this to determine the overall credibility of the threat intelligence.
The researchers evaluated the KGV model on a dataset of cyber threat reports, and found that it outperformed both language model-only and knowledge graph-only approaches in terms of accurately assessing the credibility of the threat information.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to leveraging the complementary strengths of large language models and knowledge graphs for a critical real-world problem. The integrated architecture seems well-designed and the experimental results are promising.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations or areas for further research. For example, the performance of the KGV model may be sensitive to the quality and coverage of the underlying knowledge graph. Maintaining an up-to-date and comprehensive knowledge graph for the rapidly evolving cybersecurity domain could be challenging.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss how the KGV model might handle conflicting or ambiguous information, where the text-based and structured knowledge representations disagree. Resolving such conflicts in a principled way could be an important area for future work.
Overall, the KGV approach is a valuable contribution to the field of cyber threat intelligence and merits further exploration and refinement.
Conclusion
The "Knowledge Graph Verification" (KGV) model presented in this paper offers a promising approach to improving the credibility assessment of cyber threat intelligence by integrating large language models and knowledge graphs.
By leveraging the strengths of both text-based and structured knowledge representations, the KGV model can more accurately identify accurate and reliable cyber threat information, which is crucial for organizations to defend against evolving cyber threats.
While the paper highlights some limitations that warrant further research, the overall KGV approach represents an important step forward in synergizing knowledge graphs and large language models to enhance domain expertise and improve real-world decision-making.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
KGV: Integrating Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs for Cyber Threat Intelligence Credibility Assessment
Zongzong Wu, Fengxiao Tang, Ming Zhao, Yufeng Li
Cyber threat intelligence is a critical tool that many organizations and individuals use to protect themselves from sophisticated, organized, persistent, and weaponized cyber attacks. However, few studies have focused on the quality assessment of threat intelligence provided by intelligence platforms, and this work still requires manual analysis by cybersecurity experts. In this paper, we propose a knowledge graph-based verifier, a novel Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) quality assessment framework that combines knowledge graphs and Large Language Models (LLMs). Our approach introduces LLMs to automatically extract OSCTI key claims to be verified and utilizes a knowledge graph consisting of paragraphs for fact-checking. This method differs from the traditional way of constructing complex knowledge graphs with entities as nodes. By constructing knowledge graphs with paragraphs as nodes and semantic similarity as edges, it effectively enhances the semantic understanding ability of the model and simplifies labeling requirements. Additionally, to fill the gap in the research field, we created and made public the first dataset for threat intelligence assessment from heterogeneous sources. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to create a dataset on threat intelligence reliability verification, providing a reference for future research. Experimental results show that KGV (Knowledge Graph Verifier) significantly improves the performance of LLMs in intelligence quality assessment. Compared with traditional methods, we reduce a large amount of data annotation while the model still exhibits strong reasoning capabilities. Finally, our method can achieve XXX accuracy in network threat assessment.
Read more8/16/2024
0
Actionable Cyber Threat Intelligence using Knowledge Graphs and Large Language Models
Romy Fieblinger, Md Tanvirul Alam, Nidhi Rastogi
Cyber threats are constantly evolving. Extracting actionable insights from unstructured Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) data is essential to guide cybersecurity decisions. Increasingly, organizations like Microsoft, Trend Micro, and CrowdStrike are using generative AI to facilitate CTI extraction. This paper addresses the challenge of automating the extraction of actionable CTI using advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Knowledge Graphs (KGs). We explore the application of state-of-the-art open-source LLMs, including the Llama 2 series, Mistral 7B Instruct, and Zephyr for extracting meaningful triples from CTI texts. Our methodology evaluates techniques such as prompt engineering, the guidance framework, and fine-tuning to optimize information extraction and structuring. The extracted data is then utilized to construct a KG, offering a structured and queryable representation of threat intelligence. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in extracting relevant information, with guidance and fine-tuning showing superior performance over prompt engineering. However, while our methods prove effective in small-scale tests, applying LLMs to large-scale data for KG construction and Link Prediction presents ongoing challenges.
Read more7/4/2024
💬
0
AttacKG+:Boosting Attack Knowledge Graph Construction with Large Language Models
Yongheng Zhang, Tingwen Du, Yunshan Ma, Xiang Wang, Yi Xie, Guozheng Yang, Yuliang Lu, Ee-Chien Chang
Attack knowledge graph construction seeks to convert textual cyber threat intelligence (CTI) reports into structured representations, portraying the evolutionary traces of cyber attacks. Even though previous research has proposed various methods to construct attack knowledge graphs, they generally suffer from limited generalization capability to diverse knowledge types as well as requirement of expertise in model design and tuning. Addressing these limitations, we seek to utilize Large Language Models (LLMs), which have achieved enormous success in a broad range of tasks given exceptional capabilities in both language understanding and zero-shot task fulfillment. Thus, we propose a fully automatic LLM-based framework to construct attack knowledge graphs named: AttacKG+. Our framework consists of four consecutive modules: rewriter, parser, identifier, and summarizer, each of which is implemented by instruction prompting and in-context learning empowered by LLMs. Furthermore, we upgrade the existing attack knowledge schema and propose a comprehensive version. We represent a cyber attack as a temporally unfolding event, each temporal step of which encapsulates three layers of representation, including behavior graph, MITRE TTP labels, and state summary. Extensive evaluation demonstrates that: 1) our formulation seamlessly satisfies the information needs in threat event analysis, 2) our construction framework is effective in faithfully and accurately extracting the information defined by AttacKG+, and 3) our attack graph directly benefits downstream security practices such as attack reconstruction. All the code and datasets will be released upon acceptance.
Read more5/9/2024
0
Fact Finder -- Enhancing Domain Expertise of Large Language Models by Incorporating Knowledge Graphs
Daniel Steinigen, Roman Teucher, Timm Heine Ruland, Max Rudat, Nicolas Flores-Herr, Peter Fischer, Nikola Milosevic, Christopher Schymura, Angelo Ziletti
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased their proficiency in answering natural language queries. However, their effectiveness is hindered by limited domain-specific knowledge, raising concerns about the reliability of their responses. We introduce a hybrid system that augments LLMs with domain-specific knowledge graphs (KGs), thereby aiming to enhance factual correctness using a KG-based retrieval approach. We focus on a medical KG to demonstrate our methodology, which includes (1) pre-processing, (2) Cypher query generation, (3) Cypher query processing, (4) KG retrieval, and (5) LLM-enhanced response generation. We evaluate our system on a curated dataset of 69 samples, achieving a precision of 78% in retrieving correct KG nodes. Our findings indicate that the hybrid system surpasses a standalone LLM in accuracy and completeness, as verified by an LLM-as-a-Judge evaluation method. This positions the system as a promising tool for applications that demand factual correctness and completeness, such as target identification -- a critical process in pinpointing biological entities for disease treatment or crop enhancement. Moreover, its intuitive search interface and ability to provide accurate responses within seconds make it well-suited for time-sensitive, precision-focused research contexts. We publish the source code together with the dataset and the prompt templates used.
Read more8/7/2024