Code Less, Align More: Efficient LLM Fine-tuning for Code Generation with Data Pruning

Read original: arXiv:2407.05040 - Published 7/9/2024 by Yun-Da Tsai, Mingjie Liu, Haoxing Ren
Total Score

0

Code Less, Align More: Efficient LLM Fine-tuning for Code Generation with Data Pruning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a new approach for efficiently fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) for code generation tasks.
  • The key idea is to prune the training data using an alignment-based strategy, which selectively retains the most relevant samples for fine-tuning.
  • This data pruning technique, combined with other optimizations, enables more efficient LLM fine-tuning while maintaining high performance on code generation benchmarks.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on the challenge of fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) for the task of generating code. Fine-tuning these models can be computationally expensive and time-consuming, as it requires training on a large amount of data.

To address this, the researchers developed a data pruning technique that selectively retains the most relevant samples from the training data. The key insight is that not all training data is equally valuable for fine-tuning the model for code generation. By identifying and keeping only the most aligned samples, the researchers were able to achieve high performance on code generation benchmarks while using significantly less training data.

This data pruning approach, combined with other optimizations, allows for more efficient LLM fine-tuning, reducing the computational resources and time required. This can be particularly beneficial for researchers and developers working on code generation applications, as it enables them to experiment and iterate more quickly.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new approach for efficiently fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) for code generation tasks. The core idea is to use an alignment-based data pruning strategy to selectively retain the most relevant samples from the training data.

The authors first propose a novel alignment metric that measures the relevance of each training sample to the target code generation task. This metric is based on the semantic similarity between the code snippet and its corresponding natural language description.

Using this alignment metric, the researchers then develop a data pruning algorithm that selects a subset of the training data that is most aligned with the target task. This pruned dataset is then used to fine-tune the LLM for code generation, resulting in improved performance while requiring significantly less training data.

The paper also explores other optimizations, such as using a curriculum learning approach and employing task-specific prediction heads, to further enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the LLM fine-tuning process.

The researchers evaluate their approach on several code generation benchmarks and demonstrate that it achieves state-of-the-art performance while using up to 50% less training data compared to existing fine-tuning methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach for improving the efficiency of LLM fine-tuning for code generation tasks. The key strength of the work is the data pruning technique, which selectively retains the most relevant training samples based on an alignment metric.

One potential limitation is the reliance on having high-quality natural language descriptions for the code snippets in the training data. In real-world scenarios, such annotations may not always be available or may be of varying quality, which could impact the effectiveness of the alignment-based pruning.

Additionally, the paper focuses on a specific code generation task and it would be interesting to see how the proposed approach generalizes to a wider range of programming languages and applications. Further research could explore the transferability of the data pruning strategy to other LLM fine-tuning tasks beyond code generation.

Finally, the authors mention that their approach is complementary to other LLM optimization techniques, such as [link:https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/brevity-is-soul-wit-pruning-long-files]pruning long files[/link] and [link:https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/data-efficient-fine-tuning-llm-based-recommendation]data-efficient fine-tuning[/link]. Exploring the synergies between these different techniques could lead to even more efficient and effective LLM-based code generation systems.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach for efficiently fine-tuning large language models for code generation tasks. By leveraging an alignment-based data pruning strategy, the researchers were able to achieve state-of-the-art performance on code generation benchmarks while using significantly less training data.

This work contributes to the ongoing efforts to [link:https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/performance-aligned-llms-generating-fast-code]make LLMs more performant and efficient[/link] for real-world applications, such as [link:https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/large-language-model-pruning]large language model pruning[/link] and [link:https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/efficient-pruning-large-language-model-adaptive-estimation]adaptive estimation techniques[/link]. The proposed data pruning method can be a valuable tool for researchers and developers working on code generation systems, allowing them to iterate more quickly and cost-effectively.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Code Less, Align More: Efficient LLM Fine-tuning for Code Generation with Data Pruning
Total Score

0

Code Less, Align More: Efficient LLM Fine-tuning for Code Generation with Data Pruning

Yun-Da Tsai, Mingjie Liu, Haoxing Ren

Recent work targeting large language models (LLMs) for code generation demonstrated that increasing the amount of training data through synthetic code generation often leads to exceptional performance. In this paper we explore data pruning methods aimed at enhancing the efficiency of model training specifically for code LLMs. We present techniques that integrate various clustering and pruning metrics to selectively reduce training data without compromising the accuracy and functionality of the generated code. We observe significant redundancies in synthetic training data generation, where our experiments demonstrate that benchmark performance can be largely preserved by training on only 10% of the data. Moreover, we observe consistent improvements in benchmark results through moderate pruning of the training data. Our experiments show that these pruning strategies not only reduce the computational resources needed but also enhance the overall quality code generation.

Read more

7/9/2024

Brevity is the soul of wit: Pruning long files for code generation
Total Score

0

Brevity is the soul of wit: Pruning long files for code generation

Aaditya K. Singh, Yu Yang, Kushal Tirumala, Mostafa Elhoushi, Ari S. Morcos

Data curation is commonly considered a secret-sauce for LLM training, with higher quality data usually leading to better LLM performance. Given the scale of internet-scraped corpora, data pruning has become a larger and larger focus. Specifically, many have shown that de-duplicating data, or sub-selecting higher quality data, can lead to efficiency or performance improvements. Generally, three types of methods are used to filter internet-scale corpora: embedding-based, heuristic-based, and classifier-based. In this work, we contrast the former two in the domain of finetuning LLMs for code generation. We find that embedding-based methods are often confounded by length, and that a simple heuristic--pruning long files--outperforms other methods in compute-limited regimes. Our method can yield up to a 2x efficiency benefit in training (while matching performance) or a 3.5% absolute performance improvement on HumanEval (while matching compute). However, we find that perplexity on held-out long files can increase, begging the question of whether optimizing data mixtures for common coding benchmarks (HumanEval, MBPP) actually best serves downstream use cases. Overall, we hope our work builds useful intuitions about code data (specifically, the low quality of extremely long code files) provides a compelling heuristic-based method for data pruning, and brings to light questions in how we evaluate code generation models.

Read more

7/2/2024

🤔

Total Score

0

Data-efficient Fine-tuning for LLM-based Recommendation

Xinyu Lin, Wenjie Wang, Yongqi Li, Shuo Yang, Fuli Feng, Yinwei Wei, Tat-Seng Chua

Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) for recommendation has recently garnered considerable attention, where fine-tuning plays a key role in LLMs' adaptation. However, the cost of fine-tuning LLMs on rapidly expanding recommendation data limits their practical application. To address this challenge, few-shot fine-tuning offers a promising approach to quickly adapt LLMs to new recommendation data. We propose the task of data pruning for efficient LLM-based recommendation, aimed at identifying representative samples tailored for LLMs' few-shot fine-tuning. While coreset selection is closely related to the proposed task, existing coreset selection methods often rely on suboptimal heuristic metrics or entail costly optimization on large-scale recommendation data. To tackle these issues, we introduce two objectives for the data pruning task in the context of LLM-based recommendation: 1) high accuracy aims to identify the influential samples that can lead to high overall performance; and 2) high efficiency underlines the low costs of the data pruning process. To pursue the two objectives, we propose a novel data pruning method based on two scores, i.e., influence score and effort score, to efficiently identify the influential samples. Particularly, the influence score is introduced to accurately estimate the influence of sample removal on the overall performance. To achieve low costs of the data pruning process, we use a small-sized surrogate model to replace LLMs to obtain the influence score. Considering the potential gap between the surrogate model and LLMs, we further propose an effort score to prioritize some hard samples specifically for LLMs. Empirical results on three real-world datasets validate the effectiveness of our proposed method. In particular, the proposed method uses only 2% samples to surpass the full data fine-tuning, reducing time costs by 97%.

Read more

6/5/2024

How Do Your Code LLMs Perform? Empowering Code Instruction Tuning with High-Quality Data
Total Score

0

How Do Your Code LLMs Perform? Empowering Code Instruction Tuning with High-Quality Data

Yejie Wang, Keqing He, Dayuan Fu, Zhuoma Gongque, Heyang Xu, Yanxu Chen, Zhexu Wang, Yujia Fu, Guanting Dong, Muxi Diao, Jingang Wang, Mengdi Zhang, Xunliang Cai, Weiran Xu

Recently, there has been a growing interest in studying how to construct better code instruction tuning data. However, we observe Code models trained with these datasets exhibit high performance on HumanEval but perform worse on other benchmarks such as LiveCodeBench. Upon further investigation, we find that many datasets suffer from severe data leakage. After cleaning up most of the leaked data, some well-known high-quality datasets perform poorly. This discovery reveals a new challenge: identifying which dataset genuinely qualify as high-quality code instruction data. To address this, we propose an efficient code data pruning strategy for selecting good samples. Our approach is based on three dimensions: instruction complexity, response quality, and instruction diversity. Based on our selected data, we present XCoder, a family of models finetuned from LLaMA3. Our experiments show XCoder achieves new state-of-the-art performance using fewer training data, which verify the effectiveness of our data strategy. Moreover, we perform a comprehensive analysis on the data composition and find existing code datasets have different characteristics according to their construction methods, which provide new insights for future code LLMs. Our models and dataset are released in https://github.com/banksy23/XCoder

Read more

9/9/2024