Code Hallucination
0
📊
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Explores the phenomenon of "hallucinated code" in large language models (LLMs) used for code generation
- Examines the characteristics and implications of hallucinated code, which refers to code that is generated by the model but does not match the intended functionality
- Provides a comprehensive overview of the current research and discussions around this issue
Plain English Explanation
Exploring Evaluating Hallucinations LLMS and CodeHaLu are research papers that investigate the concept of "hallucinated code" in large language models (LLMs) used for generating code. Hallucinated code refers to code that is generated by the model but does not actually work or match the intended functionality.
These papers aim to understand the characteristics and implications of hallucinated code. They explore how LLMs, which are trained on vast amounts of code data, can sometimes generate code that looks plausible but is not actually functional. This can be a problem when these models are used for tasks like automating software development or assisting programmers.
The research examines different ways to identify and evaluate hallucinated code, as well as strategies for mitigating the issue. This is an important area of study as the use of LLMs in code-related tasks becomes more widespread.
Technical Explanation
Exploring Evaluating Hallucinations LLMS and CodeHaLu present research on the phenomenon of "hallucinated code" in large language models (LLMs) used for code generation. Hallucinated code refers to code that is generated by the model but does not match the intended functionality.
The research examines different approaches for identifying and evaluating hallucinated code, such as static analysis, dynamic execution, and comparison to ground truth. The papers also explore factors that contribute to the generation of hallucinated code, including model architecture, training data, and prompting strategies.
Additionally, the research investigates potential mitigation strategies, such as using execution-based evaluation, incorporating safety checks, and leveraging human feedback to improve the model's understanding of correct code.
The findings from these studies provide valuable insights into the challenges and considerations involved in developing reliable and trustworthy LLM-powered code generation systems.
Critical Analysis
The research presented in Exploring Evaluating Hallucinations LLMS and CodeHaLu highlights the importance of understanding and mitigating the issue of hallucinated code in large language models (LLMs) used for code generation.
One potential limitation of the research is the reliance on static and dynamic analysis techniques, which may not capture the full complexity of real-world software development workflows. Additionally, the papers do not extensively explore the impact of specific model architectures, training data, or prompting strategies on the generation of hallucinated code.
Further research could focus on developing more comprehensive evaluation frameworks that incorporate a wider range of software engineering best practices and edge cases. Exploring the integration of human feedback and interactive learning mechanisms may also be a promising direction for improving the reliability of LLM-powered code generation.
It is also worth considering the broader implications of hallucinated code, such as its impact on the adoption and trust in AI-assisted software development tools, as well as the potential consequences of deploying hallucinated code in production environments.
Conclusion
The research presented in Exploring Evaluating Hallucinations LLMS and CodeHaLu highlights the important challenge of hallucinated code in large language models (LLMs) used for code generation. By understanding the characteristics and causes of hallucinated code, researchers can develop more robust and reliable LLM-powered tools for software development.
As the use of LLMs in code-related tasks becomes more widespread, addressing the issue of hallucinated code will be crucial for ensuring the safety, security, and trustworthiness of AI-assisted software development. The insights and mitigation strategies explored in these papers lay the groundwork for further advancements in this important field of research.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📊
0
Code Hallucination
Mirza Masfiqur Rahman, Ashish Kundu
Generative models such as large language models are extensively used as code copilots and for whole program generation. However, the programs they generate often have questionable correctness, authenticity and reliability in terms of integration as they might not follow the user requirements, provide incorrect and/or nonsensical outputs, or even contain semantic/syntactic errors - overall known as LLM hallucination. In this work, we present several types of code hallucination. We have generated such hallucinated code manually using large language models. We also present a technique - HallTrigger, in order to demonstrate efficient ways of generating arbitrary code hallucination. Our method leverages 3 different dynamic attributes of LLMs to craft prompts that can successfully trigger hallucinations from models without the need to access model architecture or parameters. Results from popular blackbox models suggest that HallTrigger is indeed effective and the pervasive LLM hallucination have sheer impact on software development.
Read more7/9/2024
💬
0
CodeMirage: Hallucinations in Code Generated by Large Language Models
Vibhor Agarwal, Yulong Pei, Salwa Alamir, Xiaomo Liu
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising potentials in program generation and no-code automation. However, LLMs are prone to generate hallucinations, i.e., they generate text which sounds plausible but is incorrect. Although there has been a recent surge in research on LLM hallucinations for text generation, similar hallucination phenomenon can happen in code generation. Sometimes the generated code can have syntactical or logical errors as well as more advanced issues like security vulnerabilities, memory leaks, etc. Given the wide adaptation of LLMs to enhance efficiency in code generation and development in general, it becomes imperative to investigate hallucinations in code generation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt at studying hallucinations in the code generated by LLMs. We start by introducing the code hallucination definition and a comprehensive taxonomy of code hallucination types. We propose the first benchmark CodeMirage dataset for code hallucinations. The benchmark contains 1,137 GPT-3.5 generated hallucinated code snippets for Python programming problems from two base datasets - HumanEval and MBPP. We then propose the methodology for code hallucination detection and experiment with open source LLMs such as CodeLLaMA as well as OpenAI's GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 models using one-shot prompt. We find that GPT-4 performs the best on HumanEval dataset and gives comparable results to the fine-tuned CodeBERT baseline on MBPP dataset. Towards the end, we discuss various mitigation strategies for code hallucinations and conclude our work.
Read more8/19/2024
0
Exploring and Evaluating Hallucinations in LLM-Powered Code Generation
Fang Liu, Yang Liu, Lin Shi, Houkun Huang, Ruifeng Wang, Zhen Yang, Li Zhang, Zhongqi Li, Yuchi Ma
The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) has significantly advanced many applications on software engineering tasks, particularly in code generation. Despite the promising performance, LLMs are prone to generate hallucinations, which means LLMs might produce outputs that deviate from users' intent, exhibit internal inconsistencies, or misalign with the factual knowledge, making the deployment of LLMs potentially risky in a wide range of applications. Existing work mainly focuses on investing the hallucination in the domain of natural language generation (NLG), leaving a gap in understanding the types and extent of hallucinations in the context of code generation. To bridge the gap, we conducted a thematic analysis of the LLM-generated code to summarize and categorize the hallucinations present in it. Our study established a comprehensive taxonomy of hallucinations in LLM-generated code, encompassing 5 primary categories of hallucinations depending on the conflicting objectives and varying degrees of deviation observed in code generation. Furthermore, we systematically analyzed the distribution of hallucinations, exploring variations among different LLMs and their correlation with code correctness. Based on the results, we proposed HalluCode, a benchmark for evaluating the performance of code LLMs in recognizing hallucinations. Hallucination recognition and mitigation experiments with HalluCode and HumanEval show existing LLMs face great challenges in recognizing hallucinations, particularly in identifying their types, and are hardly able to mitigate hallucinations. We believe our findings will shed light on future research about hallucination evaluation, detection, and mitigation, ultimately paving the way for building more effective and reliable code LLMs in the future.
Read more5/14/2024
🌿
0
CodeHalu: Code Hallucinations in LLMs Driven by Execution-based Verification
Yuchen Tian, Weixiang Yan, Qian Yang, Xuandong Zhao, Qian Chen, Wen Wang, Ziyang Luo, Lei Ma, Dawn Song
Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant progress in code generation, offering developers groundbreaking automated programming support. However, LLMs often generate code that is syntactically correct and even semantically plausible, but may not execute as expected or fulfill specified requirements. This phenomenon of hallucinations in the code domain has not been systematically explored. To advance the community's understanding and research on this issue, we introduce the concept of code hallucinations and propose a classification method for code hallucination based on execution verification. We categorize code hallucinations into four main types: mapping, naming, resource, and logic hallucinations, with each category further divided into different subcategories to understand and address the unique challenges faced by LLMs in code generation with finer granularity. Additionally, we present a dynamic detection algorithm called CodeHalu designed to detect and quantify code hallucinations. We also introduce the CodeHaluEval benchmark, which includes 8,883 samples from 699 tasks, to systematically and quantitatively evaluate code hallucinations. By evaluating 17 popular LLMs using this benchmark, we reveal significant differences in their accuracy and reliability in code generation, offering detailed insights for further improving the code generation capabilities of LLMs. The CodeHalu benchmark and code are publicly available at https://github.com/yuchen814/CodeHalu.
Read more8/20/2024