CodeMirage: Hallucinations in Code Generated by Large Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2408.08333 - Published 8/19/2024 by Vibhor Agarwal, Yulong Pei, Salwa Alamir, Xiaomo Liu

💬

Overview

Technical paper exploring "hallucinations" in code generated by large language models (LLMs)
Analyzes the prevalence and characteristics of hallucinated code that does not actually work as intended
Proposes methods to detect and mitigate these hallucinations for more reliable code generation

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly capable at generating code, but they can sometimes produce "hallucinated" code that doesn't actually work as expected. This paper investigates the phenomenon of hallucinated code - code that compiles or runs but has bugs or unintended behavior.

The researchers analyzed large datasets of code generated by LLMs to understand how prevalent these hallucinations are and what characteristics they tend to have. They found that hallucinated code is quite common, and often exhibits subtle bugs or issues that would not be caught by basic testing.

The paper proposes several methods to detect and mitigate these hallucinations, such as analyzing the code's execution behavior and comparing it to known good examples. By being able to identify and filter out hallucinated code, the researchers aim to improve the reliability and trustworthiness of LLM-generated code.

Technical Explanation

This paper examines the problem of "hallucinations" in code generated by large language models (LLMs). The authors define hallucinations as code that compiles or runs but has bugs or unintended behavior.

To study this phenomenon, the researchers analyzed large datasets of code generated by LLMs. They developed techniques to detect hallucinated code, including analyzing the code's execution behavior and comparing it to known good examples. The paper presents several key findings:

Hallucinated code is surprisingly common in LLM-generated code, often exhibiting subtle bugs or issues
Hallucinated code tends to have certain distinguishing characteristics, such as unusual variable names or control flow structures
Existing techniques like unit testing are often not sufficient to catch these hallucinations, as the issues may only manifest at runtime

The authors propose several methods to mitigate hallucinations, such as:

Using execution-based analysis to identify anomalies in the generated code
Comparing LLM-generated code to known good examples to detect deviations
Incorporating human review and feedback loops to refine the code generation process

By being able to reliably identify and filter out hallucinated code, the researchers aim to improve the trustworthiness and reliability of code generated by large language models.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful analysis of an important challenge facing the use of large language models for code generation. The researchers acknowledge that while LLMs have become remarkably capable at generating functional code, the problem of hallucinations remains a significant concern.

One limitation mentioned in the paper is the difficulty of scaling the proposed mitigation techniques to very large datasets of generated code. The authors note that more research is needed to develop efficient and scalable methods for detecting hallucinations. Additionally, the paper does not explore the root causes of hallucinations or potential ways to prevent them from occurring in the first place.

Further research could also investigate the broader implications of hallucinated code, such as its potential impact on software security, maintenance, and user trust. As LLMs become more widely adopted for code generation, it will be crucial to ensure the reliability and trustworthiness of the output.

Conclusion

This paper makes an important contribution to understanding the prevalence and characteristics of hallucinated code generated by large language models. By identifying the problem and proposing detection and mitigation strategies, the researchers aim to improve the reliability and trustworthiness of LLM-powered code generation.

As LLMs continue to advance, addressing the challenge of hallucinations will be crucial for their successful adoption in real-world software development. The insights and techniques presented in this paper provide a valuable foundation for further research and development in this area.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

CodeMirage: Hallucinations in Code Generated by Large Language Models

Vibhor Agarwal, Yulong Pei, Salwa Alamir, Xiaomo Liu

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising potentials in program generation and no-code automation. However, LLMs are prone to generate hallucinations, i.e., they generate text which sounds plausible but is incorrect. Although there has been a recent surge in research on LLM hallucinations for text generation, similar hallucination phenomenon can happen in code generation. Sometimes the generated code can have syntactical or logical errors as well as more advanced issues like security vulnerabilities, memory leaks, etc. Given the wide adaptation of LLMs to enhance efficiency in code generation and development in general, it becomes imperative to investigate hallucinations in code generation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt at studying hallucinations in the code generated by LLMs. We start by introducing the code hallucination definition and a comprehensive taxonomy of code hallucination types. We propose the first benchmark CodeMirage dataset for code hallucinations. The benchmark contains 1,137 GPT-3.5 generated hallucinated code snippets for Python programming problems from two base datasets - HumanEval and MBPP. We then propose the methodology for code hallucination detection and experiment with open source LLMs such as CodeLLaMA as well as OpenAI's GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 models using one-shot prompt. We find that GPT-4 performs the best on HumanEval dataset and gives comparable results to the fine-tuned CodeBERT baseline on MBPP dataset. Towards the end, we discuss various mitigation strategies for code hallucinations and conclude our work.

8/19/2024

📊

Code Hallucination

Mirza Masfiqur Rahman, Ashish Kundu

Generative models such as large language models are extensively used as code copilots and for whole program generation. However, the programs they generate often have questionable correctness, authenticity and reliability in terms of integration as they might not follow the user requirements, provide incorrect and/or nonsensical outputs, or even contain semantic/syntactic errors - overall known as LLM hallucination. In this work, we present several types of code hallucination. We have generated such hallucinated code manually using large language models. We also present a technique - HallTrigger, in order to demonstrate efficient ways of generating arbitrary code hallucination. Our method leverages 3 different dynamic attributes of LLMs to craft prompts that can successfully trigger hallucinations from models without the need to access model architecture or parameters. Results from popular blackbox models suggest that HallTrigger is indeed effective and the pervasive LLM hallucination have sheer impact on software development.

7/9/2024

Exploring and Evaluating Hallucinations in LLM-Powered Code Generation

Fang Liu, Yang Liu, Lin Shi, Houkun Huang, Ruifeng Wang, Zhen Yang, Li Zhang, Zhongqi Li, Yuchi Ma

The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) has significantly advanced many applications on software engineering tasks, particularly in code generation. Despite the promising performance, LLMs are prone to generate hallucinations, which means LLMs might produce outputs that deviate from users' intent, exhibit internal inconsistencies, or misalign with the factual knowledge, making the deployment of LLMs potentially risky in a wide range of applications. Existing work mainly focuses on investing the hallucination in the domain of natural language generation (NLG), leaving a gap in understanding the types and extent of hallucinations in the context of code generation. To bridge the gap, we conducted a thematic analysis of the LLM-generated code to summarize and categorize the hallucinations present in it. Our study established a comprehensive taxonomy of hallucinations in LLM-generated code, encompassing 5 primary categories of hallucinations depending on the conflicting objectives and varying degrees of deviation observed in code generation. Furthermore, we systematically analyzed the distribution of hallucinations, exploring variations among different LLMs and their correlation with code correctness. Based on the results, we proposed HalluCode, a benchmark for evaluating the performance of code LLMs in recognizing hallucinations. Hallucination recognition and mitigation experiments with HalluCode and HumanEval show existing LLMs face great challenges in recognizing hallucinations, particularly in identifying their types, and are hardly able to mitigate hallucinations. We believe our findings will shed light on future research about hallucination evaluation, detection, and mitigation, ultimately paving the way for building more effective and reliable code LLMs in the future.

5/14/2024

🌿

CodeHalu: Code Hallucinations in LLMs Driven by Execution-based Verification

Yuchen Tian, Weixiang Yan, Qian Yang, Xuandong Zhao, Qian Chen, Wen Wang, Ziyang Luo, Lei Ma, Dawn Song

Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant progress in code generation, offering developers groundbreaking automated programming support. However, LLMs often generate code that is syntactically correct and even semantically plausible, but may not execute as expected or fulfill specified requirements. This phenomenon of hallucinations in the code domain has not been systematically explored. To advance the community's understanding and research on this issue, we introduce the concept of code hallucinations and propose a classification method for code hallucination based on execution verification. We categorize code hallucinations into four main types: mapping, naming, resource, and logic hallucinations, with each category further divided into different subcategories to understand and address the unique challenges faced by LLMs in code generation with finer granularity. Additionally, we present a dynamic detection algorithm called CodeHalu designed to detect and quantify code hallucinations. We also introduce the CodeHaluEval benchmark, which includes 8,883 samples from 699 tasks, to systematically and quantitatively evaluate code hallucinations. By evaluating 17 popular LLMs using this benchmark, we reveal significant differences in their accuracy and reliability in code generation, offering detailed insights for further improving the code generation capabilities of LLMs. The CodeHalu benchmark and code are publicly available at https://github.com/yuchen814/CodeHalu.

8/20/2024